patrick.net

HelloKitty,

They put the 'tool' in Toolbox over there.

This particular bank has, like others, been expecting losses post-housing boom and has stepped up reserves to make up for the problem loans. “Oh, I’ve seen this all before,” said the career banker. “We always have some losses, but it’s contained. The banks are going to be just fine. In fact, I see business picking up by summer.”

This to me, is where it gets interesting... what business will be picking up by the summer? Seems like the calm before the Alt-A storm. I keep getting (ir?)rational urges to short WaMu, even with their 5% dividend yield.

DinOR

I’ve seen a lot of HYIP scams but fail to see how that necessarily fits with what SL is doing? Classic HYIP scams offer outrageous returns that can be paid out “daily” with minimal investment. Supposedly this money (or “e-gold”) is yours. Whenever they’re pressed as to how they can offer such high rates of return the answers are garbled at best. Usually something along the lines of “The Fed (or the wealthy) have been doing this for years. Now you too can….”

SL OTOH makes no such pretense!

Oh, but they do. That's what I detailed. Look at the hundreds of comments I got back from "shills" claiming they were running Second Life "businesses" which were growing at 30% PER MONTH, and they were pulling thousands of $ per month. That's a pretty outrageous return for maybe $20 investment, no? The entry "fees" are very low. The only difference here is that there is a real *game* going on at the same time. There are people who just go there to play and have fun.

But I was specifically talking about the "businesses", which the company and all their cultists have pushed and pushed and pushed. The CEO said "Play Second Life, have fun, and pay your rent at the same time". USA Today said 'Quit your job and earn your living in Second Life'.

But I proved there are only a couple dozen people making net positive profits -- and HUGE net positive profits, while everyone else loses money. And the game makers make millions per month "printing" all the fake money.

HYIPs are increasingly wrapped in some legitimate facade. I have no argument that Second Life as an online game platform isn't interesting and legitimate. But the business model isn't to charge people to play the game. The game is free. The only money anyone makes is from the company printing fake money, and a bunch of "businesses" try to hit the virtual gold mine.

And their claim as to why they can earn something like 12,000% returns? "It's no different than the real world economies. The dollar is worthless, rich people are always at the top, this is how they make money. Come into Second Life and you can be one of those rich people at the top".

And Peter P, that probably answers your question too, lol

On a serious note, I am starting a new company right now in an entirely different area of interest. In fact, anyone local to SF who's very good at RoR and is startup-compatible is welcome to email me.

And Peter P, that probably answers your question too, lol

And I will try to protect you with my remote-influencing virtual light shield*. :)

*not guaranteed to work

this jeff guy and the sdcia remind me of these mark davis quotes:

'the measure of good government has become an ability to encourage its citizens to ruthlessness'

singular sorry

Jon,

Only 350K! It's a steal!

Governments have by and large abandoned their traditional role of taking responsibility for the equitable redistribution of wealth and privilege in a democratic society, and have increasingly left that job up to the markets, a policy which has been complicit with the sort of inequity the politics of division are designed to cover. The outcomes of such strategies deserve to be more highly publicised. When it comes to Australian young people a few statistics are worth mentioning. Australia has one of the largest gaps between rich and poor of all OECD countries, with higher levels of poverty in regional areas. It also has one of the highest rates of child poverty. It has historically high rates of youth unemployment, and one of the world's highest rates of youth suicide, especially in regional areas.

One of the items on most conservative agendas in Western countries in the 1990s has been an attack on the idea that democracy should be radically inclusive, and should reach across the broad spectrum of social difference. Instead, democracy is being re-imagined as an assimilatory mechanism that excludes those not willing to enter a fairly narrow, often backwards-looking, social contract - as opposed to the traditional idea that democracies exist precisely to ensure that minorities don't suffer and marginalised groups have access to the same range of educational, health and welfare resources as the wider polity. The ideas that democracy is always already a level playing field where no adjustments need to be made, that everyone is already the same because they have the same rights and freedoms (and therefore the same privileges), and that no interventionist concessions should be made to disadvantaged groups, are popular in Australia at the moment.

