by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 147 - 186 of 196 Next » Last » Search these comments
El Yorsh tipped us off about the earrings during the debate. However, I would imagine hers are more James Bondsy than the commercial types.
Can you imagine the room full of Intel geeks with the questions ahead of time fine tuning her script in real time? And that's still the best she could do?
Would you fight war with a women? My answer is no.
but I just left the basement because of this photo and went on a night time walk.
notice the media has not continuously berated Trump about this after the debate because likely it will draw attention to this video and other very similar videos
Women are always gonna lose in America for POTUS.
We can fawn over Tulsi, but she lost badly too in a primary
AD says
https://youtu.be/ImSlcxvDz4Q
notice the media has not continuously berated Trump about this after the debate because likely it will draw attention to this video and other very similar videos
But the Dumbass Democrats are. Amazing the level of political stupidity they are capable of.
I'm 41 and don't ever see a female POTUS in my lifetime. There's no talent in the pool.
I prefer 'Illuminati War' myself.
Now, as for the Harris-Trump debate, otherwise, and given the rigged features of the exercise, it’s obvious that Mr. Trump muffed several major scoring opportunities. When Ms. Harris dredged up the notorious hoax about “very fine people on both sides” in Charlottesville, Mr. Trump could have addressed the moderators, David Muir and Linsey Davis and asked them why they did not “fact-check” the utterance, which had been thoroughly debunked by the Left-wing site Snopes.com, advertising itself as “the definitive Internet reference source for researching urban legends, folklore, myths, rumors, and misinformation.” Nor did they fact check the likewise debunked “suckers and losers” hoax about US soldiers supposedly uttered by Mr. Trump at the Normandy D-Day cemetery. Actually, Muir and Davis “fact-checked” Mr. Trump over thirty times and Ms. Harris hardly at all.
In any case, Mr. Trump blew many other chances to pin Ms. Harris with her own lies and hypocrisies — like, failing to state plainly that in nearly four years she never actually visited the Mexican border (whatever her designated title was: “Border Czar,” “Root Causes Detective”) . . . failing to clarify that the president has been removed from the abortion debate altogether and has no role in telling women what to do with their own bodies under current law. . . that Ms. Harris’s voteless selection as nominee was a paradigmatic affront to “our democracy” that even her own fellow party members ought to recognize . . . that the War in Ukraine was actually started in early 2014 by Barack Obama, Victoria Nuland, and the CIA, not by Mr. Putin . . . and omitting to state that all — every last one — of the 2020 election lawsuits across the nation were dismissed on procedural grounds and not on the merits of their arguments, which were never heard in court. That’s just a short list. It is also rumored that Ms. Harris got the debate questions beforehand, since her husband, Hollywood lawyer Doug Emhoff, is a close friend of Dana Walden, Co-chair of the Disney Corporation board of directors (Disney owns ABC-News.)
Anyway, that much-awaited event is over now and we are into the homestretch of this election. Kamala Harris has still shown no disposition to meet the press, to answer any questions impromptu and unscripted. The voting public seems to be losing patience with that. Her poll numbers are sinking, despite her admirable ability to speak in declarative sentences and lead joyful laugh-fests.
« First « Previous Comments 147 - 186 of 196 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,248,248 comments by 14,884 users - 6DOF, AmericanKulak, brazil66, yoddaa online now