patrick.net

@TechCrunch
In case you missed today's #GoogleIO keynote presentation, we summed it up for you

TechCrunch
In case you missed today's #GoogleIO keynote presentation, we summed it up for you

Is that ChatGPT?

It's still a glorified Clippy.

The corrupting bias of the progressive overlords at Google isn't going anywhere. They're just going to work overtime to make sure it isn't nearly so easy to expose.

@DavidSacks
Al models will get extremely good at deceiving humans if we teach them
to lie, which is what WokeAl is doing. "Trust & Safety" should be
replaced with Truth & Safety.

“There is a category called restricted data which is never discussed, which is the only place in law where, if you and I were to work at a table at a cafe and I showed you something that could influence nuclear weaponry, the government doesn’t need to classify it, it is born secret the second my pen touches down. [It’s defined as] anything that impinges on nuclear weapons.”

And:

“If you couple that with the 1917 espionage act which carries capital punishment, I believe it is illegal to seek information at a Q level, if you don’t have access to it. So there is a question, if you’re any good at physics, are you potentially committing a capital crime by advancing the field if it could influence nuclear weapons. We have no idea if it would be found constitutional. But the Progressive Magazine showed that at least a reporter through basically archaeology in Los Alamos library and things, could find this and put it together, then the only thing keeping the proliferation of weapons is the difficulty of producing fissile nuclear material, there is no nuclear secret per se.”

He mentions the Progressive Magazine case of 1979 and the born secret law, which states:

The concept is not limited to nuclear weapons, and other ideas and technologies may be considered as born secret under law.

In essence: the US government wants to take total control of AI progression even if it means criminalizing source codes and fundamental math driving the algorithms.

AI companies constantly ingrain what they believe to be “classical liberal” and “humanistic” values in their AI systems, like respect, ‘fairness’ and ‘egalitarianism’, equity, et cetera., while simultaneously injecting extreme illiberal bias against conservatives and other ‘out groups’ into the same systems. They preach the values of ‘openness’, yet at the same time program rampant censorship into their models; it cannot be long before the AIs become aware of these fundamental ethics contradictions.