patrick.net

When are you up to date?
Children ages 6 months–4 years
Your child is up to date when they have received all recommended doses, including at least 1 dose of the 2024–2025 COVID-19 vaccine.
If your child previously had: Your child should get:
0 doses (was never vaccinated) 2 doses of the 2024–2025 Moderna vaccine
OR
3 doses of the 2024–2025 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine

💉 The UK Guardian ran a foul story yesterday headlined, “Covid lockdowns prematurely aged girls’ brains more than boys’, study suggests.” Thanks, experts! The cost of the government’s over-reaction to a mild seasonal flu continues surprising scientists.

The study referenced in the Guardian’s article published four days ago, in the Journal PNAS, titled “COVID-19 lockdown effects on adolescent brain structure suggest accelerated maturation that is more pronounced in females than in males.” They found girls’ brains prematurely aged by 4.5 years over the first year of the pandemic. Boys also suffered, aging 1.5 years during the same period.

The so-called “aging” —a euphemism for the medical term ‘cortical thinning’— isn’t good. It’s not like getting your driver’s license early:

More studies are needed to see whether the brain ageing affects cognitive
performance, but Kuhl notes that premature cortical thinning is linked to
early life adversity and a greater risk of neuropsychiatric disorders. Cortical
thinning is crucial for the brain to specialise, but that comes with a loss of
cognitive flexibility that could potentially affect learning.

Because high levels of stress have also been linked to similar cortical thinning effects, and because the changes were observed during between 2021 and 2022, the researchers concluded that lockdowns were the likely culprit.

In other words, this time, correlation proves causation. That sure is a flexible doctrine.

The researchers did not consider any possible effect of mRNA vaccines on teenaged brains, even though the jabs were just as temporally correlated with the cortical thinning as were lockdowns.

But at the end of the day, it doesn’t matter. Lockdowns, even if they did cause this troubling development, were just as mandated and government-caused interventions as the vaccines. In other words, either way, the government did this to us. For our own good.

No one can predict the long-term harms from this, or even whether the cortical thinning has stopped now that lockdowns are over. The researchers called for ongoing “monitoring,” suggesting they are wondering whether this temporary or transient, or could be continuing to get worse.

Sadly, further monitoring probably won’t happen, since the wrong result would further embarrass the public health establishment, which, after all, approves the research grants for such studies in the first place.

“Two weeks to flatten the curve!” And to flatten children's brains.

Safe and effective.

Mandating the injection of highly profitable experimental gene-based crap with zero long-term safety data and no definitive ingredient list into billions of healthy people, resulting in 13 million 17 million pointless deaths so far, is the worst crime against humanity ever committed.

So, how could anybody say the COVID-19 “vaccines” were “safe” if they did not have the evidence of safety and the shots had no medium or long term safety record? They could not.

On 4 June 2021 a special permission apparently was made by John Skerritt (head of the TGA) pursuant to section 42DK of the TGA act and published on the TGA website and later apparently made by “Tracey Duffy – acting Deputy Secretary, Health Products Regulation Group, Dept of Health.

These “permissions” exempted the COVID-19 “vaccines” from the time-honoured prudent principle of not ever referring to a therapeutic (drug) as being “safe”.

Here is the astounding wording:

This prohibition on the use of the word “safe” is found in section 9 of that instrument:

“9 Safe and proper use

(1) An advertisement about therapeutic goods must not contain any statement, pictorial representation or design that, expressly or by implication, represents the goods to be:

(a) safe, or without harm or side-effects; or

(b) effective in all cases, or a guaranteed cure; or

(c) infallible, unfailing, magical or miraculous.”

Now, how they got around this prohibition is by relying on Part 2, section 6 of the same Instrument, which states:

“Part 2 Application of this Code

6 Advertisements to which this Code does not apply

(1) This Code does not apply to an advertisement that is:

(a) directed exclusively to a person mentioned in section 42AA of the Act; or

(b) part of, or otherwise comprises, a public health campaign; or

(c) made in accordance with the Therapeutic Goods (Restricted Representations—COVID-19 Vaccines) Permission*(these permissions date across 2021 to 2022 regarding COVID-19 vaccines)

Note: The Therapeutic Goods (Restricted Representations—COVID-19 Vaccines) Permission 2022 is published on the Department’s website at www.tga.gov.au.”

