patrick.net

William Bay’s outstanding win against Ahpra and the Medical Board of Australia is a devastating loss for Ahpra and the Medical Board.

The rogue collaboration between these two organisations must be critically investigated from the ground up.




Tellingly, former CEO of Ahpra, Martin Fletcher, announced his departure in August 2024, perhaps he saw the writing on the wall... His term has ended in December 2024.

Anne Tonkin, now former Chair of the Medical Board of Australia, also recently ‘stepped down’.

These rats may have departed the sinking ship, but they must still be held to account.

Fletcher and Tonkin have facilitated a ginormous disaster in the medical profession, with practitioners who question taxpayer-funded vaccination policy and practice being threatened with regulatory action, thereby effectively imposing a gag order upon the entire profession.

The great shame for the medical 'profession' is that they, in the main, capitulated to this gag order...

This has all come to a head with the Covid debacle, when the medical profession was press-ganged to support the then Morrison Government's COVID-19 vaccine rollout, no questions allowed.

See for example my email to Martin Fletcher and Anne Tonkin sent in July 2023:

Reckless disregard for voluntary informed consent - the AHPRA Position
Statement 9 March 2021
Elizabeth Hart
Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 4:14 PM
To: martin.fletcher@ahpra.gov.au
Cc: National Intake and Assessment Team , Jamie.Pearce@ahpra.gov.au ,
Amanda.Watson@ahpra.gov.au
For the attention of:
- Martin Fletcher, CEO, Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA)
- Anne Tonkin, Chair, Medical Board of Australia
Please forward this email to all Members of the 15 National Boards who approved the AHPRA Position
Statement 9 March 2021
(Please see the list of current Members at the bottom of this email.)
Copied to: Matthew Hardy, AHPRA National Director Notifications (Re Notification Ref. No. 00531213 re Chief
Medical Officer Paul Kelly)
Dear Martin Fletcher, Anne Tonkin and Members of the 15 National Boards
The AHPRA Position Statement 9 March 2021 is effectively a mandate for health practitioners to comply with
the then Morrison Government's plan for a compulsory Covid-19 vaccination policy, for Covid vaccination to
be "as mandatory as you can possibly make it", as announced by Scott Morrison in August 2020.
On what authority do AHPRA and the Members of the 15 National Boards dictate to health practitioners or
Covid-19 vaccination policy, impacting on health decisions for millions of people, including children?
Have Members of the National Boards breached codes of conduct by demanding health practitioners support
the Morrison Government's Covid-19 vaccination policy, a mass population vaccination rollout which has
violated the legal and ethical obligation for voluntary informed consent for vaccination?

William Bay’s extraordinary win against Ahpra and the Medical Board makes for very interesting times indeed on the voluntary informed consent for vaccination front, and practitioners' legal, ethical and moral obligation to uphold this vital principle.

This remarkable development, which has come in from left field, opens up a whole can of worms - for Ahpra and the Medical Board, for the practitioners, and for other institutions which have collaborated with the destruction of voluntary informed consent for vaccination.

It's going to be interesting to see how practitioners handle consultations involving vaccination in future... Including all those public calls for mass vaccination, and advertisements for vaccine products in doctors' clinics and pharmacies, and TV commercials urging people to ‘see their doctor’ about disease threats, etc.

Practitioners have been recruited as the frontline sales force for the vaccine industry, and they've been indoctrinated by their regulator Ahpra and others to not question vaccine products.

They're also being 'educated' on these products by a vaccine-industry funded organisation - the Immunisation Coalition.

You could not make this up...

In regard to the COVID-19 vaccine products, the newly reinstated doctor William Bay makes his position clear in his response to Cafe Locked Out’s Michael Gray Griffiths:

I think the vaccines are shit, mate. They're absolute shit.
They're killers. They destroy people's DNA.

And I'm telling you this now, Australia and the world, as a registered doctor.

So this is coming from a registered Australian medical professional.

The mRNA vaccines are poisonous. They are bad for you. They are not good for you. They are harming your children. They are harming you.

Everything you've heard has been there to deceive you.

