patrick.net

Remember that, we are advocating now for a pause on the vaccine schedule. In America, it needs to be reevaluated.

The contents of the vaccine schedule need to be re-evaluated, but also, its very existence, its construction, its justification, its scheduling, everything- needs to be questioned. And that means we need a pause. Because it is probably damaging lots and lots of children.

Advocate for strict liability on all Pharmaceutical products, and that's really something that lawyers understand, everybody understands. It's a really simple way to fix this problem. It gets rid of almost like 90 percent of the problem from the very beginning, to just say, strict liability.

💉💉 Speaking of ridiculous ideas, this week the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research sprayed a truth weapon into big pharma’s rosy skies, in the form of a new study by Children’s Health Defense researchers (Robert Kennedy’s outfit) titled, “Adverse Outcomes Are Increased with Exposure to Added Combinations of Infant Vaccines.” Not just a little increase in adverse outcomes. A lot.




It’s critical to first understand that vaccine makers are not required to test for interactions with other vaccines, or test for problems associated with combined simultaneous injections of multiple vaccines. So, this study did the work that neither pharma nor the FDA have ever done, but should have, using easily available information.

Well, the information is easily available, that is, if you can find a cooperative government somewhere. In this case, the researchers did find a cooperative government willing to share its priceless Medicaid data: Florida. I do not know what led to Florida cooperating with Children’s Health Defense researchers, but I suspect our terrific Surgeon General Joe Ladapo was involved.

Using decades of data from Florida’s Medicaid database, the CHD researchers evaluated adverse events arising among 1.5 million combinations of six vaccines injected into infants between July 1, 1991, and May 31, 2011.

Let’s start with the study’s awful but deplorably predictable conclusion: “Chiefly, the greater the number of vaccines in the combination yields an exponentially greater number of disease diagnoses.”

In English: the more vaccines they gave infants at the same time, the worse the infants did.

Among other wretched findings, the researchers observed that infants who got six early vaccines were three thousand percent more likely to be diagnosed with "other diseases of the trachea and bronchus" within 30 days after vaccination, compared to infants who only got the three basic vaccines (DTaP+IPV+HIB).

The researchers tracked three categories of enhanced risk: developmental problems, additional infections, and respiratory complications.

The highest developmental risk was for "failure to thrive," which six-shot infants were +366% more likely to experience. The highest infections risk (of many) was for leukocytosis (high white blood cell count). Infants who got the HepB-Rota vaccine on top of the three basic ones were a whopping ten thousand times more likely to have leukocytosis. And under respiratory problems, infants who got all three extra vaccines were also three thousand times more likely to be diagnosed with "other diseases of the trachea and bronchus" within 30 days after the jabs.

This is all very interesting, but don’t jump to conclusions. Remember what they always tell us: correlation isn’t causation. All those extra sicknesses could have caused the vaccinations. It could go either way. You never know.

You’d have to be a pretty sick person to help pharma hide this kind of information. But it’s been hidden for a long time. The data is all right there, in the state insurance databases. They have the records when doctors submit claims for the initial vaccinations. They also have the records when doctors later submit claims for treating the same patients’ adverse events.

But patient-level data has always been guarded — for “privacy” — more diligently than the gold bullion in Fort Knox.

In a sane world, this study would blow the lid right off the infant vaccine business. Scientists would spring into action, trying to recreate these results in the other forty-nine states. But this is not a sane world; this is 2024 Clown World.

So, this study represents more progress, another scientific nail driven into the vaccine industrial complex’s mouldy coffin. But it shows that the dam is leaking badly. Big pharma’s vaccine dam could break any minute now.

Finally, this study could not have been done, much less published, four years ago. It’s serious progress.

This study evaluates 1,542,076 vaccine combinations administered to infants (less than 1 year of age at time of vaccination) between July 1st, 1991 and May 31st, 2011. ...

We produce a systematic analysis of the 7 cohorts and discover adverse outcomes associated with vaccine combinations, as well as describe adverse trends based on the increasing number of vaccines administered.

Overall they found that as the number of shots given to infants in a single doctor’s visit increased, the number of developmental respiratory or infectious disease diagnoses within 30 days of the shots increased exponentially.

Each additional shot more than doubled the number of those different diseases diagnosed.

When Covid injections were added to the mix, sudden deaths soared. ...

The researchers are now calling on governments to pull the Covid shots from public use.