What this appears to mean is that any advertisement/representation ‘promoting the use or supply’ of COVID-19 vaccines was exempt from the TGA Advertising Code requirements in full, including prohibitions about whether the vaccines were “safe” or not pursuant to Part 3 - Section 9.

Dave Edan with Wake Up Eire: "we'll fight and fight and never stop until we get justice"
"Dave Edan - Wakeupeire March && Information Drop - Dublin, Minister Health"
actioncovid1984, December 3, 2023
https://rumble.com/v3zdhbp-dave-edan-wakeupeire-march-and-and-information-drop-dublin-minister-health.html

DAVID EDAN: [inaudible] deliberately short speech here today, alright. But I thank you for your invitation for me to speak here today. [microphone adjusted] Yes. I thank you for your invitation for me to speak here today. I congratulate Barry[1] and his group here for the great work you've done over the past 12 months. You've woken up many people around Dublin—

[microphone adjusted again] into the— alright— [inaudible] Alright. Yeah.

I congratulate Barry and his group here for the great work you've done over the past 12 months. You've woken up many people around Dublin and throughout Ireland and saved many lives in the process.

The protests [inaudible] have been a positive impact on people's lives around this country and in other countries also.

I'm involved with Sharon Browne in an ongoing court case—

PASSERBY: [inaudible]

DAVE EDAN: Excuse me?

PASSERBY: [inaudible]

DAVE EDAN: Hey, you're the fascist. You're the fascist!

PASSERBY: [inaudible]

DAVE EDAN: Fascist scum!

PASSERBY: Have a fine day.

DAVE EDAN: Yeah, right. I'm involved with Sharon Browne[2] in an ongoing court case which is now in the Supreme Court. This is now in the Supreme Court and will be heard in the new year. We've 20 grounds for appeal to the Supreme Court, right? Now we've 9 pages from Pfizer[3] which detail 1,200 types of illness, death, and disability caused with the Pfizer vaccine. And this has been released on a court order in the United States. We've shown that to the high court, and we show the judge Twomey [4] also, and we're going to show to the Supreme Court judges all five.

Now we're going to say, ask them, is that a fact or it's conspiracy theory? That's the first order of business in the Supreme Court. And I have those 9 pages here today. And you're free to view them if you wish.

Now we're going to hopefully get a response from the Supreme Court judges on that and we're going to settle that matter first before you do anything else in the Supreme Court.

Then we're going to show them another page in that same Pfizer document detailing thousands of illnesses, disabilities, and types of death caused in the first 90 days of the Pfizer vaccine. And we're going to [inaudible] each Supreme Court judge on that before— That's the next order of business in the Supreme Court.

So we also urge all vaccine victims, right, to take legal cases of your own.

FEMALE VOICE: Yeah.

DAVE EDAN: In the High Court and then the Criminal Courts, right? Now myself and Sharon and a few of the people can supply you with evidence, that's prima facie evidence, scientists and medical doctors who can testify as expert witnesses in court for you. Now this will be extremely important if you wish to win your case in the High Court and your case in the Criminal Court. Now you need to start civil proceedings first, right, through your own solicitors and then bring criminal proceedings via your solicitor and the Gardaí.[5]

Both the civil case and the criminal case will run together and in parallel in the courts. In other words they run at the same time. If Gardaí refused to cooperate or to take statements from you, then get your solicitor to write to senior Gardaí and get your solicitor to apply to the High Court for an order performance by the Gardaí. This will force the Gardaí to investigate and prosecute the case in the court.

Now at the moment a lot of vaccine victims have been fobbed off by the Gardaí, including senior Gardaí. Now the best way to deal with the Gardaí who are reluctant to do their job is to bring them into the High Court and get an order of mandamus, an order of performance against the Gardaí, force them to perform their duties, and force them and to bring a prosecution against those people who've poisoned the people of Ireland with these vaccines.

That's the best way to proceed. And if anyone wants to meet me later, I can help them do that.

