patrick.net

I think there is something to to this.

Another reason is that other cultures mostly still have a patriarchy or at least strong male influence keeping womynx in check and aiding them to pursue MAGA worthy goals and lead the house affairs wheres in the nu western soyboy culture the womynx early on walk all over the mean and change the dynamic to totally unhinged and unbalanced so no sane nuclear family is possible as long as the soyboys cuck. Everybody who is married to an American/European womyn probably knows how corrupted our culture has been from 2nd and 3rd wave feminism. The amount of entitlement amongst White womynx is staggering and there is always some culture/lamestream faggot marxist media bleed no matter how well you chose. In fact I would go as far as saying that white womynx are responsible for 80% of the disputes these days, so they seriously need to get some checks and balances by MAGA influence.

mell says

patriarchy or at least strong male influence keeping womynx in check and aiding them to pursue MAGA worthy goals

The Hispanic womyn in question like Trump and a few of them said they started voting R becuase of him. Being macho is appreciated in that culture.

Bd6r says

Being macho is appreciated in that culture.

Yes, Hispanic culture actually invented that term "Macho."

I also feel like I've noticed a trend where people who work their way to success seem more likely to think the system works well, and thus tend to hold somewhat conservative views. They've seen it firsthand - how their friends and family members at the bottom, who were their peers at one time, have remained stagnant, while a few rose up. Those who rise see and understand the behavioral differences responsible for the rise. The stagnant don't see the behavioral differences because they just don't understand the problems with their choices, and thus look for something to blame.

Those who started higher up with extreme advantages seem to be more likely to blue their hair. Not sure why, but I suppose they see some of the advantages brought by money, and by connections, and by being surrounded by winners instead of losers. And I suppose one day they hear someone speaking resentfully about those with advantages, and they want to alleviate the possibility of future attacks and criticisms by allying with the bottom. Or maybe someone pointing out how they started with nothing and achieved, and the person with advantages worries they will relatively underachieve, failing to further progress themselves upwards, so they abandon their position and ally with the bottom to avoid the inevitable humiliation of their failures and the squandering of their advantages.

Effort and hard work is universally respected. Luck isn't, and is often resented.

I would bet most of those fashion slut radical lesbo activist types are either spending daddy's money, trust fund money, or intelligence agency money, and are seldom if ever in their own earning capacity.

New Yorker many years ago had an article written by a 'former' radical lesbian, and she made it clear it was an ongoing soap opera of competitive insanity writ large. The worst thing you could do to them was to accept their agenda, because then they would have to invent an even more radical, offensive and psychotic agenda.

Hircus says

Those who started higher up with extreme advantages seem to be more likely to blue their hair. Not sure why, but I suppose they see some of the advantages brought by money, and by connections, and by being surrounded by winners instead of losers.

I think it's quite common among people who were born rich to be very insecure about their own abilities because they've never really been tested. It's interesting psychology.

I'm also interested in the reasons that beautiful and ugly women tend to gravitate towards the conservative and the leftist movements respectively. It could just be that beautiful women are winning in the mating game, and so they approve of the traditional culture and the biological reality which makes them winners. And just the opposite on the left: women who have a big disadvantage in the mating game hate the traditional culture and the biological reality which makes them losers. Of course it's not universal, just tendencies.

These successful Hispanic women are not the same as the illegals that are always poring in that will always be for whoever hand out the most free shit.

https://x.com/AutismCapital/status/1830309413179306209

Patrick says

BotS: Brides of the State