Good medical news emerged yesterday in the form of a UK Daily Mail article headlined, “Scientists discover 'exciting' link between autism and gut bacteria.” They are so close.

The article reported on a new Hong Kong study published this week in Nature Microbiology titled, “Multikingdom and functional gut microbiota markers for autism spectrum disorder.”

Back in the 1990’s, Dr. Andrew Wakefield was hounded out of medicine for claiming that autism was caused by childhood vaccines destroying essential gut bacteria. Like the doctor who removed the well pump handle to stop a cholera epidemic, Wakefield will never get his good reputation back. Just forget about it.

They will never ever admit the jab connection. But now that a mechanism of injury has been identified, there might be new hope to somehow treat kids and adults injured by baffling, mysterious, unidentified “environmental factors.”

I’ve suspected for years that pediatricians are incentivized to push vaccines but I never had any proof. Just snippets of information here and there…and memes floating around Facebook. Then I ran across Dr. Paul Thomas. He lays out the receipts with real numbers for a typical pediatrician. Pretty mind blowing stuff.

Click on the video to watch. (26 minutes) Or if you don’t have time, he was losing over a million dollars a year in a $4 million annual practice, because he wasn’t forcing patients to get vaccinated. By combing through this receipts and adding up all the money he missed out on from vaccines not given, he came up with a figure of over a million dollars. He explains the whole process here.

Pediatrician Raises Alarm over Bill Gates’ Plan to Vaccinate 500 Million Children by 2030

A prominent pediatrician is speaking out to warn the public about Bill Gates’s $11.9 billion plan to vaccinate a staggering 500 million children over the next few years.

The multi-billion dollar plan was recently announced by Gates’s organization Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.

Gavi revealed that the $11.9B plan, which includes $9 billion in new funding, aims to vaccinate 500M children by 2030.

The organization says the kids will be vaccinated with existing shots and “new vaccines” that are currently in development.

In an interview with The Defender, Dr. Paul Thomas, a pediatrician and co-author of the upcoming book, “Vax Facts: What to Consider Before Vaccinating at All Ages & All Stages of Life,” warns that the plan is dangerous.

Clinical Trials of Childhood Vaccines: No Placebo-Controlled Long-Term Trials

Not a single routine childhood vaccine was licensed based on a long-term placebo-controlled trial. Not one. See the carefully created and fully referenced chart at https://icandecide.org/no-placebo which was compiled by our firm with funding from the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN).

No, she was eating normally. We did not notice a difference there at all. But the constant thirst, constant thirst and, you know, needing the bathroom a lot. And then, again, like I said, you know, she was seven years old, you know, been potty trained for a really long time and was having accidents. She couldn't control it.
Now signs of DKA look a lot like flu. So fever, nausea, that kind of thing. So that's why sometimes it's hard to miss, you know, people just think, you know, they're sick. That's all.
You get this diagnosis and do you immediately know it's linked to the vaccinations or do you have to do some research on that?
That came to my attention probably a few months later. I happened to meet someone, hi Meg, online who kind of, because I was desperate to look for natural ways to handle this disease. I knew it wasn't, you know, going to be a cure, but there were probably some kind of support.
And so I was looking in different places and I finally came across her and together we kind of started talking because her son had been diagnosed just a few months prior to Alice. We've never met in person. But anyway, together we kind of discovered that it was on the insert of the MMR as an adverse effect.
From there, you know, we both kind of started looking into different documentaries and things like that, you know, getting angry with each other, right? I mean, not at each other, but, you know, together at the situation and, you know, figuring out what do we do next? Because, yeah, no, we're not doing this ever again.
They're not going to get neither. She is three. None of our kids were ever going to be vaccinated again. Yeah.

•SIDS “mysteriously” clusters at 2 to 4 months of age—which is also when children happen to receive the vaccines most strongly associated with causing SIDS (e.g., the TDwP pertussis vaccine). Many doctors and patients noticed this, but it has been relentlessly dismissed by the medical industrial complex.

•As far back as 1933, case reports were produced of children experiencing brain damage and then infant death shortly after the TDwP shot. (e.g., a 1978 report that studied 15 million TDwP injections linked numerous cases of the vaccine to brain damage and death).

