0
0

September 12, 2037


 invite response                
2007 Apr 3, 5:37am   23,192 views  333 comments

by e   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,915445,00.html

Unleashing their pent-up demands and taking advantage of fairly easy mortgage money, millions of people are shopping for houses. In Santa Rosa, Calif., a 90-minute commute north of San Francisco, buyers in June began camping out in sleeping bags on a Thursday night to be first in line Saturday morning when 27 houses in a new subdevelopment went on sale. In the Kendall neighborhood of southwestern Dade County, the last open area reasonably close to Miami, prospective buyers on weekends parade caravan-like in cars and campers through flag-festooned developments.

Sound familiar? Yet another story from 2005? Nope... the publication date of this article was September 12, 1977 - nearly 30 years ago.

Let's look at some other snippets from this time capsule:

Rachelle Resnick, 27, a San Francisco school-bus driver, counts herself fortunate to have bought—with much help from her father—a two-bedroom house that she candidly describes as "a little nothing." It cost $48,500, and she will have to spend $5,000 or so to repair termite damage. But had she waited, it almost surely would have gone higher. The house sold in June 1976 for $28,000, and has since been resold four times by four separate speculators, none of whom lived in it.

Such speculation is common in California and is beginning to appear in other states. Indeed, California is a housing Oz unto itself; its population is still growing faster than that of any other large state except Texas; the recession bit especially deep in California, creating a huge backlog of demand, and strict environmental requirements severely limit the land available for housing. Prices are starting to level off, but the level is in the stratosphere. In platinum-plated Beverly Hills, one cynical real estate broker exclaims: "Oh, I have such a dog on the market right now! Come to my Sunday open house and see what I'm offering for $185,000. I can tell you, for $185,000 you get a piece of nothing." Tom Lorch, a high school principal who is looking for a house in San Francisco, adds, "When we talk about houses, it's money, money, money—not how we're going to live, which seems wrong. And these absurd numbers, $100,000. It's some kind of fantasy world."

Does anyone know what happened to the housing market in California after 1977? Or was the impact of Prop 13 too influential in the resulting statistics?

And finally, the social impact:

Like all inflations, housing inflation has serious social effects. Some wives feel forced to go to work, not because they want to have careers or earn their own spending money, but because buying that dream house nowadays usually requires two incomes. Six out often first-time buyers are families in which both husband and wife hold jobs. Couples who want to have children sometimes face the brutal choice of a house or a child—and, more often than in past years, select the house. In the early postwar period, sociologists and merchants suggested that Americans spent too little on shelter, too much on less basic needs. If so, the market has more than corrected that tendency. In order to buy a house, couples are scrimping drastically on other spending—for cars, food and even furniture; not a few fancy new houses are almost bare inside. Young people have always asked parents for help in scraping up the down payment on a home; mortgage bankers call the payoff from papa a "gift letter." Now the pool of cash required to spend the first night in a new house—frequently $20,000 to $30,000—has made this sacrifice of independence a matter of necessity rather than choice.

So... this was in 9/1977. Now, it's hard enough predicting what 9/2007 will be like - but what do you think September 12, 2037 will be like?

Already, both parents are working, realtors are spinning the Bay Area as a place so great that you don't need to take vacations - what's next? Will child labor make a come back? ("Monta Vista High School and Fireworks Factory #88"?) How much more special can it get here?

(Bonus points for including Peak Oil in your prediction...)

#housing

« First        Comments 18 - 57 of 333       Last »     Search these comments

18   Peter P   2007 Apr 3, 8:06am  

Comrade Peter is a master of the dialectic process (of which I know just bare enough to pass politics at school).

Hegel?

19   Peter P   2007 Apr 3, 8:07am  

Or were you referring to dialectical materialism?

20   Peter P   2007 Apr 3, 8:13am  

Oh. I also believe that only through conflict can resolution arise.

