patrick.net

Guess they should have sacrificed more children on altars before the debate. Doesn't seem KamalaToe entity made quite the splash they thought she would. I like the poll that included the moderators as winners or losers of the debate.

I guess KamalaToe's earring Intel wowie zowie telecommunications device didn't fool too many people.

When their magic tricks turn into a mockery boomerang? Ouch. Surprising number of commentaries that KamalaToe is fake and wearing a mask. Are people waking up to the avatar, name stealing, and masking gambits for their cartoons?

https://t.me/tribunalsandexecutions/480648

I think it still remains to be seen, but there is a glimmer of hopium. LOL! Trump just got a KommieKunt Struggle Session from lying Mockingbird and lying Kamalatoe.

LOL! Literally an S. Clay Wilson cartoon, fags, dykes, trannies and Kommies.

It appears that Trump going gentle on her baited the trap. Into the Valley of KamalaToe disintegration of a second debate. I wonder if Trump will go Pit Bull on her fake ass. The Mockingbird and CIA demons are going to require at least a few thousand grisly human sacrifices to lube her/its way past this one.

I did not watch this debate. I will wait for Hitler's reaction.

I couldn't watch it; I can't stand to listen to the moderators nor Kamala speak.

I'll look for some "supercut" videos of the debate on YouTube today.

Trump sometimes needs to stick to the subject; illegals are bad not because they eat your pet, they're bad for 10 other more important reasons.

My shitty mood has been on a slow boil for 4+ years now; I hope I can snap out of it.

My younger friend is surprised: "You're grumpy, but you should be happy, you can do anything you want to."

WookieMan says

Biggest waste of my time in a while.

I didnt watch the debate. Nothing is going to change, no matter who gets elected.

WookieMan says

Women leaders don't want men around. Soak that in and really think about what I said. It's not a claim.

Unless there is a man who backs up the women consistently.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3M1xUtCGCns

My Perspective On The 2024 Presidential Debate - Tulsi Gabbard

The praise for Chyna-loving pedo Orban was weird though: the guy is a pres of a midget country whose weight comes from weird EU and NATO rules giving outsize influence to this kind of midgets, and even then it's mostly limited to stalling important decisions which eventually go through anyway after his joke of a country gets some crumbs from the EU table . This kind of nobody shouldn't even be visible to Trump, lol.

personal

All in all, this debate was good for one particular thing: Too much hubris on the MAGA side lately needed to be deflated.

personal

Wow! An intelligent & Informed Undecided Voter (usually they are not)

And CNN found her. More impressive.

And CNN let her on their panel. WTF?

I think the winner of the debate was anyone fortunate enough not to see it. It was essentially not just painful but predictable and basically inconsequential.

It didn’t change anything, and what remains to be seen is how the globalists plans for world domination through deception, manipulation and eventually brute force will advance in the next 2-6 months and beyond. It seems as though the world is at a crossroads in so many ways.
More assassin attempts? War overseas? Nuclear weapons use? Civil unrest domestically from Antifa/Illegal Immigrant gangs and terrorists? Rising crime and lawlessness in the cities and spilling into the suburbs? Economic upheavals? False flag(s)? Weather events? Fake or real pandemics? And will the rapture/rescue promised by Jesus and elaborated on by the New Testament scribes be the next event that happens allowing the events of Revelation to unfold?

What Trump should have said is that our nation is living under the curse of 70 million babies killed under the guise of healthcare. A dead baby, killed in the 6th week, 7 month or anytime is a tragedy. Doctors and patients deserve to make choices in life or death situations without interference, but no one should confuse that type of healthcare with the murder that is the abortion industrial complex. When a political party is offering abortions at their convention it is obvious it ain’t about healthcare, it is about division and the commoditization of death. The obvious progression is euthanasia pods, which perhaps the Democrats will feature at the 2028 Democrat Continental convention in Mexico City after Kamunist Harris annexes Canada and Mexico to “secure our border” and fight climate change.

What was that first question? I tuned in a bit late.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/petty-barbarisms-wednesday-september

Here’s a 100% accurate recreation of how the debate pretty much went:

TRUMP: “…and on the day they shot me, the sky was blue.”

DAVID MUIR: “Mr. Trump, excuse me, ABC contacted climate scientists who said the sky is black. Colors are just artifacts of light bending through the atmosphere.”

LINSEY DAVIS: “Plus clouds are white. And the Sun is yellow.”

MUIR: “And, FBI Director Wray said investigators were unable to determine whether it was a bullet, so it is inaccurate to conclude you were shot.”

DAVIS: “You know you faked it.”

And so it went, around and around, President Trump verbally sparring with ABC’s frenetic, over-caffeinated fact-checkers. Meanwhile, candidate and face actress Kamala Harris practiced looking like a mime being tortured to death with a dull potato peeler.

Kamala also said some totally forgettable stuff, not one sentence making a headline or going viral, for two reasons. First, the patently partisan moderators failed to ask Harris anything that anybody would want to know, like why she flip-flopped about some of the race’s most important issues. Even the New York Times was forced to admit the laughing candidate got lame questions and zero fact-checking that produced a boring slog:

There were almost no moments of tension between the moderators
and the Democratic candidate, Vice President Kamala Harris, and
the ABC anchors skipped several opportunities to follow up with
her on tough topics like the Biden administration's chaotic
withdrawal from Afghanistan and Ms. Harris's shifting positions on
fracking and the southern border.

Second, despite getting nothing but squishy softballs, rambling Kamala still could not answer the questions. It went kind of like this:

MUIR: “Vice President Harris, this year you took bold action that resulted in significant reductions in border crossings. Why didn’t you act on the border sooner?”

HARRIS: “You should ask Trump! He said the Ku Klux Klan were very fine people. And he said he would call for a bloodbath if he loses the election. That’s a fact. I’m not joking.”

MUIR: “Thank you, Vice President Harris, that cleared things up. President Trump, to Ms. Harris’s point, when did you start loving Adolph Hitler?”

Trump got the ‘best zinger’ award when the first time Kamala interrupted him, he snipped, “Wait a minute. I’m talking now, if you don’t mind, please. Does that sound familiar?” In the debate’s second-best moment, Trump flat called Harris a marxist — one of the few things he said last night that David and Linsey did not fact-check.

Finally, according to reports, President Trump stayed after the debate answering reporters’ questions for an hour. Cowardly Kamala fled, refusing to answer any question she hadn’t rehearsed. Fake faces, fake answers, fake performance.

gabbar says

WookieMan says

Women leaders don't want men around. Soak that in and really think about what I said. It's not a claim.

Unless there is a man who backs up the women consistently.

My point in a quick comment. Would you fight war with a women? My answer is no. They're not leaders. Some could and can be in business. Men are supposed to be bread winners, feed the family and kill if they need to. Rarely is there a woman that checks all three. My wife is the bread winner. I cook. She won't kill and would die in war. Women are not leaders is what I'm getting at.

I know few guys that wouldn't kill for their family. Not that death is the end all, but a leader needs to know the consequences of actions. Trump knows that regardless of Vietnam. I haven't been shot as someone looking to help my fellow citizens and neighbors. It does matter. He's been good with Ukraine mostly in the debate. Kamala just wants to pump more money. For what? Killing people? I don't like Ukraine or Russia. We don't need to be involved. Let Europe deal with its.

Oceans are a thing. Nothing happening to me or America.

PeopleUnited says

I think the winner of the debate was anyone fortunate enough not to see it. It was essentially not just painful but predictable and basically inconsequential.

The first debate we had a party and consumed. This one was the same. You have to drink for these things and just laugh. I think as I commented, I don't know who "won." You gotta as PA, WI, MN and MI. He wins any or all of those this is a waste of time typing. Trump would win.

WookieMan says

Would you fight war with a women? My answer is no. They're not leaders.

Yes, men's and women's brains are as different as their bodies. We're specialized for different things, because that's what worked to bring us down to the present day to even have this discussion.

Those who give women men's jobs are going to get us all killed. The god of biomechanics does not negotiate.

Patrick says

What was that first question? I tuned in a bit late.

https://modernity.news/2024/09/11/watch-rfk-jr-breaks-down-how-biased-debate-moderators-were-against-trump/

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. led the charge for the Trump camp, noting “Unfortunately, we had moderators who were clearly biased, who were constantly fact-checking Donald Trump.”

He added, “None of these whoppers that the vice president was saying, and none of her failure to really explain that, answer that first question, that very, very critical first question. They simply sat there on the sidelines and allowed that to pass.”

The first question that Kennedy is referring to was Harris refusing to answer when asked if Americans are better off now, under nearly four years of the Biden-Harris administration, or if things were better under Trump.

Instead of answering the simple yes or no question, Harris babbled and made false claims about Trump’s economic policy, which went unchallenged.

This was the trend throughout the entire debate as co-moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis peppered Trump with follow-up questions and pushback, while letting Harris dodge questions altogether.

https://babylonbee.com/cleanArticle/democrats-to-replace-kamala-on-ballot-with-abc-moderators

https://maajidnawaz.substack.com/p/trump-vs-harris-us-presidential-debate

1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True.
Muir intervenes on Kamala's behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort,
doesn't acknowledging the validity of Trump's statement, and
immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her "answer" he knows is
coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this
exchange.
2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the
morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is
omitted. No fact-check.
3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False.
Trump's "peacefully and patriotically" comments are ignored. Trump is
not charged with inciting violence. No fact check.
4) Kamala says that "some" police officers died on January 6. False.
No fact check.
5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville "Fine People" hoax. This has
been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check.

6) Kamala recites the "stand back and stand by" hoax. This is
designed to infer that Trump was ordering a "militia" to act on later
orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact
check.
7) Kamala recites the "bloodbath" hoax. Trump was talking about the
automobile industry, not violence. No fact check.
To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators:
"They did exactly what their bosses wanted."

Hitler's finally commenting on the debate:
https://youtu.be/wvRrBlSvxNw?si=jmo6MaeQFaPey3_k

For me, it was less important that KamalaToe djinn was lying and smirking, but that many people said and perceived that she was lying (and smirking). That's a difference between the debates of the past, that the demarcation between lies and truth was perceived by many of the sheeples.

I'm terrible at seeing or predicting how the debates effect the population at large since my perspective is so different (or narrow as you will). It does seem now that Trump ignited her gently and she went up in flames even for a broader (non-fake-MSM) audience and in spite of the hit man moderators.

Whether you call it waking up or whatever, it's definitely different.

Why didn't they ask Kamala about Brown's Willie?

https://www.sportskeeda.com/pop-culture/news-she-fed-questions-internet-accuses-kamala-harris-using-nova-h1-audio-earrings-debate-controversy-erupts

"She was fed the questions"— Internet accuses Kamala Harris of using Nova H1 audio earrings as debate controversy erupts...

From it, many internet sleuths have dug out Kamala Harris’ pictures wearing unique earrings, which are now being claimed as Nova H1 audio earrings. For those unacquainted, it refers to clip-on gold/silver-plated pearl earrings that double as wireless earphones and are created by Nova Products. ...

“Notice how when she reacted to something Trump said she would shortly after shift her position to an almost staged look. Or how when she would get flustered, she would suddenly stop before changing subjects. that was her listening to what she would talk about next,” wrote another.