•A 1982 study that was inspired by observing 4 cases of SIDS within 19 hours of the TDwP vaccine that then studied 200 randomly selected SIDS cases. They found most of infants had been vaccinated prior to death (6.5% within 12 hours of vaccination, 26% within 3 days, 37% within a week, 61% within two weeks, and 70% within 3 weeks), with death typically following brief periods of irritability, crying, lethargy, upper respiratory tract symptoms, and sleep disturbance. Additionally, their autopsy findings were relatively consistent (e.g. petechiae of lung, pleura, pericardium, and thymus; vascular congestion; pulmonary edema; pneumonitis; and brain edema).

• Japan's decision to delay the scheduled DTwP vaccination by 20 months resulted in an 85-90% reduction in the instances of SIDS.

•When SIDS cases at morgues are examined, they cluster at precisely 2, 4, or 6 months of age (rather than spread throughout the 2 to 6 month period).

•Prior to the mass vaccination programs in America, SIDS was very rare (to the point few were even aware crib death occurred), but rapidly spiked (to the point a new diagnosis category had to be made) after national mass vaccination and before long became the leading cause of death in the first 12 months of life.

•A 2011 study showed there is a direct correlation between how many vaccines a country gives their children and their infant mortality rate.

•The National Vaccine Injury Act was passed in response to growing public outrage over DTwP deaths due to NBC airing a national story on the dangers of this vaccine (something which would never air in the more corrupt media of today)...

•When COVID happened, many in the vaccine safety community predicted the lockdowns would lead to a massive drop in SIDS cases (since children were skipping their non-essential vaccine appointments). As I show here, this indeed was what happened (and likewise happened shortly after in Florida once large numbers of parents opted out of routine vaccination). To this day, no explanation has ever been provided for this mysterious decline in SIDS.

Presently, the following is known about vaccines and SIDS:

•The more vaccines are given concurrently, and the more premature an infant is, the more likely they are to die after vaccination (e.g., I summarized 4 studies showing the former and 14 showing the latter here).

•In many cases, this death can be observed to be preceded by intermittent cessations of breathing and a slowed heart rate. In many cases, when children are in the NICU (which is often the case for premature infants), their breathing can be observed to become interrupted following vaccination (e.g., I summarized 12 studies that observed this here).

•Those results inspired investigators to begin testing respiration function in infants at home with home monitoring systems, and from that, it was observed that TDaP frequently led to intermittent interruptions of breathing.

All of this, in short, suggests that vaccination can interrupt the automatic breathing mechanism and that when this happens at home (rather than in a hospital where it can be flagged by the monitors and the infant saved with CPR), those babies die.

Presently, I believe this occurs because vaccines, due to their impairment of the physiologic zeta potential, often cause microstrokes in the brain that can be easily detected by basic neurologic evaluations (discussed further here). These microstrokes result from a critical threshold being passed, which helps to explain why premature infants (who are smaller) are less able to tolerate standard vaccine doses, and why more vaccines being given concurrently are more likely to cause this to happen.

As it happens, the most vulnerable area of the brain to these microstrokes is the region that allows the eyes to move outwards. In turn, a loss of smooth outwards tracking of the eyes is one of the most common vaccine injuries (e.g., this happened to many people I know following COVID vaccination).

As it so happens, the region of the brain that controls respiration is very close to the part of the brain that controls outward eye tracking movements...

•To maximize profits, the pharmaceutical industry will often identify vulnerable groups who lack the ability to advocate for themselves and refuse pharmaceutical products.

•When the DPT vaccine was first developed over a century ago, it was tested at Irish orphanages. Recently mass graves of those early test subjects were discovered.

•Since the DPT vaccine hit the market, physicians around the world have observed waves of infant deaths following its use, which were often sudden and inexplicable (along with many other severe side effects).

•Numerous data sources correlate increasing childhood vaccination rates with increasing infant deaths. Those deaths played a key role in creating the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. That forgotten data compromises the majority of this article.

•When the COVID lockdowns happened, vaccine safety activists predicted the lockdowns would lead to an unprecedented drop in infant deaths since children were skipping their vaccines. This ended up being exactly what happened, and it was reconfirmed by infant deaths dropping in Florida after the pandemic prompted many parents to begin not vaccinating their children.

HISTORY REPEATS: The Blueprint of Medical Tyranny from Spanish Flu to COVID-19

How Government-Sponsored "Epidemics" Continue to Serve Pharmaceutical Profits Over Public Health ...

