patrick.net

@TuckerCarlson

May 12
Ep. 105 Few people know Justin Trudeau better than his own brother. Here’s what he says about him.

Rasmussen poll unearths the bizarre discovery that 15% of respondents ages 40-64 'forgot' if they got a covid vaccine

They found that a substantial percentage of respondents claimed to know someone personally who was killed by a covid vaccine:




... This is wild.

Nobody (except perhaps Biden) ‘forgets’ whether they got a covid vaccine. So this is basically an obvious and open lie to the pollster.

So basically, we’ve got a bunch of people who on the one hand are too embarrassed to admit that they got a covid vaccine, but on the other hand can’t bring themselves to openly lie that they didn’t get a covid vaccine, leading them to go for the middle ground of lie that they don’t remember if they got a vaccine.

In other words, the subject of covid vaccines has become so toxic that - if this poll’s results are to be believed - a sizeable minority not only regrets getting vaccinated but feel ashamed for having done so.

Moreover, when people lie blatantly and anonymously, they are usually doing so in order to deceive themselves in order to maintain a fiction in their own self-image or identity. There are many reasons why people could have psychological difficulty with their vaccinated status, including:

They don’t want to admit they were inept or gullible enough to get manipulated and tricked into getting vaccinated which in hindsight is now both a very significant decision an a colossal failure of their judgement

Coercion to get vaccinated left them feeling abused/violated/traumatized, something which they would rather push out of their consciousness, but admitting they are vaccinated forces them to relive the abuse and maintains or anchors these feelings in their conscious mind. Other bullying or abuse associated with the vaccines could also lead to this.

Similar to the previous one, they are afraid for their own health going forward, and would rather not contemplate their own potential risks from the covid vaccines, and so deny their own vaccination status in order to push it out of their consciousness

The fact of so many “defections” indicates that a great many more people feel similarly - the defectors are the tip of the iceberg who feel strongly enough to tell an readily obvious lie on a poll, but most people who harbor resentment, anger or trauma about getting vaccinated are not going to lie about their vaccination status on an anonymous poll.

The primary takeaway to me is that covid vaccines have incredibly toxic culturally, which is good news.

In a major U-turn, a prominent pro-vaccine doctor has blown the whistle and raised the alarm about the deadly consequences of being injected with Covid mRNA shots.

Annette Bosworth, also known as “Dr. Boz,” has released an explosive video statement to warn the public about “the biggest crime in the history of medicine.”

In the bombshell live-streamed video, the pro-vaccine doctor expresses deep regret that she “had all of the people I love vaccinated.”

Dr. Boz highlights a study exposing the harm caused by Covid mRNA injections.

She continues by warning that health officials, scientists, and doctors who claim the mRNA vaccines are “safe” should not be trusted.

The doctor also warns that information highlighting the dangers of the injections is being covered up and censored. ...

McCullough explains that people around the world are now beginning to realize that they made a “giant personal health mistake” by being injected with the Covid mRNA shots.

“Understanding what’s happening is slow,” McCullough explains.

“It’s very very psychological.

“I think once people take the vaccines they just can’t psychologically handle the idea that it could’ve been a giant personal health mistake.

“And most people who took the vaccines, they’ll tell you…they’ll say, ‘I don’t want to talk about it.’

“That means psychologically they can’t handle it.”

“Covid-19,” Psychological Operations, and the War for Technocracy

Authors: David A. Hughes

Exposes the transnational psychological warfare operation camouflaged by “Covid-19”
Identifies World War III seeking to replace liberal democracy with totalitarian technocracy
Explores the potential for evil of weaponized neurotechnology
This book is open access, which means that you have free and unlimited access

Camouflaged by “Covid-19,” an undeclared global class war was initiated in 2020, aimed at replacing liberal democracy with technocracy, a novel, biodigital form of totalitarianism. The opening campaign involved the largest psychological operation in history, intended to demoralise, disorientate, and debilitate the public. This volume deals with the application of shock and stress, trauma-based mind control, the use of fear and threat, cognitive attack, weaponised deception, and techniques for turning society against itself.

I’m a little sorry to go all quasi-supernatural with you about this, but we are truly faced with the fact that the devastation in sexual relations and failures of family formation in recent decades has produced a very particular form of anomie in Western Civ’s female population — and the dynamic has badly deranged increasingly feminized men, too. Covid-19 was basically a Munchausen-by-proxy event, which ChatGPT describes accordingly:

. . . a psychological disorder wherein a caregiver, typically a parent, exaggerates, fabricates, or induces illness or injury in a person under their care, usually a child. The primary motive is to gain attention, sympathy, or praise from medical professionals and others, rather than any tangible benefit like financial gain.”