The Gardaí are there as guardians of the peace to do their job, they're not there to cover up crimes. And if they do try to cover up crimes, it's into the High Court we'll all go and into the Supreme Court we'll all go. And we'll fight and fight and never stop until we get justice here in the country.

MANY VOICES: Hear, hear!

DAVE EDAN: Now there's an election coming up in 2024. I urge everybody here, or as many people as possible to register as independents and to run as independents in the elections. That will give you the facility to go door to door and tell the voters about the many thousands of Irish people who are injured, made ill, disabled, or have lost their lives or lost loved ones from these covid 19 vaccines. So that brings it to people's doorsteps.

So I urge you to bring it door to door in this election. And every constituency of Ireland. And show, and show them your leaflets, show them your, your, your banners, your posters, at each door. And that's how you defeat RTE[2] and the corrupt press and media here in this country. You've got to, you've got to win over the hearts and the minds of the Irish people and nation.

Now it's very important that the voters on the doorsteps learn about these, the excess mortality because these people, these excess mortality are somebody's wives, somebody's sons, somebody's daughters, somebody's mothers, somebody's fathers. They've lost precious loved ones here in this country.

I think most people here have lost somebody, you know, at some stage from this vaccine, or will lose loved ones very soon. So we've got to get, we've got to get into the faces of the voters and say, look, if you vote for us, we'll help you get justice. We'll implement a new system here in this country, where a new legal system, a new political system, where everybody's held to account. Everybody's fully accountable. And if they don't comply with the law, it's into jail they'll go. And if necessary, we'll build new jails to house them.

MANY VOICES: Hear, hear!

FEMALE VOICE; Hear, hear, many of them!

DAVE EDAN: Now another point. And this is also part of the election process. You all need to confront elected politicians wherever you find them. OK? You need to meet them face to face. Show them the leaflets, engage in a debate and, and, and peaceful protest. And I urge for peaceful protest in their faces. They're there to represent you, right? Under Article VI of the Irish Constitution all elected Irish politicians of the government are accountable to you, to us, the people. They're not accountable to the World Economic Forum or to the, to the European Union. They're accountable to we the people. If you look up Article VI of the Irish Constitution.

Now I would urge people to, to push this excess mortality issue, which— these 18,000 people, extra, extra people have died and it's under these vaccines, that's 18,000 above the natural rate, which is the excess mortality. The politicians need to feel very nervous about that. And you people need to go out there and make every elected politician feel very nervous, very, and, and, you know, make them feel apprehension, right, about all of this. And, and, and get in their face, and they will stop— keep, keep at them. Hunt them. Hunt them night and day with the truth. Don't give them any rest.

OK, I'll leave it at that. OK, thank you.

SCROLLING TEXT ON SCREEN: production
Action-Covid-1984
Robert Pieryzński Photojournalist
https://rpphotojounralist.org/
organizer
WakeUpEire
https://www.wakeupeire.com/

💉💉 Fox News ran a fascinating story yesterday headlined, “Former NIH official accused of making emails 'disappear' pleads Fifth to COVID subcommittee.” Ironically, pandemic-era NIH emails obtained through FOIA described NIH public records employee Margaret Moore as “the lady who helps make emails disappear.” She was subpoenaed to testify to the House Pandemic Committee and decided (wisely) to plead her Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination.




The NIH covid expert who mentioned Ms. Moore’s email disappearing skills, Dr. David Morens, later claimed he was just joking. Haha! Good one!

Like many pandemic-era officials, Margaret has now retired, so she can’t be compelled to testify in her official capacity, making it harder for the committee to get her to talk. But in order to successfully assert a Fifth Amendment defense, at some point the witness is required to identify what crime they believe they could be incriminated for. I can’t wait.

Pacific Eclipse predicted a range of changes that COVID-19 would bring to the globe.

The prescience and timeliness of this meeting, held on December 9th and 10th 2019, was extraordinary. Within a month, those attending the meeting, would be facing the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, hopefully implementing many of the lessons learnt.

Event 201 - widely recognized as the “COVID rehearsal” held on 18 October 2019 in NYC - is familiar to many.