The author provides compelling first-hand testimony about the 1918 Spanish Influenza epidemic, which she survived. According to McBean, the devastating pandemic that killed 20 million people worldwide was actually caused by the widespread administration of multiple vaccines to soldiers and civilians after World War I. She recounts how her unvaccinated family remained healthy while vaccinated individuals succumbed to the disease in massive numbers.

McBean meticulously documents the rise in typhoid cases following mandatory military vaccination, contrasting this with the previous success of sanitation measures in reducing disease. She presents military hospital records showing how various vaccines led to increased illness and death among soldiers, particularly noting the emergence of a more severe "paratyphoid" in those who received the typhoid vaccine.

The book reveals several court cases demonstrating how medical authorities manufactured epidemics for profit. In Kansas City (1921) and Pittsburgh (1924), doctors were found to have deliberately created false epidemics to sell vaccines, resulting in massive profits and public expense. These cases were exposed through the efforts of citizen health groups who took legal action against the perpetrators. ...

The parallels between the documented historical events McBean presents and recent COVID-19 policies are indeed striking and systematic, not controversial at all when examined objectively:

Government protection of pharmaceutical companies from liability;

Falsification and manipulation of death certificates and statistics;

Use of media to create fear and suppress opposing views;

Financial incentives to medical establishments for compliance;

Rushed vaccines without proper safety testing;

Suppression of early treatment options;

Demonization of those questioning the official narrative.

If you are reading this, you are probably aware of the fierce debate surrounding vaccination and looking for information that will allow you to make the best decisions for yourself and your loved ones. Whether you are a parent or a parent to be, sorting through the many arguments on vaccines can be daunting. Still, you need an answer, a definitive one, to the crucial question: Who has it right in the great vaccine debate – the critics, who claim that vaccines often cause serious harm, or the medical establishment, which tells us that vaccines are safe and effective and the science is settled?

Rest assured, you have come to the right place. Turtles All the Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth will resolve the vaccine question for you, once and for all. By the time you finish reading, not only will you see the answer clearly for yourself, you will also have the scientific references and specific quotes at your disposal that prove it – more than 1,200 of them – all from mainstream scientific papers and textbooks, the official publications of relevant government agencies, or manufacturers’ documents.

The book consolidates a great deal of information (accompanied by detailed analysis) that is scattered in hundreds of medical articles, books, and websites. All discussion is presented in clear and easy-to-understand language, so no medical education is required. It presents several original concepts in addition to laying a robust scientific foundation for the more established ones.

Some of the fundamental vaccine safety issues covered in the book are:
How is safety demonstrated before a new vaccine is licensed? What technique do vaccine manufacturers use in clinical trials to make vaccines appear safer than they actually are?
What “last ditch” technique is employed when the above one cannot be, and what are its grave (and damning) ethical implications?
What is the scientific foundation of the safety of vaccination, and what practical tools does this body of science provide physicians to anticipate, diagnose, and treat vaccine injury?
What fundamental flaws are built into vaccine adverse events reporting systems, and how are these systems used (or misused) by health authorities to support their safety claims?
What kinds of post-marketing vaccine studies are conducted, and how can they be manipulated by researchers to produce “favorable” outcomes?
Why would researchers want to skew vaccine research, and how could skewed results be promulgated by the scientific community?
Why would medical journals publish faulty vaccine science? What is the role of the famed “peer review” in this process?
What are “the studies that will never be done” by the medical establishment and how long it has resisted doing them? (Hint: more than 100 years!)
What key CDC-recommended childhood vaccination guidelines were arbitrarily set, without an adequate scientific basis?

In addition, three cornerstones of vaccination lore are covered in depth:
What is herd immunity, and how does it apply (or not) to the vaccines on the childhood schedule?
What role did vaccines actually play in the historical decline of infectious disease?
Was the paralysis associated with polio actually caused by the poliovirus? Is there a better explanation for the great paralysis epidemics of the 20th century? What are the “19 polio mysteries”?

The book is intended for parents overwhelmed by conflicting messaging on this important topic, but it is also an excellent reference for medical researchers and professionals who seek a better understanding of vaccine safety science. Whether you are new to the vaccine debate or a “veteran” seeking a deeper grasp of the science, this book is a must-read. It also serves as an excellent primer on vaccination to share with friends and relatives who may benefit from a deep dive into the subject.