patrick.net

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/04/10/international-left-wing-elites-crushing-democracy/

The problem is obvious: if a rise in temperature violates our right to a private and family life, what doesn’t? Where will the ECHR power grab end?

The game here is clear. By making everything about “human rights” that cannot be questioned, then the democratic sphere, where we can debate and disagree and vote for different approaches, is drastically curtailed, and the influence of Left-wing lawyers massively increased.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370475066_Laws_of_Physics_Define_the_Insignificant_Warming_of_Earth_by_CO2

Watch.before they take this down:

https://vimeo.com/924719370

UkraineIsTotallyFucked says

Watch.before they take this down:

https://vimeo.com/924719370

"They" (globohomo elites) have swallowed the concept that the world's resources are on the tail end of depletion. They are trying to force the Industrial Revolution genie back into the bottle so that we revert to the pre-industrial, medieval era, when the world population was under 1 billion.

UkraineIsTotallyFucked says

I propose we ban production of ketchup first. It's totally unnecessary and if it disappears less tomatos will need to be grown, thus cutting the "global warming".

RWSGFY says

UkraineIsTotallyFucked says

I propose we ban production of ketchup first. It's totally unnecessary and if it disappears less tomatos will need to be grown, thus cutting the "global warming".

And tax the devil out of private jets.

https://metatron.substack.com/p/co2-does-not-cause-global-warming

CO2 Does Not Cause Global Warming

Evidence from peer-reviewed scientific literature so you won't hear it on the news...

3 Physicists Use Experimental Evidence To Show CO2’s Capacity To Absorb Radiation Has Saturated

Adding CO2 to the atmosphere can have no significant climatic effect when rising above the threshold of about 300 ppm. Due to saturation, higher and higher concentrations do not lead to any further absorption of radiation.

If one were to paint a white surface black so as to allow it to absorb as much heat as possible, it is well known the first layer of paint has the most dominant impact on heat absorption. A second coat covers up any remaining grayish color and perhaps a few spots missed on the first layer. By the third layer, there is effectively no more heat absorption that can be attained with the additional coat, as the surface is saturated in black. It cannot become blacker.

Three Polish physicists have focused their attention on this saturation principle as it applies to CO2 in three recently published papers (Kubicki et al., 2024, 2022, and 2020). Their latest (Kubicki et al., 2024), published in Applications in Engineering Science, summarizes the experimental evidence from their 2020 and 2022 publications substantiating the conclusion that “as a result of saturation processes, emitted CO2 does not directly cause an increase in global temperature.”

https://notrickszone.com/2024/04/23/3-physicists-use-experimental-evidence-to-show-co2s-capacity-to-absorb-radiation-has-saturated/

https://babylonbee.com/cleanArticle/37-year-old-man-suddenly-remembers-that-hes-supposed-to-be-worrying-about-the-hole-in-the-ozone-layer

The_Deplorable says

Pays the bills.

https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/worlds-largest-floating-solar-farm-wrecked-storm-just-launch

AmericanKulak says

Nooooooooooo!

Guy in funny looking costume trashes the USA for "irresponsible lifestyles" that contribute to the climate change crisis, but not *China.


From Breitbart (in part):

Curiously, Pope Francis has singled out the United States as particularly responsible for the climate “emergency” because of the “irresponsible lifestyle” of its citizens.

“If we consider that emissions per individual in the United States are about two times greater than those of individuals living in China, and about seven times greater than the average of the poorest countries, we can state that a broad change in the irresponsible lifestyle connected with the Western model would have a significant long-term impact,” the pope said last October.

The alert folks at The Pillar Catholic, an online Catholic news outlet, pointed out at the time that in fact “U.S. per capita emissions are less than 1.5 times that of China,” adding that China’s per capita emissions levels “are significantly higher than the global average.”

The pope also failed to mention that in aggregate, China’s emissions are more than double those of the United States, and America’s air is among the cleanest of any nation, while China’s air quality is among the poorest.

In his introduction to the Vatican summit, which will be held May 15-17, Francis states that climate change is “no longer a secondary or ideological question, but a drama that harms us all,” adding that climate change manifests “a tragic and striking example of structural sin.”

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/05/12/pope-francis-world-nearing-breaking-point-from-climate-change/

PS: * The Vatican recently announced that their 'deal' with the Chi-Coms has been renewed. The Vatican receives $2 Billion American annually from the Chi-Coms, in return, the Chi-Coms get to choose 'Catholic' Bishops and Clergy, while the Vatican agrees not to criticize any policies of the Communist Chinese, including the ongoing persecution of Christians in China.

Vatican is a country. What's their per-capita emissions?

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/stormy-weather-saturday-may-18-2024

Is ‘climate change’ causing weather records to fall? Probably not, since CO2 doesn’t exist in space. I’ll put one theory out there, a theory that is extremely hard to find anywhere in corporate media, probably since it contradicts the lucrative manmade climate theory. ...

Earth is rapidly losing its magnetic shielding at an accelerating rate of five percent per decade...

It seems self-evidence that as the field weakens, more solar radiation will get through, causing changes on Earth. Things like worldwide aurora, for example. But don’t believe your lying eyes.

Last year, corporate media collectively began “debunking” the commonsense notion that a weaker magnetic field will lead to more violent and extreme Earth weather. It’s just a coincidence.

But as usual, the certainty in the headline was betrayed by the details. Scientists aren’t quite as sure as National Geographic’s headline writers are. ...

The faces get prettier, but the tits get smaller - how can you have porn without tits?

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/deadly-force-wednesday-may-22-2024

Similarly, the data crunching on last week’s dramatic solar storms continues, and it looks like we weren’t over-selling its historic nature after all. ...

It was so unusual that they initially didn’t even consider the storms could cause strong deep-sea readings. But the same scientists will swear on a stack of Q’rans that all this extra solar energy has no effect on Earth’s climate, because science. Shut up! Don’t ruin it for everybody.

The sun's energy output varies, as does the type of rays emitted.