There have been recent concerted and widespread attempts by both politicians and the media to discredit those statutory and semi-government organisations that have anything to do with redistributing social justice. Wedge politics and attacks on minority groups have tended to translate into attacks on legal aid funds, the independence of the judiciary and the work done by bodies such as The Equal Rights and Opportunity Commission, as well as undermining the commitment of governments to International charters, especially human rights charters. This, too, is a function of a conservative, anti-welfarist turn in politics. It's also a function of an increasingly competition- and efficiency- driven society that tends to see individual interest as paramount, to the point where the measure of good government has become an ability to encourage its citizens to ruthlessness.

Sick, wicked culture: the global politics of regional youth - Mark Davis
http://www.renewal.org.au/markdavis/sick.html

Governments have by and large abandoned their traditional role of taking responsibility for the equitable redistribution of wealth and privilege in a democratic society, and have increasingly left that job up to the markets, a policy which has been complicit with the sort of inequity the politics of division are designed to cover.

I think many on this site would argue that that's not government's role at all.

See all the libertarian threads before this. :)

Nice find on the oakland house - i'll add it to burbed!

That said, I still hold this house is worse than that one:

http://www.burbed.com/2007/03/26/affordable-starter-home-or-fallujah-replica-in-the-bay-area-you-decide/#comments

I think many on this site would argue that that’s not government’s role at all.

of course they would. they frequently do. the view in australia, as a fairly recently settled ex-colony in a hostile environment, was that govt should be present to correct deficiencies and lend a hand when times are hard. hence, people traditionally turn to govt for solutions here more so than in the US, for instance. (and think about what a 'governor' does on a steam engine.) however, public opinion and the US national trait is one of individualism and fatalism, for better or worse. (i would argue it is often for the worse, and at best fatalism is just a coping or ego defence mechanism.)

i would hate to think that the american view of the role of govt is limited to making war, spending inordinate amounts of taxpayers' money on armaments, harassing other countries for advantage, and so on. traditionally, americans somehow see politics and their govt as being there to facilitate business.

Governments have by and large abandoned their traditional role of taking responsibility for the equitable redistribution of wealth and privilege in a democratic society, and have increasingly left that job up to the markets, a policy which has been complicit with the sort of inequity the politics of division are designed to cover.

Because someone did tear down that wall?

Oops, it shouldn't have had the #comments thing at the end. Here's a tinyurl:

http://tinyurl.com/2v9cpt

Because someone did tear down that wall?

what's THAT got to do with anything?

That role of the government was proven to be inappropriate.

Peter P Says:
That role of the government was proven to be inappropriate.

if you say so... they're your ghettos, after all...

@SP,

My pleasure.

they’re your ghettos

Fair description of the Bay Area.

[quote]I keep getting (ir?)rational urges to short WaMu, even with their 5% dividend yield. [/quote]

I have a large cash position right now, and I'm not keeping it in banks like WaMu for similar irrational urges.

SP

You just invoked a lot of memories. Man.

See if you can find me in this old archive from the day (when SLIP PPP was a big deal).

http://scout.wisc.edu/Projects/PastProjects/NH/95-02/95-02-16/0023.html

uucp in the house

Stop it, before this gets out of hand and all the youngsters head back to MySpace and YouTube.

Nah, Randy, we're all hanging out at woot.com right now.

It looks as if the housing equity sector in Spain is tanking. Can you spell
G-L-O-B-A-L housing problems?
Hope the link works
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/060c6658-f287-11db-a454-000b5df10621.html

We are presently renting while we try to hunker down from the housing bubble issues. At first I felt guilty watching my 75 year old landlord mow the lawn, however his control freak wife keeps refusing my offers to help with the gardening. One day, he came over with his arm in a sling and all his wife would do was bitch at him as he is trying to mow the lawn with one arm.

I'm keeping up my CPR skills in case he drops dead in front of me.

Has anybody noticed the US market indices spurting new highs almost daily ?
And the US dollar falling in value against most of the world?
Is it that private equity has taken around 5% of stocks to buy off the public market leaving the foreigners' insatiable appetite to fund our folly chasing the crumbs left behind ?
Or is this the time of the year to sell into this nonsense and buy into the "sell in May and go away" theory which worked like a charm last year ?
The 30 dow components are thrashing predicted earnings helping lure more $$ into their stock prices as the rally is picking up more steam. Charts are strong . Momentum is strong . Earnings ditto . Outlooks super . More company buy backs helping EPS . TECH FINANCIALS OIL RETAIL all are on FIRE
China growth is shazam
Russia Kaboom
Germany bo yah
England -sterling over 2
Arabs windfalling at over $60 a barrel every minute of every day going going going up up up where will it stop ?
That late Feb swoon in hindsight was a major buy signal .
OK it is easy doing monday morning quarterbacking.
Isn't anybody bearish ? All bulls ? What happened to that 4 year business cycle ?
Heck I don't know and been bearish for last 2 months and have lost way too much money being the pessimist I am .
Will I be broke before the market turns south ??
Like casey serin ?
Should I start a stock losers' blog to bum money or google adsense ?
Gas going to $4 doesn't hurt consumer spending but increases it ?
I thought I knew my chit but the market is telling me not to fight it and join the party which is very hard for me to do.
If we don't tank in May then I will be even poorer .
Should I invest in real estate to cushion my stock losses ?
he he
HELP !

Quote (while working a college student-programmer-consultant job):

"If you learn Banyan Vines, you'll be set for life. Trust me."

This guy was an Amdahl expert. I was working on a Prolog and SAS project at the time.

appletalk

localtalk in the house!

INT 13 0

danville_woman said:
One day, he came over with his arm in a sling and all his wife would do was bitch at him as he is trying to mow the lawn with one arm.

I’m keeping up my CPR skills in case he drops dead in front of me.

Based on the description you gave of his charming wife, I would guess the poor guy would NOT be too grateful at being revived!

SP

HelloKitty Says:
Now you are OUTED as the pre-internet BBSing geezers that u r , grok them apples!!!!

Huh? This is hardly the first time I have mentioned usenet in nostalgic terms - in fact I (being elitist, after all) think the internet used to be better when most of the folks on it were from .edu and .net domains. Less noise back then, even with the tradeoff that one had to uudecode the files from alt.s.p. :-)

SP

justme Says:
ROT13, anyone?

Ah, yes - many a time on rec.humor. (Whatever happened to Henry Cate III?)

In fact, IIRC, I think the first shell-script I wrote back in school was:
tr 'A-M N-Z a-m n-z' 'N-Z A-M n-z a-m'

SP

I bet the kids today think "Archie, Veronica & Gopher" are just comic book characters. Wait... do they even know what a "comic book" is?

Shit, I feel really old now. Maybe I should start hanging out at MySpace & Woot.

HARM Says:
I bet the kids today think “Archie, Veronica & Gopher” are just comic book characters.

I actually have a 11 year old niece who thinks these are comics for 'old people' at the supermarket. She reads some other (post Ranma) japanese comics that I cannot grok - most of which seem heavy on fantasy and girl-power themes, and very low on original plot.

SP

"US Out of the Middle East AND San Francisco"

http://www.brumm.com/antiwar/jan18/07.html

When you consider that roughly 50% of SF residents are renters (and thereby unAmerican), and combine that with non-US citizens who own property/mortgages there, then the U.S. is sort of out of SF already. Or vice-versa.

In many ways, the charge of "un-American" levied these past several years against anyone who isn't completely behind the war in Iraq, is very similar to attitudes towards those of us who did not take the creative loans, did not participate in the bidding wars, and stubbornly continue to rent. I realize the post is tongue-in-cheek, but I do see a corollary. The sentiment of "if you're not with us, you're against us" is quite evident in the reaction to HARMs posts to the SDCIA Jeff thread.

Hey, if logic, reason and making informed decisions are unAmerican, then I wear the scarlet "R" proudly.

Thanks Peter P for another thought provoking contribution.

If you look through the 'GO-Zone' thread at the SDCIA message board, you can find a post from the FB-du-jour indicating he got most (9, including the 3 FL turkeys) of his properties via an organisation fronted by a Marshall Reddick.

Does this name ring bells with any of you guys/gals? As an Australian I have a vague recollection of seeing the name in relation to some RE Investment Seminars, but nothing past that.

Randy H,

My bad. I had no inkling SL was making those types of claims. A 12,000 % return is realistic though, right? Gotta go, see you "loosers" later!

Jon,

I've been following the "7-11 of financial services" for some time. They get slammed over at www.rrmag.com in the broker forms w/ regularity. Perhaps Amway would be more appropriate?