« First « Previous Comments 7 - 27 of 27 Search these comments
t flies in the face of the spirit of the 22nd. Can they pretzel it into some kind of "legality"? Sure can. Pukin did too.
RWSGFY says
t flies in the face of the spirit of the 22nd. Can they pretzel it into some kind of "legality"? Sure can. Pukin did too.
Why do you pretend this is real? The author of the piece you quote just made it up, and even says it won't happen.
I said they float it, and they do.
This is the only statement I made.
RWSGFY says
It flies in the face of the spirit of the 22nd.
No.it doesn't.
times , pretzel logic and phony legalisms be damned. This is the spirit of 22.
RWSGFY says
times , pretzel logic and phony legalisms be damned. This is the spirit of 22.
There is no fucking 'spirit' of the Constitution.
So just pull all that bullshit outta your ass and get a move on in life.
Your hysterionics are very enterntaining.
RWSGFY says
Your hysterionics are very enterntaining.
You're the one
Isn't there a rule that states one cannot be VP if they are ineligible to be President, specifically due to the ascension possibility?
Isn't there a rule that states one cannot be VP if they are ineligible to be President,
It was pertaining to Obama, specifically, but my comment about Kamala is that she's basically an anchor baby. From what I understand, her parents weren't American citizens at the time she was born.
https://apple.news/AWtv4WSojQgmm9EBXzRzhZg
PS. It's the same type of pseudo-legal contortionism Pukin used to stay in power beyond 2 terms allowed by Soviet constitution. Now his "reset" boy Obama is following in his footsteps.