Actually, ChatGPT was wrong about the financial gain part. There were billions made off Covid by Big Pharma, including hundreds of millions in royalties doled out to public health employees. The government played the role of “mother” in the Covid caper, keeping you (her “children”) safe. You’ve noticed, I’m sure, that claims about safety and safe places have been major themes in Wokery both before and during Covid. Anyway, as usual with Munchausen-by-proxy syndrome, the “children” (i.e., the US population) were injured badly by the “treatment,” the mRNA vaccines. And also as usual with mothers displaying Cluster-B personality disorder, the “bad” children who refuted the narrative and refused the specified “treatment” were punished severely. (Cluster-B is sadistic.)

One thing this suggests is that the cabal running things behind the empty suit “Joe Biden” is dominated by women, and my guess would be the women directly associated with Barack Obama: Susan Rice, Lisa Monaco, Kathryn Ruemmler, Sally Yates, Valarie Jarrett, Samantha Power, Avril Haines, Torie Nuland, give-or-take some combo of them, et al. I have alleged for years that the motif driving batshit-crazy, Cluster-B Democratic Party women is that Donald Trump represents Daddy’s-in-the-house. In their boundaryless state-of-mind nothing threatens the Cluster-B ladies as much as the imposition of boundaries by a fearsome daddy figure. Daddy = the monster of monsters to them.

proposition 1: if politicians are bought and sold, the sort of people attracted to politics will be grifters.

this seems a natural outcome. politics becomes a goody room and the kinds of people that excel at conning others and compromising morals will chase the gold rush.

proposition 2: grifters gonna grift

sure, this is basically tautological, but it contains a meaningful implication that ought be drawn out: grifters are con and confidence people. they need a song and dance, a schtick, a story, something to not only pack the rubes into the tent but to separate them from their wallets. they need a reason to take big actions, take your stuff, and to give it to someone else (or at least to make you do it for them). they need a malady for which to sell you their magical elixir.

proposition 3: grifting turns politics into “story time”

the story does not have to be true. in many ways it’s better if it’s not as you get a lot more optionality. but the story needs a villain and the story needs a plan. but most of all, the story needs a sucker and that sucker is the demos. the confidence conclave needs to convince the audience to go along with the grift, and they either manage to do so or, if they cannot, are rapidly replaced by more compelling carnival barkers who can. those who buy politicians pay for performance.

proposition 4: story time makes the people into rubes.

as they fall for these stories, the people become rubes. they genuinely believe the grift and clamor to pay for the shiny products on display even and especially when this is just lining the pockets of con men that they have mistaken for leaders. they become true believers. and here is where it takes a bit of a turn:

proposition 5: true believers are more believable than grifters.

people are, at subconscious levels, good at spotting lies. this makes grifts hard to keep going for long periods. it’s also why the hegemonic huckster class is wont to surround itself with zealots and activists. these people add a patina of credibility to the whole affair because their sincerity shines through. and this is how it gets out of control.

proposition 6: the demos starts to prefer true believers to grifters and elect them to office

once the “story” is sufficiently set in the public consciousness, the public starts to seek out its most devout and vivid tellers and these are nearly always of the “true believer” class. they simply have more energy, honesty, and intensity than the carnival barkers ever could. they are singing the gospel and meaning it and they come to power as a sort of trickle then a torrent that changes the crooked circus midway into something more like an old timey revival tent. and so the intensification cycle begins.

proposition 7: the more fervent new leaders tell more intense stories.

the true believer tells a more strident and demanding story. they are no longer grifting, they are evangelizing. this brings new levels of vehemence, less tolerance for any other ideas, and proselytizing zeal.

proposition 8: more intense stories make the public more committed to the story.

and this in turn further arouses the public to greater belief and commitment which in turn increases demand for stridency in leaders and round and round it goes until some sort of intensity maximization is reached, usually when the wheels start coming off. and this is a huge problem because, as we flash back to old axioms, one must realize:

proposition 9: the true believers do not know that the grift is a grift.

what began as crony corporatism and scam has become a secular religion/activism cult. its false and facile tenets designed to separate fools from their money and enrich special interests have become sincerely held ideological dogma and those who will preach it to you have been strained and selected until only the most gullible and zealous remain.

and so we arrive at gato’s postulate:

a democratic government powerful enough to dictate that which is bought and sold will inevitably devolve into rule by rube.

and this is how you wind up with government where the people running the scam not only have no conception that they are running a scam but have subsumed their entire identities into it.

and they have no idea how anything works.

they were flat out selected for not knowing how anything works.