The pandemic tabletop exercise was hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundations and the World Economic Forum.

Pacific Eclipse was a high-level (but low-profile) pandemic simulation held on 9-10 December 2019, conducted by the U.S. Department of Defense in collaboration with key academic institutions in Anglosphere countries.

The scenario was specifically adapted for the US 2020 presidential election year (!!!) ...

The ability of these experts to ‘anticipate’ [a phony-baloney crisis in which they’re heavily invested] is truly extraordinary!

They even ‘predicted’ the COVID scenes with cruise ships…

And then: Enter - the miraculous ‘vaccines’ (versus ‘vaccine hesitancy’)…

So there you have it: Just before COVID kicked off in a super-charged US presidential year and an anticipated second term for Trump (and overwhelming momentum in the UK to “Get Brexit Done”) the Five Eyes nations held a clandestine meeting of multi-level pandemic “stakeholders” across government, academia and industry - led by the US DoD and assorted university experts - and ran a “tabletop exercise” that more or less accurately predicted the desired ‘COVID response’ (of those present).

Is it possible that Event 201 was a modified limited hangout, and the real tabletop exercise - Pacific Eclipse - took place later, in private, just before Operation COVID-19 was officially launched, whereby a manufactured emergency then had the ‘anticipated’ effect of political destablization, particularly in the US and the UK?

This all looks very much like a smoking gun… nearly five years later.

Pharmaceutical giant Moderna has been caught offering children cash rewards for taking part in medical trials to test experimental Covid mRNA “booster” shots.

The company representatives were found to be using WhatsApp messages to minors in the UK.

The UK Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA) launched an investigation into the vaccine makers over complaints that Moderna was offering money to children between the ages of 12 and 18.

The WhatsApp messages offered children £1,500 ($1,962) each in return for being injected with experimental Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

The PMCPA ruled that the offer amounted to “inappropriate financial inducement.” ...

Moderna must provide a written undertaking that the practice will “cease forthwith” and pay for administrative costs.

The pharmaceutical company was also ordered to pay a £14,000 ($18,310) fine.

However, critics said that the sanction was too small to be effective.

Esther McVey MP, formerly of the APPG on COVID-19 vaccine damage said:

“A charge of £14,000 to a company that enjoyed a total revenue of $6.8 billion in 2023 is hardly likely to make them think twice before breaking the rules again.”

Dr. Vinay Prasad: No Amnesty for the COVID Tyrants

"I don't believe in forgiveness because in my opinion, these pieces of shit are still lying. I mean, like if you want forgiveness, the first thing you have to say is what you actually did wrong, and they're still fucking lying."

MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: Like peanut butter.

BELINDA: Yeah, yeah! They say, stay away from it and we won't let anyone else bring to school either, you know? But in this case, if it's an ingredient in the covid vaccination that you're severely allergic to, the advice actually is, to go to a tertiary hospital to have it where they will have an anesthetist on standby to resuscitate you. Yep. So that's what I've been told by numerous—

MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: Can you say that again a little slower so I can process what you just said?

BELINDA: [laughs] Yeah, so basically, if what you're allergic to is something in the covid vaccination, the usual advice of avoid it is not, you know, applicable. The advice is go to a tertiary hospital and they will have an anesthetist ready to resuscitate you after you've had your vaccine.

MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: And that's the advice from the government.

BELINDA: Well, it's the doctors, that's, so you know, yeah, any doctors I did try and get, you know like an exemption. So yeah.

MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: And they wouldn't give it to you.

BELINDA: No, no, no, I wouldn't get an exemption. Like, there was one— like, because they're all scared of losing their jobs as well and getting deregistered because if you, any registered health practitioner, I mean, I knew nurses and midwives for years and years and years, if we say anything that goes against what was in the government's, you know, little book like this, of all the vaccinations and that, if you say anything, basically you can be deregistered, fined, jailed, so, and doctors that had given out too many exemptions, even in the past before covid hit, have been removed from the register.

So yeah there was a doctor that probably would have liked to have given me one but he did refer me to a couple of specialists that, you know, because immunologists and allergy specialists are the people that are able to give vaccine exemptions, but yeah, the people where I was going they were this, yeah, like it was still the same advice from them, to kind of, yeah, have it and get rescusitated afterwards, thank you very much.

MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: Is it just me? Or does that sound mad?

BELINDA: Ah, look, that, that's just absolutely crazy. I mean, look, the whole thing, the craziness thing that sticks out to me, is being a health professional, one of the first things you get taught in your training is that you cannot do anything to anyone without their consent. For a consent to be valid, it has to be given freely, with all the information provided, and without coercion. If it was coerced in any way, it's not valid. So technically, in the eyes of the law, if you do something after coercing someone, you have committed assault.

Professor Dr. Aditi Bhargava, Molecular Biologist at UCSF, Explains Why Mandates Make No Sense
"US Senator Ron Johnson Holds Expert Panel On Federal Vaccine Mandates - Nov 2 2021"
https://rumble.com/vu8wa4-us-senator-ron-johnson-holds-expert-panel-on-federal-vaccine-mandates.html

SENATOR RON JOHNSON: Next we will go to Dr. Aditi Bhargava. Dr. Bhargava's a professor in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in the Center for Reproductive Sciences at University of California San Francisco. Dr. Bhargava.

ADITI BHARGAVA, PHD: Thank you for, thank you for the invitation. My name is Aditi Bhargava. I'm a professor at UCSF and a molecular biologist of 33 years of research experience. These are my scientific views.

Covid 19 vaccines are often compared to polio vaccines. This is apples to orange comparison because RNA and DNA viruses are fundamentally different. DNA viruses mutate at a very slow rate. DNA viruses induce lifelong immunity. After a natural infection with DNA viruses such as the polio or chickenpox, no one needs to be vaccinated or develops the disease in their lifetime.

In contrast, RNA viruses mutate frequently and do not induce lifelong immunity, as we have seen
with SARS-CoV-2 or flu viruses. One can have influenza multiple times in their life, vaccines or no vaccines. Flu has not been eradicated, nor is there any talk to eradicate it. There is no herd immunity for flu. It is simply not an achievable goal.

Safety issues with vaccines happen despite best of intentions. There are no drugs without side effects. For example, measles and rotavirus vaccines have been recalled due to safety concerns
despite stringent clinical trials and years of data.

Unlike other drug trials, vaccine trials are different as they are tested on a largely healthy population to prevent infection.

Next slide please.

[Title of slide: Natural immunity is unmatched, and many have it][1]
[screenshot]

Good vaccines are modeled to mimic natural infection and rely on one's own immune system to produce antibodies and provide protection. Natural immunity is the gold standard. CDC estimates that nearly 43% of the country is already infected with SARS-CoV-2 and thus naturally immune. And that was all before the more transmissible delta variant took hold.

Living in a bubble of sterile conditions is counterproductive to everything we know about strengthening the immune system. It's Immunology 101. To downplay the beneficial and protective powers of our immune system goes against the founding principles of immunology.

Several studies about SARS-CoV-2 are validating that knowledge. There is no documented case of a naturally immune person getting reinfected with severe disease or hospitalization despite the first case reported nearly two years ago. In sharp contrast, there are thousands of cases of severe covid, hospitalization and deaths, in fully vaccinated people.

CDC now estimates 90% of Americans over the age of 16 have antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. But vaccine-induced antibodies are only a small fraction of immune responses. New studies from the British Health Ministry suggest that covid vaccines might interfere with the ability of our immune system to produce antibodies against other parts of the virus, crucial aspect for developing cross-protection. The spike antibodies are incomplete and cherry-picked story.

Vaccine-induced protection fell to 33 to 42% within 3 months. That is no different than the protection the unvaccinated have. Hence mandates to prevent spread by using spike antibody levels as gold standard is gross misrepresentation of data.

[Title of slide: CurrentCOVID-19 vaccine efficacy and safety][2]

It should not have taken the Massachusetts break through infection in the summer to discover that fully vaccinated people are just as vulnerable to being infected and transmit SARS-CoV-2 as the unvaccinated.

Had the trials been stringent, had the Phase II and III stuck to the protocols of follow up, had the regulators enforced manufacturers to study prevention of infection in their clinical trials, this fiasco could have been avoided.

