patrick.net

A biologist's revolt after being deceived
一位生物学家被骗后的反抗

Why did I write this article?
In May of 2021, I took the second dose of the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine. At the time, I was led to believe that everybody knows the vaccines are safe and effective. I kept hearing that anybody who believed in science should want to get vaccinated.
I used to be a biologist; of course I believed in science. So I took the vaccine.
If I had known what I know now, I would not have taken it.
At the time, I had no idea of the level of censorship that hides Covid vaccine injuries from the public. At the time, I thought we could trust our health institutions, more or less.
But not all vaccines are the same, and not all vaccines are equally safe. And criticizing the Covid vaccines, does not make one “anti-vax.”
When it comes to the Covid vaccines, there is overwhelming evidence that they lead to much higher rates of injury and death, than what our health institutions, like the CDC, acknowledge and report to the public. 我为什么写这篇文章？
2021 年 5 月，我接种了第二剂 Moderna Covid-19 疫苗。 当时，我被引导相信每个人都知道疫苗是安全有效的。 我一直听说任何相信科学的人都应该接种疫苗。
我曾经是一名生物学家； 我当然相信科学。 所以我接种了疫苗。
如果我知道我现在所知道的，我就不会接受它。
当时，我不知道向公众隐瞒新冠疫苗伤害的审查程度。 当时，我认为我们或多或少可以信任我们的卫生机构。
但并非所有疫苗都是相同的，也并非所有疫苗都同样安全。 批评新冠疫苗并不意味着一个人“反疫苗”。
当谈到新冠疫苗时，有压倒性的证据表明，它们导致的伤害和死亡率比疾病预防控制中心等我们的卫生机构承认并向公众报告的要高得多。…

https://open.substack.com/pub/joomi/p/i-was-deceived-about-covid-vaccine

I’m saddened that we are super saturated right now in the attitude of “Everybody knows.”
That has shut down intellectual curiosity. And led to self censorship.
So let me start with a few “Everybody knows” examples that I’m not sure we should be so certain about.
Everybody knows that this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated. But if hospitalizations and deaths were almost exclusively occurring in the unvaccinated, why would booster shots be necessary?
Or why would the statistics be so different in the UK? Where most COVID hospitalizations and deaths are among the fully vaccinated…? 我感到难过的是，我们现在已经过度饱和了“每个人都知道”的态度。
这已经关闭了求知欲。 并导致自我审查。
因此，让我从一些“每个人都知道”的例子开始，我不确定我们是否应该如此确定。
每个人都知道这是一场未接种疫苗的流行病。 但如果住院和死亡几乎全部发生在未接种疫苗的人身上，为什么还需要加强注射呢？
或者为什么英国的统计数据会如此不同？ 大多数新冠肺炎住院和死亡病例都发生在完全接种疫苗的人中……？
那里有一个脱节。 有一些事情值得好奇。 有一些东西没有加起来。
There’s a disconnect there. There’s something to be curious about. There’s something not adding up.

Then there’s this. Everybody knows that Covid vaccines save lives. In fact, we‘ve known this from early 2021. The clinical trials proved that to be the case, as you can see here in the quote of a Feb article in the Journal of the American Medical Association. But is it true?

然后就是这个。 每个人都知道新冠疫苗可以拯救生命。 事实上，我们从 2021 年初就知道了这一点。临床试验证明情况确实如此，正如您在美国医学会杂志 2 月份的一篇文章中所引用的那样。 但这是真的吗？

When that statement by prominent public health official was penned, there had been just one death- one death, across the 70,000 Pfizer and Moderna trial participants.
Today we have more data, and you can see that there were similar number of deaths in the vaccine and placebo groups.
The trials did not show a reduction in death, even for Covid deaths, as opposed to other causes… My point is not that I know what the vaccine can and cannot do.
My point is that those who claim the trials showed the vaccines were highly effective in saving lives were wrong.
The trials did not demonstrate this. 当著名公共卫生官员撰写这份声明时，70,000 名辉瑞和 Moderna 试验参与者中只有 1 人死亡。
今天我们有更多数据，您可以看到疫苗组和安慰剂组的死亡人数相似。
与其他原因相比，这些试验并没有显示死亡人数减少，即使是新冠死亡人数……我的观点并不是说我知道疫苗能做什么、不能做什么。
我的观点是，那些声称试验表明疫苗在拯救生命方面非常有效的人是错误的。
试验并没有证明这一点。

By the way, we now have updated numbers from the Pfizer trial showing even more deaths in the vaccinated group. I’ll discuss that in section 4.
Back to Peter Doshi: 顺便说一句，我们现在更新了辉瑞试验的数据，显示接种疫苗组的死亡人数更多。 我将在第 4 节中讨论这一点。
回到彼得·多西：

…