patrick.net

Have about 30 minutes left, but really good overview of chemtrails, HAARP, and the grim reality of the health crisis we face. If you know anyone who gives that BS view about condensation at low altitudes, have them watch starting at 5 minutes.

https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/dane-wigington-interview-2-27-24/

NuttBoxer says

Have about 30 minutes left, but really good overview of chemtrails, HAARP, and the grim reality of the health crisis we face. If you know anyone who gives that BS view about condensation at low altitudes, have them watch starting at 5 minutes.

https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/dane-wigington-interview-2-27-24/

I saw that interview. Wigington is a nut and doesn't know what he's talking about. As I recall, he said there would be serious environmental catastrophe world wide in the coming year. Watch it not happen, again.

We are NOT destroying the world. We can't, the world is a lot more resilient than we're led to believe. Pripyat, Chernobyl, is now a refuge for Przewalski's horse, a horse that is untrainable and only wild and nearing extinction. It thrives in Pripyat. Heavy nuclear fallout has a property, it's heavy. It sinks.

Plastics aren't poisoning us all. Our lower birthrate is because people purposely have less children, and delay having children. It's a consequence of modernity.

His assessment is fucking grim for sure. I think he's right in that we are becoming less intelligent, and personally, I notice a lack of energy that seems more than just age related. Never under-estimate what the toxic burden does to your system. Cancer, birth defects, infant mortality, autism have all increased dramatically, and what he said about aluminum is 100% accurate. See the documentary I've linked to in other posts.

But as I've said many times here, I don't believe there are any incurable diseases. The body can withstand a remarkable amount of abuse and continue to function. There is a point of no return and failure, but it takes a LOT to get there. Wigington's outlook just increases my amazement of God's creation. The resilience of us and nature to keep going despite the odds. I hope this isn't the end, but if it is, we've earned it with our indifference and irresponsible behavior, and I accept those consequences. My only regret is that I didn't wake up sooner. That I didn't do more to serve my God, and love my family, and help those in need.

We're in space wars for sure. If South Americans are painting their roofs blue, why are we flouride brains continuing to deny the obvious.

Ceffer says

We're in space wars for sure. If South Americans are painting their roofs blue, why are we flouride brains continuing to deny the obvious.

Are they?

A blue laser wouldn't work very well, and that's all blue paint would reflect. The color blue is hard to make with a laser which is why it was the last LED color to be created.

Finished the Wigington interview. About the last 15 minutes the guy kind of stops answering questions and just trails off into repeating the same doom-and-gloom scenario. But overall very good. Something he said in the second half that I hadn't considered. What happens to all the nuclear plants in a collapse...

Fortunately my bug-out location is far enough away it would only see Nuclear fallout that is carried by the wind. Still not great, but a lot better than being close enough for ground zero.

Lt. Col. Thomas Bearden (1988) D.E.W. on dutchsinse. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gv2IHQ1Xl9s

Also, daniel geoengineering PDF...............Sumatra 9+ E.Q. and Fukushima HAARP targeting? https://projectavalon.net/Geoengineering_Daniel.pdf

Yeah, right....https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/03/18/1089879/harvard-halts-its-long-planned-atmospheric-geoengineering-experiment/
Where did it go? Western KY?

Huh, this is suspicious:



https://archive.org/details/ChemtrailsManualChemistry131ManualUSAFAcademyFall1990_201810/page/n51/mode/2up

https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/catalog/4041689

Update: I don't see anything about chemtrails in the text of the book.

Patrick says

Update: I don't see anything about chemtrails in the text of the book.

It's just a Chem 101 textbook from the USAF Academy. I saw some basic questions about Ammonia.

Patrick says

I don't see anything about chemtrails in the text of the book.

USAFA is my alma mater. In this case, "Chemtrails" is a play on the word "Contrails," which was book containing stuff that the freshman had to memorize.

Contrails are easy to distinguish from chemtrails because they dissolve behind the craft. The chemtrails persist across the sky and spread out to generate the crappy dun skies.

Some chemtrails are strategic because the metal oxides can be charged to obstruct the electronics of incoming missiles or aircraft or satellites.

However, it seems any creepy creep can hire the chemtrail planes to spread whatever they want including targeted toxxines. The pilots more often than not don't even know what is in the tanks, don't care, don't want to know, and just spray to pick up their paychecks.

@Ceffer

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/no-no-nato-saturday-november-30-2024

A little-covered Florida story revealed the next state to begin pushing back in chemtrail’s federalism war of the states versus the feds. On Thursday, Creative Loafing-Tampa ran an article about Florida’s upcoming legislative session under the headline, “Chemtrails, condo loopholes, and more: Florida lawmakers are already filing bills for the 2025 legislative session.”

The best news was that photogenic Florida Senator Ileana Garcia (R-36) introduced SB 56, an anti-chemtrail bill. If passed, it would prohibit “injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or apparatus into the atmosphere” that “affect the temperature, the weather, or the intensity of sunlight” in the Sunshine State.

So far, so good. But later down the story, it mentioned how earlier this year, Tennessee passed a similar geoengineering ban. But then Tennessee’s administrative agencies said the state’s new law was unenforceable, since the federal government has jurisdiction over chemtrails under the 1963 Clean Air Act,, which now seems pretty badly named. Section 233 provides:

“No State or political subdivision thereof may adopt or attempt to enforce any standard respecting emissions of any air pollutant from any aircraft or engine thereof unless such standard is identical to a standard applicable to such aircraft under this part.”

— Section § 233 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. § 7573.

The so-called Clean Air Act provides a comprehensive definition of “air pollutant,” which includes all the usual suspects believed to be involved in geoengineering, which leaves enforcement —or non-enforcement— potentially just to the FAA.

It’s a bizarre turnaround for a ‘clean air’ statute. The law was probably initially passed to provide a uniform standard for what, by definition, is interstate travel, and perhaps to stop California environmentalists from restricting airplane exhaust only to rainbow-colored mango sorbet.

But in our bonkers timeline, under color of the very same “clean air” environmental laws, enthusiastic liberal “environmentalists” are secretly poisoning the air with aluminum nanoparticles in their quixotic efforts to blot out the sun. Not only are they killing us with aluminum poisoning, they are sadly locking in three generations of seasonal affective disorder. ...

This story is for all you chemtrails conspiracy theorists, the gullible, knuckle-dragging, anti-scientific nitwits who spend far too much time online and believe that lizard people run the Vatican and stuff. So, you might also like to know the federal government is now officially creating “secret” military bases to scan for that thing that doesn’t exist that you dopes believe in. From Thursday’s astonishing limited hangout in the New York Times, grandly presented in a fully-animated, long-form, multimedia, magazine-style story:

BUYING TIME
The U.S. Is Building an Early Warning
System to Detect Geoengineering

Get it? We should be thanking them. You can’t make this stuff up. Behold the remarkable first two paragraphs:

In a guarded compound at the foot of the Rockies, government
scientists are working on a new kind of global alarm system: One
that can detect if another country, or maybe just an adventurous
billionaire, tries to dim the sun.
Every few weeks, researchers in Boulder, Colo., release a balloon
that rises 17 miles into the sky. Similar balloons are launched with
less frequency from sites in Alaska, Hawaii and New Zealand;
Reunion Island, near the coast of Africa; and even Antarctica. They
make up the building blocks of a system that would alert American
scientists to geoengineering.

Haha, goofy ‘adventurous billionaires!’ What will those silly rascals think of next?

At this point, you might be thinking that some people owe some other people an apology, for calling them dumb MAGA hicks for posting chemtrail memes. But nope, because leftism means never having to say you’re sorry. When the narrative changes, the leftist brain resets itself, loads its new instructions, learns its new vocabulary, and moves on. We’ve always known about geoengineering aerosol plumes, dummies; you guys were babbling about chemtrails, which are totally different and don’t exist. Duh.

But I digress. The special scientists working in the guarded Colorado military base are floating balloons that measure air quality, designed to detect foreign particles or aerosols in the air. Not chemtrails. Consider how the article carefully described the unwanted particles:

The early warning system for geoengineering is an effort
splintered across federal agencies and laboratories. NOAA has the
device to measure aerosol concentration and raise a red flag at any
anomalies. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
has the high-altitude aircraft that can carry sophisticated testing
equipment to the location of an aerosol plume. Scientists at Sandia
National Laboratories in New Mexico, working for the Energy
Department, have a tool that can estimate when and where a burst
of aerosol was emitted.

According to the dictionary, a “plume” is something “spread out in a shape resembling a feather.” If you can explain to me the difference between calling them a “trail of chemicals” (chemtrails) versus a “plume of aerosols,” I’ll give you a free ticket to North Korea, where your linguistic skills will come in handy.

Give me a break.

Don’t worry, the article mentioned you crazy chemtrail people. Briefly. In a single sentence. Not to give you any credit. It said, “As of now, scientists believe that solar geoengineering has only been attempted at a very small scale, despite the claims of conspiracy theorists.”

In other words, We don’t know how much geoengineering is happening—or even whether it is happening at any significant scale—but we DO know YOU DUMMIES are wrong about how much you think is happening.

Let’s employ some more critical news reading skills. Consider how that dismissive sentence was constructed. It said that scientists believe that solar geoengineering has only been attempted at a very small scale. They BELIEVE — in other words, they have no evidence. It’s an arrogant guess: their sneering beliefs are inherently better than conspiracy theorists’ beliefs because scientists have credentials.

The article is rubbish and doesn’t even make any sense. It starts out claiming the government has suddenly started trying to find a baseline of how much geoengineering is happening, but then claims without evidence the phenomonen it just started studying is definitely only happening at a small scale.

So, it’s not that you conspiracy theorists were right; you were still wrong, because you overestimated the problem that until ten seconds ago the government denied was even happening at all.

So once again, we find ourselves spinning along the classic wheel of government narrative management:

Stage One—Marginalization (Laughing Denial: “Take Off Your Tinfoil Hat; it isn’t happening, dummy.”)

Stage Two—Minimization (Stingy Concession: “Okay, Maybe It Is Happening, but only a little and just sometimes.”)

Stage Three—Normalization (Arrogant Dismissal: “Fine, It’s Happening a Lot, all the time, but it’s still not as bad as you claimed.”)

Stage Four—Retconning (Gaslighting: “What Are You So Upset About? We always knew it was inevitable, and you should be thanking us for telling you about it.”)

But why this limited hangout, and why now? Is it to normalize geoengineering, so they can start doing it in the open? Are they worried an incoming Trump Administration could blow the lid off, or even deploy the same techniques against them? Could one of our enemies be getting better at doing it than us? Who knows. Something has changed, and now liberals have a new permission structure allowing them to talk about chemtrails, so long as they use three words instead of one and call them “plumes of aerosols.”