0
0

Something Doesn't Add Up Here


 invite response                
2007 May 14, 3:25am   20,696 views  207 comments

by SQT15   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

chart
John Burns Real Estate Consulting has put out in their monthly newsletter that housing if falling faster than is being reported.

The housing market has softened much more than is being reported. We have been advising our retainer clients for more than one year about misleading national sales information, both with the Existing Home Sales and New Home Sales data. We are now going public with our concerns because we are concerned that policy makers are relying on national data to conclude that the housing market correction has not been severe.

Here is our support:
Closing Data: We purchase and compile actual home closing data for approximately 181 counties across the country, which captures the counties where about 55% of the U.S. population lives and a significant percentage of all of the counties where the large home builders are active. This data shows that sales have fallen 22% if you compare sales over the last 12 months to the prior 12 months. On a straight year over year comparison, the decline is much more.
Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) Data: The MBA Seasonally Adjusted Purchase Application Index, which is a measure of the number of people filling out loan applications to buy a home, is down 18% from its peak in September 2005.1 With presumably more applications being filled out by borrowers who now have to shop around for a loan, how could sales have fallen by less than 18%?
Builder Data: The nation's two largest homebuilders, D.R. Horton and Lennar, are reporting that orders have declined 27% to 37%, year-over-year. 2 3 D.R. Horton and Lennar have dropped prices significantly in many markets to generate sales, while the resale market has not. How could their sales have fallen more than the resale market, even if new home communities tend to be in fringe areas?
Realogy Corporation Data: Realogy, which is the parent company of Century 21, Coldwell Banker, and ERA, participated in roughly 1.9 million brokerage related transactions in 2006 compared to 2.3 million in 2005, representing a year-over-year decline of 18% nationwide.4
2005-2006 NAR State Data: The National Association of Realtors state data does show sharp year-over-year corrections in major states: 28% drop in Florida, 24% drop in California, and a 28% drop in Arizona. Our data, however, shows the sales have probably dropped by 34%, 27% and 38%, respectively. The national numbers include some large states where sales volumes have not corrected substantially, such as in Texas and Ohio, but we believe these markets are not very healthy for other reasons. Interestingly, our calculations were tracking very closely with NAR data through 2005, as illustrated above. We did investigate NAR methodology and have found absolutely no reason to believe that the NAR is intentionally misleading anyone, as some have suggested.
New Home Data: The Census Bureau calculation of new home data does not calculate sales net of cancellations, and cancellations are running much higher than normal right now, which is why the sales numbers overestimate actual sales.

The preponderance of evidence shows that the housing market in vibrant areas where home building is prevalent has corrected much more than some people believe it has.

In summary, we believe that the Fed should know that the housing market correction has been quite steep and is also not showing signs of bottoming out, as evidenced by all of the above information, as well as significant additional research we have conducted. While the Fed has far more to consider than housing, they should know that the housing market could sure use some lower interest rates to help achieve stability soon.

This is my favorite quote "We did investigate NAR methodology and have found absolutely no reason to believe that the NAR is intentionally misleading anyone, as some have suggested. "

Um, yeah.

Overall I love this article though. I think we'll see much more of these types of reports as time goes on. I really think that people don't realize the magnitude of the boom and bust cycle we're in. Most people I talk to are much more pessimistic about housing than they were just a year ago but there is still this feeling that the market will be on an upswing in the near future. Articles like this make that seem unlikely.

Here's the link to the full article

SQT

#housing

« First        Comments 112 - 151 of 207       Last »     Search these comments

112   EBGuy   2007 May 15, 4:05am  

skibum,
Thanks for the DQ link. I think this was the hightlight for me -- DQ admits the median blows as an indicator of the current market direction (explained many times on the RE blogs, and now enshrined in their press release).

The median price paid for a Southland home was $505,000 last month, the same as the March record. It was up 6.1 percent from $476,000 for April last year. When adjusted for shifts in market mix (i.e. fewer lower-cost homes selling now), year-over-year price changes went negative in January and are roughly one percent below year-ago levels. They are about two percent below the peak in June last year.
WOW!

113   LowlySmartRenter   2007 May 15, 4:11am  

"No, the FB is not math challenged, just short sighted in his greed. "

I agree with your basic premise that many buyers in the last few years were just looking for instant gratification. The difference though between the guy who buys that DVD player on credit today is that DVD players haven't been increasing in price by leaps and bounds, such as RE has.