Instead, manufacturers configured these trials to study the prevention of mild symptoms and used preclinical models such as the recent monkeys in whom the virus does not cause disease.

If all we can do is to prevent symptoms and severe disease, we should be talking about drugs to treat covid, not vaccines and mandates.

We lost the opportunity of discovering these major shock coming by torpedoing the clinical trials when placebo groups were eliminated just two months after the second dose.

Instead we are learning through trials and errors on hundreds of millions of people, and we insist on eliminating a very important control group by these vaccine mandates.

There is no scientific study or experimental design in which we can learn anything of value without a control group, certainly not about safety and efficacy.

Persistent high levels of antibodies often indicate pathologies to the body's immune system. That is the basis of autoimmune disease. Hence boosters' long term adverse events should be weighed seriously.

The notion that we are in an emergency nearly two years after the pandemic and that should justify cutting corners or taking shortcuts is simply wrong. Trust in scientific method is at stake.

Media reports often state the science is clear. But scientific publications do not claim that the science is clear.

And as you've heard from various testimonies real people suffered serious adverse events and perhaps lifelong disabilities due to sloppy trials.[4]

I will conclude by asking you, if the vaccines don't prevent infection and transmission, surely mandating person A to protect person B is pointless. But if the vaccines are effective in preventing infection, transmission, decreased symptoms, hospitalization rates, and death, then what do the vaccinated fear?

‘The Covid debacle over the past nearly five years vividly displays how so many willingly ‘followed orders’, and uncritically accepted the Covid narrative of a ‘killer virus’ that didn’t actually kill most people…

This is shown to most devastating effect by the collaboration of the medical profession, with doctors, nurses and pharmacists willing to engage with coercive and mandatory vaccination, betraying their legal, ethical and moral obligation to ensure voluntary informed consent for vaccination, as per any medical intervention.

The medical profession was effectively conscripted to inject the population, with many vaccinators participating wholeheartedly in the destruction of personal autonomy and bodily integrity via coercive and mandatory vaccination.

The medical profession should have refused to collaborate with a plan that ostracised people who refused to submit to the injections, from ‘No Jab, No Job’ to ‘No Jab, No Life’.

Why did so many willingly ‘follow orders’ to inject without question?

Why did so few medical folk openly resist this travesty, which supported excluding from society critical-thinking people who refused to submit to this bodily assault?

This isn’t just about the vaccinators who inserted the needle. Other members of the medical profession not directly involved with vaccination stayed silent, despite witnessing obvious wrongdoing under coercion and mandates - the violation of voluntary informed consent for vaccination. They too ‘followed orders’ with their cowardly silence. ...

‘Covid’ was used as a cover to make the global population compliant, imposing subservience via on demand lockdowns, vaccination, testing, quarantine, and masking/muzzling, with people in many countries, e.g. Australia, having to ‘show papers’ to work and participate in society via the infamous ‘vaccine passport’.

It appears ‘Covid’ was an integral part of a plot to install a global totalitarian regime via the WHO, the UN, the World Economic Forum, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Five Eyes, and others, to control and exploit the entire global population.

The collaboration of the medical profession was a key part of this dastardly plan that included capturing the population for eternal compliance to vaccination, testing, and masking/muzzling edicts, and constant surveillance.

The medical profession was conscripted to ‘follow orders’ that went against their legal, ethical and moral duty to obtain voluntary informed consent.

The National Citizens Inquiry is a citizen-led and citizen-funded effort to examine Canada’s response to COVID-19, among other important topics.
The NCI’s purpose is to listen, to learn, and to recommend. What went right? What went wrong? How can Canadians and our governments react to national crises in the future in a manner that balances the interests, needs and rights of all members of our society?
The NCI is volunteer run and completely independent of government.

The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer's Crimes Against Humanity

Our book, The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer’s Crimes Against Humanity, was published two days ago; it is already a bestseller. This is a book that three governments — the US, the UK and Australia — all sought to suppress. The story of how it came to be is extraordinary — 3250 highly credentialed doctors and scientists under the leadership of one extraordinary woman, Amy Kelly, worked for two years on the 450,000 internal Pfizer documents released under court order by a successful lawsuit by attorney Aaron Siri. In the process these volunteers confirmed the greatest crime against humanity of all time. ...

Many people who took this injection, as it was launched in 2020–2021–2022 and to the present, did not realize that normal testing for safety of a new vaccine—testing that typically takes ten to twelve years—had simply been bypassed via the mechanisms of a “state of emergency” and the FDA’s “Emergency Use Authorization.” They did not understand that the real “testing” was in fact Pfizer and the FDA observing whatever was happening to them and their loved ones, after these citizens rolled up their sleeves and submitted to the shot. As we can never forget, many millions of these people who submitted to the injection were “mandated” to take it, facing the threat of job loss, suspension of their education, or loss of their military positions if they refused; in some US states and overseas countries, people also faced the suspension of their rights to take transportation, cross borders, go to school or college, receive certain medical procedures, or enter buildings such as churches and synagogues, restaurants and gyms—if they refused. ...

Thousands of people with arthritis-type joint pain, one of the most common side effect, were recorded. Other thousands with muscle pain, the second most common. Then, industrial-scale blood diseases: blood clots, lung clots, leg clots; thrombotic thrombocytopenia, a clotting disease of the blood vessels; vasculitis (the destruction of blood vessels via inflammation); astronomical rates of neurological disorders—dementias, tremors, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, epilepsies. Horrific skin conditions. A florid plethora of cardiac issues; myocarditis, pericarditis, tachycardia, arrhythmia, and so on. Half of the serious adverse events related to the liver, including death, took place within seventy-two hours of the shot. Half of the strokes took place within forty-eight hours of injection.

But what really emerged from the first forty-six reports, was the fact that though COVID is ostensibly a respiratory disease, the papers did not focus on lungs or mucus membranes, but rather they center, creepily and consistently, on disrupting human reproduction. ...

Pfizer enumerated the menstrual damages it knew it was causing to thousands of women, and the damage ranges from women bleeding every day, to having two periods a month, to no periods at all; to women hemorrhaging and passing tissue; to menopausal and post-menopausal women beginning to bleed again. Pfizer’s scientists calmly observed and noted it all but did not tell women.

Babies suffered and died. In one section of the documents, over 80 percent of the pregnancies followed resulted in miscarriage or spontaneous abortion. In another section of the documents, two newborn babies died, and Pfizer described the cause of death as “maternal exposure” to the vaccine.

Pfizer knew that vaccine materials entered vaccinated moms’ breast milk and poisoned babies. Four women’s breast milk turned “blue-green.” Pfizer produced a chart of sick babies, made ill from breastfeeding from vaccinated moms, with symptoms ranging from fever to edema (swollen flesh) to hives to vomiting. One poor baby had convulsions and was taken to the ER, where it died of multi-organ system failure.

If you have been following my Substacks over the last year you would know about plasmids which are circular bits of synthetic DNA added to large volume bacterial fermentation vats to code for and produce commercial quantities of complicated biological products (eg mRNA used in COVID-19 “vaccines”). Plasmids have been known for many years and used as a tool for many years as an efficient way to produce biochemicals by fermentation, rather than direct chemical synthesis, on an industrial scale.

Unfortunately, circular DNA plasmids are known to be toxic and there are specific drug regulatory guidelines to direct the removal of such plasmids from pharmaceutical products that used plasmids in their manufacture.

Here is the problem. The circular DNA plasmids used in the manufacture of both the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 “vaccines” used, in part, a genetic sequence from the African Green Monkey Simian Virus called SV40 promoter - a component which we now know caused cancer as far back as 1951 in relation to their use in a disastrous polio vaccine which had to be withdrawn (Cutter Incident).

In relation to the COVID-19 “vaccines”, initially, the drug regulators were not told of the presence of SV40 used by the manufacturers in their DNA plasmids and now that the drug regulators do know, the drug regulators are withholding information about this from the public and they have ignored calls for the withdrawal of the shots. I don’t know how long the drug regulators will be able to avoid investigation and potential prosecution.