And I have been vindicated in court today, to let you know, the people of Australia, that you have been lied to by the medical regulator. The medical regulator, Ahpra, has lied to you.

And Justice Bradley in the Supreme Court of Queensland today has declared me 100% correct.

Tell us what you really think William!

Watch William Bay’s celebratory chat with Michael Gray Griffith.

A full transcript of their conversation is posted below.

It’s a refreshingly candid conversation with a doctor that must be spread far and wide, and discussed in the court of public opinion.

Congressional Committee Fails to Recommend Special Prosecutors
Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Falls Short of Calling for Justice

On December 2, 2024, the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic concluded its two-year investigation into the COVID-19 pandemic and released a final report titled “After Action Review of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Lessons Learned and a Path Forward.” The 520 page document summarized numerous gross failures and evidence of malfeasance among US agency officials, however, there was no call for special prosecutors.

I appeared on Blaze News Tonight hosted by Jill Savage and Matthew Peterson pointing out there is more than enough evidence to call for three special prosecutors naming targets, subjects, and witnesses:

Crimes committed in the creation of SARS-CoV-2 by the US-Chinese collaboration and the coverup of the Wuhan lab proximal origin

Crimes committed in the suppression of early therapeutics (nasal sprays, hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, monoclonal antibodies)

Crimes committed in the mass indiscriminate COVID-19 vaccine campaign

In most circumstances government and private state actors could be found to have committed fraud and or mass negligent homicide. I found it interesting that now five years into the pandemic, this was my first appearance on Blaze News Tonight. To my knowledge, Glenn Beck, the Blaze flagship host, has never dedicated a show with a physician on COVID-19 vaccine injuries, disabilities, and death.

A new study by Chaufan et al, titled COVID-19 Vaccination Decisions and Impacts of Vaccine Mandates: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Workers in British Columbia, Canada, has just been uploaded to the MedRxiv preprint server. They found that COVID-19 injection mandates took a massive toll on the well-being of healthcare workers:

Goal: To document the experience and views on mandated vaccination of healthcare workers in British Columbia.

Methods: Between May and July of 2024, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of healthcare workers in British Columbia. We recruited participants through a snowball sampling approach, including professional contacts, social media, and word-of-mouth.

Results: Close to half of respondents, with 16 or more years of professional experience, were unvaccinated, and most had been terminated due to non-compliance with mandates. As well, and regardless of vaccination status, most respondents reported safety concerns with vaccination and felt unfree to make their own vaccination choices, yet did not request exemptions due to high rejection rates by employers. Most of them also reported experiencing anxiety or depression, with about one fourth considering suicide, as a result of mandates. Nevertheless, most unvaccinated workers reported satisfaction with their choices, although they also reported significant, negative impacts of the policy on their finances, their mental health, their social and personal relationships, and to a lesser degree, their physical health. In contrast, within the minority of vaccinated respondents, most reported being dissatisfied with their vaccination decisions, as well as having experienced mild to serious post vaccine adverse events, with over half within this group reporting having been coerced into taking further doses, under threat of termination, despite these events. Further, a large minority of all respondents reported having witnessed underreporting or dismissal by hospital management of adverse events post vaccination among patients, worse treatment of unvaccinated patients, and concerning changes in practice protocols. Nearly half also reported their intention to leave the healthcare industry.

Discussion: Our findings indicate that in British Columbia, mandated vaccination in the healthcare sector had an overall negative impact on the well-being of the labour force, on the sustainability of the health system, on patient care, and on ethical healthcare practice. Findings resemble those of a similar study in the province of Ontario, with perhaps the most salient difference being that in British Columbia the policy was implemented at the provincial, rather than the healthcare establishment, level, leaving no room for individual establishments to opt out.

This is a massive and unexpected development.

Bill Gates among several other people, including Albert Bourla from Pfizer, are being sued in the Netherlands by seven people claiming to have been injured by the covid injections.

The plaintiffs say that Bill Gates ”mislead” people into taking the covid injections despite knowing that they ”were not safe and effective”.

Here is the text from the court judgment.

