by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 126 - 165 of 196 Next » Last » Search these comments
I think the winner of the debate was anyone fortunate enough not to see it. It was essentially not just painful but predictable and basically inconsequential.
Would you fight war with a women? My answer is no. They're not leaders.
What was that first question? I tuned in a bit late.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. led the charge for the Trump camp, noting “Unfortunately, we had moderators who were clearly biased, who were constantly fact-checking Donald Trump.”
He added, “None of these whoppers that the vice president was saying, and none of her failure to really explain that, answer that first question, that very, very critical first question. They simply sat there on the sidelines and allowed that to pass.”
The first question that Kennedy is referring to was Harris refusing to answer when asked if Americans are better off now, under nearly four years of the Biden-Harris administration, or if things were better under Trump.
Instead of answering the simple yes or no question, Harris babbled and made false claims about Trump’s economic policy, which went unchallenged.
This was the trend throughout the entire debate as co-moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis peppered Trump with follow-up questions and pushback, while letting Harris dodge questions altogether.
1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True.
Muir intervenes on Kamala's behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort,
doesn't acknowledging the validity of Trump's statement, and
immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her "answer" he knows is
coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this
exchange.
2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the
morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is
omitted. No fact-check.
3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False.
Trump's "peacefully and patriotically" comments are ignored. Trump is
not charged with inciting violence. No fact check.
4) Kamala says that "some" police officers died on January 6. False.
No fact check.
5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville "Fine People" hoax. This has
been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check.
6) Kamala recites the "stand back and stand by" hoax. This is
designed to infer that Trump was ordering a "militia" to act on later
orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact
check.
7) Kamala recites the "bloodbath" hoax. Trump was talking about the
automobile industry, not violence. No fact check.
To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators:
"They did exactly what their bosses wanted."
"She was fed the questions"— Internet accuses Kamala Harris of using Nova H1 audio earrings as debate controversy erupts...
From it, many internet sleuths have dug out Kamala Harris’ pictures wearing unique earrings, which are now being claimed as Nova H1 audio earrings. For those unacquainted, it refers to clip-on gold/silver-plated pearl earrings that double as wireless earphones and are created by Nova Products. ...
“Notice how when she reacted to something Trump said she would shortly after shift her position to an almost staged look. Or how when she would get flustered, she would suddenly stop before changing subjects. that was her listening to what she would talk about next,” wrote another.
El Yorsh tipped us off about the earrings during the debate. However, I would imagine hers are more James Bondsy than the commercial types.
Can you imagine the room full of Intel geeks with the questions ahead of time fine tuning her script in real time? And that's still the best she could do?
Would you fight war with a women? My answer is no.
but I just left the basement because of this photo and went on a night time walk.
« First « Previous Comments 126 - 165 of 196 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,248,249 comments by 14,884 users - Blue, Ceffer, ElYorsh, Onvacation, SoTex online now