21   DinOR   2007 Apr 3, 8:15am  

"there will be massive out-migration of Californians"

Glen, Jack Lessinger has already written extensively on this topic and introduced the term "Penturbia". Since we no longer require (or desire) much of the infrastucture cities provide we are now free to live where we want to live. He amplifies on the topic at www.predicting2020.com.

I'm told the concept of penturbia is based on the 4 previous mass migrations in this country. If you want "quality of life" in the future? Think college town! Interesting stuff. Oh btw, it won't just be an exodus from CA.

22   Carl in Berkeley   2007 Apr 3, 8:51am  

Meh.
The world ended last year.
We just haven't noticed yet.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Sjf4ELVeX8

23   Paul189   2007 Apr 3, 9:00am  

@ Peter P,

That is so funny. Thanks for the laughs. I think I'll buy a t-shirt to wear to work.

24   e   2007 Apr 3, 9:01am  

From the 2020 site:
In 2006, a large part of the U.S. population stands ready to pull the plug on Squanderville.

Maybe I'm just being cynical here... but what crack is the guy smoking. 2006?

Exurbs are still the rage.

25   e   2007 Apr 3, 9:04am  

The inflation calculator I just tried said:

What cost $20,000 in 1977 would cost $68,425.49 in 2006.

$68k... that would just barely be 10% these days.

Hurray for looser lending!

26   Paul189   2007 Apr 3, 9:04am  

"A generation ago, much of New York’s middle and some of its upper class were departing for the suburbs. Today, many empty nesters are returning, which, together with the city’s strong attraction for young college grads, artists, media workers and other members of the sought after “knowledge economy,” have revitalized life in town."

Yeah I think I'll sell my house in Jersey for 1M and buy one of those 4 bedrooms in Manhattan for 7M.

27   Peter P   2007 Apr 3, 9:07am  

Hurray for looser lending!

Did you intentionally misspell "loser?" :)

28   Paul189   2007 Apr 3, 9:14am  

@ MrBubble Says,

I'm with Jim S. on the China thing. I don't believe china will liquidate US dollar holdings but simply slow or stop the accumulation of new pieces of US Federal Reserve notes. This will be more than enough to through things into chaos!

29   DaBoss   2007 Apr 3, 9:15am  

"“It’s an absolute fact that people want to live here. That keeps housing prices high. If it wasn’t for the demand, prices would drop,” said Richard Calhoun, real estate broker and owner of Creekside Realty in San Jose."

LOL! Oh the humanitity of it!!!!

Hm… Silicon Valley attractions. Let’s see…

" Washington DC has the Smithsonian -
we have the San Jose Museum of Art "

LOL! I been here for a long time .. but frankly we suck when you look at weekend activity! We had better night clubs back in the 80s then over the past 10 years 1995-2007. Few people venture outside SantaCruz boardwalk.. say a drive on Highway 1 towards Pacifica. or cut to the mountains. ....

We do get huge traffic jams in Valley Fair... We do spend and drive to the malls ... but thats pretty much it.

30   Paul189   2007 Apr 3, 9:17am  

@ Peter P,

"For that price you can almost get a cruise condo."

Are these condos in preperation for Waterworld when Al Gore's vision becomes reality?

31   Peter P   2007 Apr 3, 9:17am  

” Washington DC has the Smithsonian -
we have the San Jose Museum of Art ”

Someone said this, I am merely quoting:

The Middle Kingdom has Great Wall of China
We have Great Mall of the Bay Area

32   Peter P   2007 Apr 3, 9:18am  

Are these condos in preperation for Waterworld when Al Gore’s vision becomes reality?

Probably. :)

33   OO   2007 Apr 3, 9:33am  

People in NYC are sending kids to public schools again not because they have confidence in the crappy public school system, but because they cannot afford to send kids to private school, after buying a $2M condo.

I don't know of anyone in my generation who would rather send their kids to public schools, even those situated in the best public school areas. If money is not an issue, most people prefer to send kids to private schools, at least this is the case with California. Have you checked out the credentials of the public school teachers even at the best schools? Anybody in our generation with a tiny bit of aspiration and intelligence would not end up becoming a public school teacher.

Parents struggle to get into good school districts because this is the most economical way for a household with 2 or more kids.

34   OO   2007 Apr 3, 9:36am  

I am more intrigued to read some housing related article dated back to 1981 and 1982 after gold and oil peaked.

It will be interesting to see how many ounces of gold it took in 1980 or 1981 to buy a nice home in, say, Portola Valley.

35   Peter P   2007 Apr 3, 9:36am  

Parents struggle to get into good school districts because this is the most economical way for a household with 2 or more kids.

True. Renting in good school districts requires less struggle though.

36   Bruce   2007 Apr 3, 9:44am  

I think that by 2037 the majority of us will be of Latin extraction, that coastal areas will have problems with high water more frequently than today, that we will continue to drive cars.

People who are only youngters today will believe they possess a perfect understanding of real estate and personal finance thirty years from now, and this will shape their own boom and bust cycles. The busts will take them by surprise. Someone will coin a fresh way of saying 'new paradigm'.

There will not be enough young workers to support GenX retirement.

Survivalists will begin to concentrate in urban areas.

China Disney will celebrate its 20th anniversary, and Woody Allen will awaken from his cryonic slumbers.

38   Peter P   2007 Apr 3, 10:02am  

I think the UK financial bubble will not end pretty.

39   Paul189   2007 Apr 3, 10:14am  

Patrick,

How about a buyers resource for buying REOs. A master list of lender links perhaps.

40   OO   2007 Apr 3, 10:16am  

I am much more skeptical about UK economy than ours. Apart from money, what else do the Brits manufacture these days?

When I am doing stock research, I am still finding comfort in lots of tech stuff that we do in this country (although the mundane manufacturing processes are increasingly outsourced, perhaps justifyingly so). The key is that we crash before we start to outsource the proprietary knowledge-based stuff to China or India, and I am glad that we are on the right path. The earlier the crash, the better for us.

UK? I really can't seem to find anything the Brits can do that the rest of the world cannot, except for being the money laundry center for the Eastern European drug lords. London will end much worse than the Bay Area, at least we have the weather.

41   OO   2007 Apr 3, 10:20am  

For example, when I was down in Oz, an Aussie truck salesman told me that for the 18 wheeler, we are the only source of production in the world, the Japanese and Germans only specialize in smaller trucks. What about China? No they don't have the machine tools for that, and the only source of machine tools for 18 wheelers is again from the US.

42   Peter P   2007 Apr 3, 10:30am  

UK? I really can’t seem to find anything the Brits can do that the rest of the world cannot, except for being the money laundry center for the Eastern European drug lords.

One thing UK does NOT have: worldwide taxation. This feature alone is attractive enough for financial institutes.

The US needs to drastically reform its taxation policies.

43   Paul189   2007 Apr 3, 10:35am  

Patrick,

You could add government links like the following;

http://www.ustreas.gov/auctions/irs/ssca_real_2080.htm

44   OO   2007 Apr 3, 10:37am  

Peter P,

That is not true.

My parents live among many British retirees in Oz, and the #1 reason they departed UK was to evade the death tax. According to them, if they kick the bucket within 7 years of leaving the UK, they will need to pay IHT (inheritance tax) which starts at a very low threshold of ~200K pound. UK has one of the highest death taxes in the world, and that's the main reason why well-off Brits are leaving the country in droves, driving up property prices in Spain and Oz, apart from seeking better weather of course.

One British retiree once told me, there are only two types of people who remain in UK: the immigrant deadbeats (not even the hardworking ones, because the hardworking ones come to the US) chewing on the welfare, and the rich immigrants parking their money accumulated from politically unstable places like Russia. Every year, 200K+ Brits are emigrating (not to be confused with immigrating) to other countries.