”As the court understands, [redacted] et al. argue that Hofstra et al., and therefore Gates, are part of a worldwide group of individuals, legal entities and other entities that, in the context of the implementation of a project called Covid 19: The Great Reset, have misled people into taking Covid-19 injections, while they knew or should have known that these injections were not safe and effective.”

All of the facts that might rise to the “crimes-against-humanity” level seem to share one characteristic: These claims cannot be investigated by “Science” or “Journalism.”

The risk seems to be that if A, B, C or Z is/was investigated, nefarious truths might be “confirmed.”

And if that happened, many leaders of numerous agencies and organizations - who’d previously claimed something was definitely the truth - might be exposed as brazen liars.

If this happened, a Great Purge of such leaders might take place.

Conversely, if this doesn’t happen - the same leaders will keep their positions of power, wealth and influence.

Some people call this the “Status Quo.”

That is, today’s Status Quo seems to consist of a multi-faceted, coordinated effort to conceal the truth, a status that is achieved by not investigating anything that would prove our leaders are actually extremely-talented serial liars.

💉 Second, on Tuesday the UK Daily Mail reported a great story headlined, “Australian Doctor who was banned from practising after warning against Covid vaccines gets his licence back.”




Self-represented (!) Queensland Doctor William Bay took on his governing medical board’s legal team in a multi-year battle that just ended. On Monday, the province’s Supreme Court reinstated Dr. Bay’s license, canceled all current investigations, and said the allegations against the doctor were “entirely unfounded.”

Dr. Bay, whose license to practice was suspended over his public statements about the risks of the covid vaccine, was ecstatic. “I was able to get through this loss of career, loss of income, marriage breakdown, the whole nine yards of intimidation from the bullies of AHPRA,” the doctor explained, “because I have strong faith in God.”

Thank the Lord. It’s happening slowly. But it is slowly happening, all around the world. The madness of covid is slowly receding and Sanity is re-taking her throne. Stand by for the “retributive justice” phase.

Following the call for the worldwide withdrawal of the Covid “vaccines” due to safety concerns (more reports of linked deaths and serious injury and ongoing cardiac, neurological, immunological and oncogenic pathology than any drug in history)….. our own CSL has doubled down.

It is now recognised that “approved” doses of mRNA “vaccines” produced serious and sometimes fatal effects within days after injection. So, a solution was needed. This solution goes by the name “self-amplifying messenger RNA or sa-mRNA which represents the next generation of mRNA vaccines (also known as replicon RNA). ...

How wonderful…..you can now get a shot that keeps producing a toxic antigen in your body, such as Spike Protein, continuously using synthetic self-replicating genetic technology.

So, after 4 years more and more people simply cannot understand how the Covid vaccines were ever approved in the first place. The toxic Spike Protein was never properly investigated for intrinsic toxicity. These injections were never researched and developed in the normal way and they did not need to pass the usual safety testing which would have been considered prudent for any novel and experimental therapeutic, especially a gene-based therapeutic, intended for worldwide use including healthy individuals, pregnant women, children and infants. Why?

Answer: Because they were not considered to be pharmaceuticals. They were legally defined as “Countermeasures”. Drug regulators pretended to apply the usual quality, safety and efficacy standards…..but we know they did not. They did not because they did not need to do so. It was all theatre.

They are transitioning to full mRNA vaccines, all vaccines will be replaced with this ‘new and improved’ deadly mRNA-LNP disaster and there is not a damn thing you can do about it. Hang them all high, I say!

https://palexander.substack.com/p/nothing-is-over-it-is-not-over-you-aed

They are transitioning to full mRNA vaccines, all vaccines will be replaced with this ‘new and improved’ deadly mRNA-LNP disaster and there is not a damn thing you can do about it. Hang them all high, I say!

1. THE IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF THE COVID-19 mRNA VACCINE PRODUCTS
A growing body of evidence suggests that the widespread rollout of the novel Covid-19 mRNA vaccine products is contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths. ...

64,168
TOTAL SUPPORTERS
1900
MEDICAL DOCTORS
5703
OTHER HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS
2022
SCIENTISTS & ACADEMICS
54543
CONCERNED CITIZENS

GNL There are plenty of scientists who came forward. Many of them got fired or otherwise punished for telling the truth and threatening Pfizer profits and DoD plans.