For some, the issue was not that they couldn't wait for true affordability, but rather they chose the lesser of two evils (pay outrageous price for home today or even more outrageous price for home tomorrow). Or so they thought at the time....remember, for many younger buyers, the BA bubble is all they have ever known. For years, they saw prices increasing by double-digits, and for those who wanted a home, not an investment, they rationalized that now is better than later, when they will be "priced out forever".

I do not however defend any FB who didn't do the basic math to discover how their payments would balloon over the years. There's just no excuse for that.

114   Malcolm   2007 May 15, 4:13am  

DinOR, I had the same cautious denial but I had been following this auction and was even going to attend it. You might remember I actually posted the link when I saw the commercial for it. IMO this was basically a market test for the lenders, that's why I am stunned because the one at a time auctions I had sat in recently were surprisingly strong.

These were 98 homes that were auctioned, last month there were 608 new foreclosures in San Diego. The classic tip of the iceberg. I just know this will hit the local news today or tomorrow, and I am already bracing for the collective heartbreak as everyone who bought in the last 2 years realizes their houses are worth a horrifying fraction of what they paid.

It is fun to be right, and I thought I would be gloating on this day, but the misery that this is going to bring really puts a damper on winning this argument with my circle of friends.

115   DinOR   2007 May 15, 4:14am  

"the huge rush to buy during the frenzy (leaving less demand for today)"

That is as much their problem as anything. With or without mortgage money "drying up" the consumer has budgeted about as much of their take home income (and then some) for housing as is possible. The wheels were bound to come off.

116   Peter P   2007 May 15, 4:14am  

There is nothing wrong with deferred gratification. One just needs to recognize that enjoyment has a time value too. It is all but balance. But what isn't anyway? :)

Indulgence is a good external motivator. Sometimes you just need to spoil yourself so that you will want to get more. (I blame my Taurus Ascendant for this.)

117   Peter P   2007 May 15, 4:17am  

Delayed gratification on the sell side can backfire in bubbles.

Yep. No one can take away what has already been enjoyed. One must allow himself a reasonable lifestyle. Remember, money represents purchasing power. If it is never exercised, it is same as rubbish.

118   Malcolm   2007 May 15, 4:18am  

Yup, I used to caution my friends that there might be warning signs but if I were right I did not expect an orderly decline. Oh, my house is worth 3% less than last year but I can still sell.

Like you point out the wheels do come off as all of the variables seem to hit at once. A year of year decline, high foreclosures, and then the inevitable tightening of credit feeding more and more foreclosures to a market that is not even hungry.

119   DinOR   2007 May 15, 4:18am  

Malcom,

Oh that's right! I remember now, a really glitzy web-site touting it as a "major event"! (Well it sure turned out to be a "major event" now didn't it?)

120   Malcolm   2007 May 15, 4:19am  

year over year - sorry

121   Malcolm   2007 May 15, 4:21am  

Another observation you made, can you imagine the conversations, the yelling the shouting, the firings that are going on in some of the lender offices right now. Can you imagine the anticipation of the LA and Riverside lenders right now, those auctions are coming up this and the following weekend.

122   DinOR   2007 May 15, 4:25am  

"a market that is not even hungry"

Eat! EAT!!!

Nope, not another morsel. My guess is that most of the people in attendance were bottom feeders "looking for value" (not the momentum players) of the last several years. This could set LA and SD becoming one city back by... another 5 years!

123   Malcolm   2007 May 15, 4:27am  

Whoever they were, it was a well advertised event with all of the houses available for viewing. I would say with a reasonable amount of confidence that a good percentage of the buyers today were aware of the auction. They were also cooperating with buyer agents, this is undisputably the new fair market value.

124   Malcolm   2007 May 15, 4:29am  

These prices are about 5 year old prices in my onpinon, maybe 2001,2002 range. It will be interesting because one of the houses is near me. I'm not worried because my strategy is to hold, and I bought at the fundamental value so I see it as a chance to move up, but I expect to see a lot of sad faces.

125   Malcolm   2007 May 15, 4:33am  

I am most interested in what the one in San Olijo Hills sold for. That was a 900K house with a 500K opening bid.

126   DinOR   2007 May 15, 4:40am  

With Riverside's sales down 45.1% and San Bernadino down 46.7% I wish them well over the next 2 weekends. Oh and I can WELL imagine the temper tantrums going on in office complexes all OVER the Southland!

Too bad most of it is misdirected.

127   sfbubblebuyer   2007 May 15, 4:43am  

Man, I don't buy the core inflation one bit. My expenses have risen considerably since January, that's for sure. :D

But then, I use gas a corn. And meat. Steaks are going up steadily. :(

128   Peter P   2007 May 15, 5:24am  

What happened to the latest thread?