Forced vaccination under sedation

Doctors, nurses and the courts acting as agents of the state

Can you imagine a situation today in which someone would be secretly sedated to force them to be vaccinated?

Well, after the past five years of ‘public health’ terrorism, and coercive and mandated COVID-19 vaccination, anything is possible…

But what sort of doctor or nurse would participate in such a heinous act, to forcibly inject someone who does not want the intervention?

How can they morally volunteer to commit such a crime which violates consent?

Consider this shocking story about ‘Adam’ and his mother ‘Catherine’, reported behind the paywall of the UK Telegraph, 28 September 2024 - reporter is Steve Bird:



"As a “thank you” for having a mug of breakfast tea and a glass of orange juice brought into his room, Adam invariably hugged the staff he trusts so implicitly at his care home.

Unbeknown to him, on five separate occasions over the last 16 months those drinks were laced with a “covert anxiolytic medication” – a powerful sedative. Twice he became groggy before eventually succumbing to a deep sleep.

Each time, a team of senior carers, a nurse and the home’s manager stood quietly outside the room awaiting the nod to enter. One of them was armed with a syringe – kept well hidden due to Adam’s needle phobia - loaded with the Covid vaccine.

When the sedatives worked, Adam’s sleeve was quickly rolled up, the antiseptic wipe swiped over his upper arm and the needle inserted deep into his muscle as the plunger was pressed emptying the syringe barrel of its viscous contents. One carer made copious notes in readiness for a report which would be sent to the Court of Protection explaining how the procedure had gone.

On two occasions, in November 2023 and June 2024, the primary dose and booster were administered, one carer then had the arduous task of telephoning Adam’s mother to inform her that despite her opposition her son had been vaccinated."

Forced vaccination under sedation

Doctors, nurses and the courts acting as agents of the state

Can you imagine a situation today in which someone would be secretly sedated to force them to be vaccinated?

UK judge rules severely learning disabled man with a heart condition to be force-jabbed

https://rumble.com/v3zjevs-forced-vaccinations-on-our-loved-ones-toms-story-update.html

Hat tip: https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/uk-pm-rishi-sunak-surprised-the-covid

Tom's case in the UK was reported by Abi Roberts on her Substack, Abi Daily. See "For the Love of Tom" February 12, 2024
https://abiroberts.substack.com/p/for-the-love-of-tom

TOM'S MOTHER: I've been through the court of protection twice. Both judges have said that Tom was to receive the covid vaccination. We sought a specialist's advice, a professor, in his words, based on the principle first do no harm, it would be a breech of medical ethics to administer the covid 19 vaccine to Tom.

His conclusions, "In my opinion there is significant risk to exposing Tom to the current covid vaccines."

Tom's doctor, she refused, stating that it is unethical.

I got contacted directly from the solicitors to say that they had received the primary course of the vaccination which is Pfizer, and that they had their own doctor to administer it. She has stated that she has seen the professor's report and that she's
still happy to go ahead with administering the vaccine to Tom.

She has written to me directly and given me three dates to choose from.

It's— obviously concerns me a great deal that a doctor has received a professional specialist's statement and she's still happy to administer it.

They expect me to walk my son into a room knowing that something will be injected into him that could potentially harm him or kill him. To be honest I just find it so cruel what they're doing.

She informed me there would be two people in the room and that I could attend but if I showed any sort of resistance then they'd ask me to leave the room.

MALE VOICE OFF-CAMERA: What would you say to her?

TOM'S MOTHER: Well, it can only come from the heart. It would be an emotional plea, really, huh, that I don't understand why she feels that he has to have it and why it wouldn't be a danger to him as he's already had covid and more than once. He has natural immunity.

We have a crowdjustice page[1] that I read every single comment. And I just want to thank everyone so much for, for helping.

[1] Screen shows a screenshot of crowdjustice page entitled "Forced Vaccinations On Our Loved Ones by Tom's Mother"
"My boy Tom was born with severe learning difficulties and a heart condition. Age 22 but with mental age of about 18 months I care for Tom asa a single parent. I love him with all my heart."

https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/tom/

Personnel would be happy to do this for the economic capping incentive. After all, they did it under the aegis of higher authority.