A lot of them signed this:

https://thehopeaccord.org/

1. THE IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF THE COVID-19 mRNA VACCINE PRODUCTS
A growing body of evidence suggests that the widespread rollout of the novel Covid-19 mRNA vaccine products is contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths. ...

64,168
TOTAL SUPPORTERS
1900
MEDICAL DOCTORS
5703
OTHER HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS
2022
SCIENTISTS & ACADEMICS
54543
CONCERNED CITIZENS

Nearly alone in the world, our government's medical "experts" recommended repeated vaccine shots for healthy young people, age 5 and up, despite their facing near-zero risk from COVID, but serious risks from the vaccine, such as anaphylaxis, myocarditis, pericarditis and/or early death. Ask your doctor if the COVID vaccine is right for you!

Fauci and Francis Collins, then head of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), were so devoted to the scientific method that they conspired to manufacture a "quick and devastating published takedown" of scientists who dissented from their demand that the entire country be shut down -- specifically, the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, which argued against universal shutdowns, advocating instead for focused protection for the elderly, i.e., the only people at risk of death from COVID.

Obviously -- thank you Sweden and Florida -- the dissenters were 100% correct, while Fauci, Collins and the rest of our health bureaucracy were 100% wrong. But at the time, the declaration's principal authors, from Harvard, Stanford and Oxford, were smeared by Collins as "fringe epidemiologists" and blacklisted from social media with the connivance of the federal government.

It isn’t just that these "public health" experts failed spectacularly and never apologized. They're still bragging about ruining millions of lives for no reason. Fauci was paid nearly $5 million for his memoir about his “journey in public service.” Collins delivered his letter of resignation in the form of a whimsical ditty, sung by himself, accompanied by himself on acoustic guitar. The guy is nuttier than Lizzo's personal trainer.

Our constitutionally protected watchdog media lavishly praised these bozos while ginning up nonstop COVID hysteria.

In addition to The New York Times' lachrymose "Those We've Lost" series, producing obituaries for every COVID death (average age of the dead: 120), the paper told an alarmist story about a "26-year-old physician" who died of COVID in a New York City hospital early in the pandemic. His death was somberly reported in the magazine section by Times contributor, Dr. Helen Ouyang.

In response to repeated requests from an alert reader for evidence that such a death had occurred, the editors indignantly claimed that Ouyang had spoken "with the man’s attending physician," and the death was "confirmed by fact-checkers." Executive Editor Dean Baquet snapped at the persistent skeptic: “Enough. ... [W]e have answered and we are done.”

Then it turned out that, of course, the doctor who died of COVID was made up. After The Washington Post's Erik Wemple got on the case, the Times admitted as much in an "Editor's Note." Baquet owned up to an "error."

But even the "Trust the Science!" Times expressed outrage when it discovered the CDC had been hiding data that proved booster shots did absolutely nothing for adults between the ages of 18 and 49. Nothing, that is, other than put them at risk of death and other side effects.

They bankrupted us. They ruined the lives of the bottom 70%. They spent ALL the money. They then proceeded to bankrupt the world. And, realizing the money was all gone, their gamemasters tried to kill us off, first with an engineered virus that failed, then with a vaccine that didn’t. Then they ran up $10 trillion in four years trying to keep the vegetable in power, to get to that point where the Green New Deal paid off in torrents of lovely other people’s money. Which was such a stupid idea that clearly IQ has nothing, absolutely nothing to do with wisdom.

The vaxx is dangerous and ineffective, but even if it were not, it would still be a crime against humanity to force mass injections of anything, much less the new Thalidomide.

Last month, a quiet but blockbuster study was published in the International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine titled, “Pharmaceutical product recall and educated hesitancy towards new drugs and novel vaccines.” The peer-reviewed study savaged the covid shots.




While on its face broadly critical of the entire pharmaceutical safety process, the study clevery situated the covid ‘vaccines’ within the broader history of botched pharmaceutical recalls and horrifying medical scandals. The authors drew parallels to other scandalous cases like Vioxx, Thalidomide, and the miscarriage drug DES. All the drugs were highly profitable, were marketed as “safe and effective,” eventually showed hair-raising long-term side effects, and for too many, the recalls occurred painfully slowly.

But, as the study proceeded, it specifically homed in on the covid jabs and on mRNA, which the authors called “gene technology.” The covid mRNA shot was the only drug discussed in the paper that is, in the researchers’ words, “yet to be recalled.”

Not yet.

Happily, the debate over whether the mRNA shots are actually “vaccines” is alive and well, even though it looked dead and buried. The authors primly dismissed the ‘vaccine’ label as straight-out misinformation:

Use of the term "vaccine" for novel experimental agents that deploy gene codes may convey a false sense of
assurance in the absence of supportive data and thus may mislead. In pharmacological design terms, these
products are "pro-drugs". They must enter cells and undergo translation of genetic code before intended
outcomes unfold (Figure 2), and in this sense they operate as "synthetic viruses" Unintended consequences
are thus possible.

Haha, synthetic viruses. Just as we lawyers have been saying for years.

The study authors challenged the “narrative” (their word) that the covid shots offer any protection against severe disease, dismissing that claim as “a narrative challenged by more recent data” and observing that “Official data from New South Wales during the omicron wave did not concord with the message that these agents prevent serious disease or death, and even suggested the opposite.”

It next turned to mandates and excess death, arguing through hard data. Without coming right out and saying it, the article strongly implied that political jab mandates murdered people who were at zero risk of dying from covid. The study was packed with ammunition for all of us who’ve never given up on proving the vaccines were a historic disaster far beyond the Titanic or the Hindenburg.

Truthfully, the scale of the disaster is better compared to previous horrific drug mistakes, which is exactly what this paper does.

Possibly my favorite part was when they put a logical chokehold on “vaccine hesitancy,” renaming it to “educated hesitancy.” The researchers supported their improved nomenclature by citing surveys showing that reluctance to accept the jabs was highest among PhDs —people most likely to understand the failures of medical literature— and healthcare workers, especially EMTs and paramedics — the people most likely to encounter adverse drug reactions firsthand.

“Educated hesitancy towards these products,” the researchers drily noted in the forgiving passive tense, “has been ridiculed.” We all know by whom. From there, they proceeded not only to show the evidence of great harms caused by the jabs, but they directly grappled with the lack of much serious scholarship about those harms, which they tied right back to the sordid history of other recalled drugs, some of which had encountered the same phenomenon.

This high-quality, peer-reviewed study was extremely well supported, with every claim upheld by multiple footnotes. You can safely send this study to anyone without fear of criticism about its quality.

Maybe most significantly, the study lacked any of the mandatory gatekeeping language we are used to seeing, a sentence sprinkled in here or there about how historic the covid vaccines were, or how many millions were saved, or how the benefits outweigh the risks, and so forth. It was just the opposite, actually.

Reading this study was rhetorically similar to watching a group of pit bulls rip apart an unsuspecting chicken coop. Being so well-supported by well-established data, the researchers’ logic was also difficult to argue with, as was their well-reasoned conclusion. I have included the study’s entire conclusion for your interest:

Conclusion
The fullest context is one in which the pharmaceutical industry has provided many remarkable drugs for the
benefit of humanity. From this backdrop, we have selected a few of the most significant events in
pharmaceutical recall history, in which commercial interest has dominated market strategy, and we have
sought to derive key lessons from these.
A host of mechanisms are used by the pharmaceutical industry to promote and market their products.
These include changes to the definitions or boundaries of disease, introduction of bias long before data
collection begins, concealment of raw data, failure to collect safety data, or decisions not to report negative
or unfavourable results. 33,89,90
Gene codes for foreign protein production throughout the body are particularly novel. Close attention to
pharmacovigilance data is imperative. Failure to withdraw the gene-based COVID-19 vaccines from the
market, despite clear indications of harms, is not without precedent - as has been seen with Merck's Vioxx
(rofecoxib).
Excess mortality figures are high at present in many countries that have deployed the novel and
experimental gene-based COVID-19 vaccines. As open-mindedness, objectivity and curiosity are essential to
good science, we must immediately include new corporate products in our discussions about excess
mortality and its possible causes. Drug recalls have been significant and numerous over recent decades. It
may well be high time for the recall of still more.

In other words, it appears we have entered a glorious new phase, where open criticism of the vaccines has now become permissible. The final step is next, the step from here into the major journals, signaling the complete surrender of those journals’ big pharma masters, which will only happen when continuing denialism is no longer viable.

Once that happens, it will be time for accountability. We are this close, and a skeptical Administration is just about to arrive.

@RepThomasMassie

@CDCgov is quietly deleting misleading information from their website

The following statement was removed from their website between July 16th and July 22nd:

“The mRNA and the spike protein do not last long in the body.”

Current link: https://cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/mrna.html

ht: @RayArmat

Pfizer SV40 DNA has now been found in the blood of Australians. This is a slap with a wet fish for the TGA…. right after their emails demonstrate they know this DNA is a nuclear targeting sequence. They are up the spout as they have assured the public this can not happen and they just rolled out the green and gold for Moderna to build a few vaccine manufacturing plants down under. ...

62 other highly decorated physicians and scientists have signed this letter asking for immediate action.

This DNA was discovered in a Peer Reviewed paper from Ryan et al which was not looking for it. Communication with the lead author of the paper informed us that they even used DNA depletion steps in their protocol so its a bit surprising any DNA sequences were found at all. This leaves us with the only rational conclusion, which is that the DNA loads in Australians blood after vaccination is in fact much higher than can be measured in the Ryan et al study. SV40 Promoter sequences were detected in this study. The Journal has been notified of the discovery. They may not act as the Ryan et al study was never designed to monitor the DNA and therefor this doesn’t constitute an error in need of correction but an incidental finding. Sandeep Chakraborty has written a preprint about this discovery and I have confirmed his findings.

Over the years, I’ve come to accept that the marketing and propaganda apparatus (the public relations industry) has no scrupules and will regularly engage in fairly appalling campaigns to promote a product or a sponsor’s message.

Nonetheless, what I saw them do during COVID-19 was on a completely different level from anything I’d seen in the past. For instance, it was so shameless (e.g., consider the gift cards, lotteries, KFC, donuts [which CNN repeatedly promoted] alcohol, illicit drugs and brothel sessions were given away as incentives to get the vaccine). ...

In theory, if a vaccine “works” you should be protected from individuals who are infected, including those who never vaccinated. Unfortunately, this is not good for vaccine sales as that doesn’t win over people who don’t want to vaccinate, particularly since a non-vaccinated cohort can serve as a control group that shows the dangers of the vaccine (e.g., the industry has done everything it can to stonewall trials of unvaccinated children, but when conducted, those trials consistently show vaccinated children have 3-10 times as many chronic illnesses).

To solve this, three sales pitches were developed:

1) Eliminating an infectious disease is only possible if a sufficient amount of the population is vaccinated (thereby creating herd immunity). This essentially has never worked ...

2) Stating that even if you are vaccinated, it is not safe to be around someone who is unvaccinated (which is absurd as that effectively constitutes an admission the vaccine doesn’t work). ...

Likewise, Biden’s illegal workplace mandates were justified under the rationale that OSHA had a statutory obligation to protect workers from dangers in the workspace. Therefore, it was necessary to force workers to vaccinate so their vaccinated coworkers could have a safe workspace (which is quite remarkable given that OSHA was created to prevent workers from being poisoned and killed by their employers but instead mandated the greatest workplace hazard in history).




... During Bush’s presidency, the rhetoric of “you’re either with us or you’re with the terrorists” was trialed as a way to shut down any dissent on his controversial policies. During Obama’s presidency, it kicked into full gear, particularly after Occupy Wall Street (e.g., BLM was created by the media 5 months after OWS started).

Many of us believe this was done because OWS represented a genuine threat to the America’s business interests, which Obama was keen to defend (e.g., in private meetings with banking CEOs, in contrast to what he told the public, he pledged to protect them from public outrage against them causing a devastating financial crisis—which he then did). As such, Obama used a tried and true tactic from throughout America’s history, pit the lower class against each other so they ignore their exploitation by the upper class.