129   Ozman   2007 May 15, 5:35am  

I think it was deleted, judging from the early responses.
I have to say it was weird and irrational.

130   Peter P   2007 May 15, 5:36am  

I have to say it was weird and irrational.

Huh?

131   Ozman   2007 May 15, 5:44am  

Talk of dreams and Tsunamis and disaster..
The author was implying he/she may be able to see the future :)

132   Peter P   2007 May 15, 5:45am  

So? What's wrong with some entertainment? :)

133   Ozman   2007 May 15, 5:47am  

Nothing. I didn't say it deserved deletion, just weird :)

134   DinOR   2007 May 15, 5:54am  

I don't have anything against entertainment it's just that many people that post or even lurk here aren't self-employed so to have that kind of talk on your monitor at the wrong time could create a whole lot of explaining.

SoCalMtgGuy had to create an entirely new web address just so people could keep up to speed while at work!

135   Peter P   2007 May 15, 6:22am  

Who wrote it?

136   Randy H   2007 May 15, 6:36am  

What did I miss?

137   Red Whine   2007 May 15, 6:44am  

You missed a new thread that was weird and scattered, and difficult to respond to. Then, it disappeared.

138   EBGuy   2007 May 15, 6:49am  

What did I miss?

Malcolm said the SD market has become unstuck and all hell will soon break loose. Casey evidently can make around $1000/month from Haterz. I think you could fund your kids education from Second Lifers if you try to generate a bit more animosity.

139   FormerAptBroker   2007 May 15, 6:56am  

astrid Says:

> FAB What’s a top 5 grad school?

I should have wrote “Business School” since that is what most of my friends talk about when we say “grad school”. It is amazing how many kids start at GSB, HBS, Wharton, Kellogg, and Sloan with liberal arts undergrad degrees and relatively low math skills…

140   Peter P   2007 May 15, 7:01am  

This time it is different. The H1B quota is now back down at 65000/yr. I believe it was close to 200K/yr a few years earlier.

In fact, I heard that 60%+ of H1B hopefuls who applied *on the first day* for FY2008 was rejected. Will foreign students still want to study/work here?

141   Peter P   2007 May 15, 7:04am  

The person (who shall remain nameless) that wrote that last thread asked that it be removed.

How could you have known that? I wonder. ;)

142   astrid   2007 May 15, 7:14am  

FAB,

Thanks. Though I do somewhat disagree on the substance. I took an investment finance class at Haas one summer and recalled it being relatively easy for this math near-illiterate.

My father has a physics Ph.D and we were talking about math and science last sunday. His view was that the average person does not need to know much math beyond basic geometry, algebra, and understand the basic concept of derivatives and trig. We agreed that the main missing piece from general education is basic understanding for statistics and logic, which is easy for even people of low math skills.

143   DennisN   2007 May 15, 7:44am  

"I should have wrote “Business School” since that is what most of my friends talk about when we say “grad school”. "

I would never even think B School when I hear about grad school. For me it was physics...or math...or finally law.

The only problem in learning about statistics and probability is that it ruins the fun of gambling for the rest of your life....looks too much like homework problems!

144   Peter P   2007 May 15, 7:48am  

His view was that the average person does not need to know much math beyond basic geometry, algebra, and understand the basic concept of derivatives and trig.

If everyone knows how to use the four-function calculator well (square root optional), the market will be more rational.

145   FormerAptBroker   2007 May 15, 7:49am  

DennisN Says:

> The only problem in learning about statistics and
> probability is that it ruins the fun of gambling for
> the rest of your life….looks too much like homework
> problems!

I had a professor that called the lottery a “tax on stupid people that don’t understand statistics”…

146   Peter P   2007 May 15, 7:52am  

I had a professor that called the lottery a “tax on stupid people that don’t understand statistics”…

It is about psychological framing. But I welcome stupidity tax. :)

147   sfbubblebuyer   2007 May 15, 8:11am  

Yah, I got glared at once when somebody said they were going to grad school, I asked what they were studying. When they said to get their MBA, I said "Oh, I thought you meant REAL grad school."

148   Peter P   2007 May 15, 8:24am  

Business school IS a real grad school. There are disputes about whether JDs are real doctors though.

149   Peter P   2007 May 15, 8:25am  

It is a school for graduates.

150   HARM   2007 May 15, 8:38am  

New thread: So, long, David!

151   DennisN   2007 May 15, 8:58am  

"There are disputes about whether JDs are real doctors though. "

Interesting thought. Peter, why don't you let me try operating on you. Then we both will know the truth of the statement.

« First        Comments 112 - 151 of 207       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste