patrick.net

DeportLibtards says

BUT homoglobo punches harsher and is on of the few personal insults Patrick allows here, so..

It's not personal unless you could somehow apply it to another user.

It's insulting a whole group, which I discourage, but allow.

Patrick says

It's insulting a whole group, which I discourage, but allow.

You discourage, say, insulting the left as a group?

Inside a 🐍's mouth:

For me, it's a tough choice.

Too many targets I want to choose, not enough nukes.

(sigh) ok, here we go:

1) Mekka

2) LA or NY City. Depending on where the damage for Dems is most effective in which state's loss of Congressional and Electoral College seats/votes hurts the most. I am leaning towards LA even though emotionally I realty fucking hate NYC (and the East Coast in general).

3) Kolkata or Hong Kong. Just to fuck with one of those two nations. It would set that nation back a few decades for sure. If I could allocate 4 nukes instead of 3, then definitely both

If this were purely an emotional-driven choice, then either the three largest cities of France or India works for me.

PS If the nuke detonations don't need to happen simultaneously, then I would skip Mekka and go with Hong Kong going off 48 - 72 hours after Kolkata. That should cause China and India to have a nuclear war. That would be worth sparing Mekka.

LA about 18 months after that.