45   Paul189   2007 Apr 3, 10:40am  

"UK? I really can’t seem to find anything the Brits can do that the rest of the world cannot, except for being the money laundry center for the Eastern European drug lords."

Funny - at work today we were talking about the thousands of airline puts bought before 9/11 and how that profit just went over to Europe with no trace of where it went.

46   dp337   2007 Apr 3, 10:42am  

"Stocks Surge on Positive Housing Report...The National Association of Realtors' index for pending sales of existing homes rose in February at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 0.7 percent...That says people are getting mortgages, people are buying houses, people have incomes, jobs, all that good stuff," said Kim Caughey, equity research analyst at Fort Pitt Capital Group. "You'd never go out and buy a house if you think you're going to get laid off. Consumers are optimistic about the future, and as we all know, the consumer drives this economy."

Looks like we'll hear calls for "bottom" from the you know who's....

47   Bruce   2007 Apr 3, 10:43am  

Peter P,

Interesting about worldwide taxation. Is the US in a minority on this, or is the practice fairly common?

48   Peter P   2007 Apr 3, 10:44am  

Every year, 200K+ Brits are emigrating (not to be confused with immigrating) to other countries.

With a strong GBP I am not surprised.

My parents live among many British retirees in Oz, and the #1 reason they departed UK was to evade the death tax.

I should have said "worldwide income taxation for residents not domiciled in the UK."

49   Peter P   2007 Apr 3, 10:47am  

Interesting about worldwide taxation. Is the US in a minority on this, or is the practice fairly common?

Many countries tax their residents on a worldwide basis. I think US is one of the few countries that also tax their citizens regardless of residency.

50   Peter P   2007 Apr 3, 10:48am  

apparently the brits are NOT coming to CA. Never met one here, but 1000’s of asians of every type.

I have several friends from the UK.

51   OO   2007 Apr 3, 10:52am  

#1 destination for British seniors: Spain
#1 destination for British younger than 40: Australia

I have had two British colleagues before, there are 2-3 British stores selling Marmite, Maltesers, etc in the Bay Area.

It is relatively harder for Brits to come to CA, because most of them emigrate to enhance their lifestyle. With their home equity, they can buy a big house in a decent Aussie suburb all-cash. If they come to CA, they don't get half as much upward mobility with lifestyle.

52   OO   2007 Apr 3, 10:54am  

US is the ONLY country on earth that taxes its citizens AND permanent citizens on a worldwide basis regardless of their residency. Other countries don't even dare to think about the concept of taxing their PRs when the PRs are out of the country.

Gotta luv Uncle Sam.

53   Bruce   2007 Apr 3, 11:00am  

Peter P,

I'm a little startled, then, having friends who've moved to Nice and other Mediterranean locations. It must have been a headache for them to move assets offshore (Monaco bank) - and from what you say, an annual tax burden as well.

Certainly helps to keep us at home and xenophobic... :neutral:

54   Malcolm   2007 Apr 3, 11:03am  

Now the pool of cash required to spend the first night in a new house—frequently $20,000 to $30,000—has made this sacrifice of independence a matter of necessity rather than choice.

Pretty sad that in current times most buyers can't even come up with a 1977 downpayment. What does that tell you?

55   Peter P   2007 Apr 3, 11:03am  

It must have been a headache for them to move assets offshore (Monaco bank) - and from what you say, an annual tax burden as well.

I believe a competent tax-accountant can work to minimize the liability.

56   Peter P   2007 Apr 3, 11:04am  

What does that tell you?

We are f#$ked.

57   Malcolm   2007 Apr 3, 11:05am  

It is going to be bumpy but the market will survive. I hope policy makers have the will and “heart” to let people fail. Destruction is part of the creation process.

This is a foreign concept to most people Peter.

« First        Comments 18 - 57 of 333       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions