0
0

Lower Rents


 invite response                
2008 Jan 17, 12:12am   29,170 views  318 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (59)   💰tip   ignore  

for rent

Given the record level of empty housing, rents seem to be falling in most parts of the country.

But my own rent went up for the first time in 5 years recently. Though it's still lower than it was when I first moved in during the dot-com bubble. I got a good rent reduction after the crash.

Rents should respond basically to employment and salary levels, but I don't see employment or salaries improving much around me in the SF Bay Area.

Any idea what's going on? Sometimes I suspect that the press writes about rising rent, and then landlords actually do raise it just because they think they can.

Patrick

#housing

« First        Comments 136 - 175 of 318       Last »     Search these comments

136   LowlySmartRenter   2008 Jan 18, 3:54am  

$100 goes a long way to support my sushi habit. ;-) No worries. I'm sure someone will bail me out.

137   skibum   2008 Jan 18, 4:12am  

EBGuy,
I have no complaints about Sutter around here (PAMF, as you mention). They are growing pretty rapidly, and as a result I feel they are diluting their pool of previously top notch MDs across the board. Some of their more recent "acquisitions" have included docs I have been less impressed with.

138   skibum   2008 Jan 18, 4:17am  

RE: the Shrub's "stimulus" package, can you believe the point of this all is to get "us consumers" to go out and spend it on crap? No, it's not to pay down credit card debt, pay one more month of a neg-am mortgage, or even a car loan payment. It's so we go out to a box store and buy more useless plastic crap to keep this sham of a "consumer-based" economy going.

To use a medical analogy (while we're still on that tangent), it's time to stop feeding the cancerous growth. It's time to "bite the bullet" and cut the darn thing off, for god's sake. And doing it with no anesthesia would be preferable, IMO...

139   anonymous   2008 Jan 18, 4:34am  

FAB makes a very good point. Ethnically coherent European neighborhoods have very low crime, but introduce a bunch of different groups, some with no history of civilization, all rivals, and you'll get a bloodbath.

It's not politically correct to talk about this, but the best way to cure the problems in Hunters Point would be to fence it off, and drop in tons of guns and ammo. Give them 6 months. You might get 5 people left lol.

140   Peter P   2008 Jan 18, 5:15am  

What if they break through the fence with the weapons?

141   Peter P   2008 Jan 18, 5:19am  

We must instigate a market in which the right people breed more than the wrong people.

BTW, I believe Europe is falling apart because no welfare state can sustain without a massive cache of natural resources (God's gift).

142   HeadSet   2008 Jan 18, 5:24am  

things that work in Europe will only work in places that are similar to Europe.

Isn't England doing a triage of sorts for acces to the National Health Service? I heard they will start denying treatment to smokers, for instance. If one has to ration, denying specific treatments for diseases people bring on themselves seems fair.

143   HeadSet   2008 Jan 18, 5:26am  

I believe Europe is falling apart because no welfare state can sustain without a massive cache of natural resources (God’s gift).

Is Japan falling apart?

144   Peter P   2008 Jan 18, 5:27am  

If one has to ration, denying specific treatments for diseases people bring on themselves seems fair.

What if one day it becomes politically incorrect to eat meat and animal "rights" activists can "prove" "scientifically" that consuming meat is "harmful" to health?

145   Peter P   2008 Jan 18, 5:27am  

Is Japan falling apart?

Yes. But they will survive because they eat fish.

146   HeadSet   2008 Jan 18, 5:30am  

Peter p

I said if one HAS to ration.....

147   PermaRenter   2008 Jan 18, 5:35am  

I will celebrate when DOW drops below 12,000:

Dow 12,099.30 -59.91 -0.49%

148   PermaRenter   2008 Jan 18, 5:36am  

Wall street is disappointed with size of president's stimulus package:

Stocks End Rough Week With Modest Drop
Wall Street Caps Rough Week With Modest Decline As Stimulus Plan Fails Draws Little Reaction

NEW YORK (AP) -- Wall Street ended a painful week with another decline Friday as skittish investors unable to hold on to much optimism about the economy drew little comfort from President Bush's stimulus plan.

The day's trading reflected how fractious Wall Street has been in the new year. Investors pulled back from a big early advance, with the major indexes trading mixed as Bush began to speak. By the time the president finished announcing a plan for about $145 billion worth of tax relief, the indexes were well into negative territory.

"It's disappointed in the size of the economic growth package. Wall Street's showing its displeasure," said Kim Caughey, equity research analyst at Fort Pitt Capital Group in Pittsburgh. "Honestly, I think the institutional investors understand the limits to the government's ability to enact economic change."

149   Peter P   2008 Jan 18, 5:39am  

I will celebrate when DOW drops below 12,000:

I think DOW will see 15000. But not before it hits 7500.

NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE

150   HeadSet   2008 Jan 18, 5:51am  

Wow, DOW at 7500. I presume that would mean oil, housing, and products will all be cheap.

So, with such a "wealth effect" created by people spending so much less on necessities free up enough discressionary spending to run the DOW to 15,000?

Or are you thinking recession to 7500, then printing press to 15,000?

I am hoping for deflation caused by the credit contraction. Since credit seemed to have the same effect as money recently, a cutback in credit may act just like a contraction in the money supply (deflation by definition).

151   StuckInBA   2008 Jan 18, 5:54am  

I will celebrate when DOW drops below 12,000:

I will celebrate when down payments of at least 25% become mandatory.

152   Peter P   2008 Jan 18, 5:56am  

Wow, DOW at 7500. I presume that would mean oil, housing, and products will all be cheap.

Historically, it is not uncommon for the DOW to "cost" only a few ounces of gold.

I think oil price will come down.

So, with such a “wealth effect” created by people spending so much less on necessities free up enough discressionary spending to run the DOW to 15,000?

I did not state a time frame. Perhaps DOW 15000 will happen within the next 200 years?

153   PermaRenter   2008 Jan 18, 5:58am  

>> I will celebrate when down payments of at least 25% become mandatory.

This is an impossible dream. If this is true then Wall Street earnings will fall dramatically. Basically banks print money to charge interest. Now if you limit credit to REAL SAVINGS (25% down payment) then wall street's source of income and bonus will disappear. Basically they want more and more of ZERO DOWN types ....

154   DinOR   2008 Jan 18, 5:59am  

Headset,

That's a point I can't hear enough of! Imagine, your house payment is no more than 3-5x income and you're *not pouring 60%+ of your paycheck into a McHacienda?

But NO!

must__support__housing__prices.... ugh.. and__spending..

155   Peter P   2008 Jan 18, 6:01am  

Both price control (in China) and "recession aversion" (here) will fail miserably.

156   DinOR   2008 Jan 18, 6:02am  

-your house PAYMENT

+your house :(

157   HeadSet   2008 Jan 18, 6:02am  

I did not state a time frame. Perhaps DOW 15000 will happen within the next 200 years?

Are you a budding politician?

I will celebrate when down payments of at least 25% become mandatory.

If you do run for office, I (and possibly StuckInBA) will vote for you if you support such a law. This law would be more benificial than all the grandstanding done on "payday lending."

158   DinOR   2008 Jan 18, 6:07am  

O.K, you get NO MID and if you want to sell your home without cap. gains you may do so (after TEN years!)

STILL... want to enter a bidding war?

"I" for one don't think there's anything inherently evil w/ Zero Down loans. If that, in and of itself were the sole determining factor I should have been able to auction my zero down VA loan to the highest bidder?

159   anonymous   2008 Jan 18, 6:07am  

I'd say the 20% - 25% down payment was a good idea because not only was it decent protection against ending up "underwater" but it also filtered through only those who COULD save.

I've done shit jobs, really low menial stuff, but even on those jobs now I realize, I could have saved money. It may have involved asking the supermarket for old veggies "for my rabbit" and some odd jobs on the side, scrounging dumpsters a lot more than I did, but even on a shit job it's possible to save. So, generally "low income" is not a cover-all excuse to not be a saver. It's more of a mindset, you're a saver or you're not, and in the US people are brainwashed to not be savers but they can break out of the brainwashing.

160   Peter P   2008 Jan 18, 6:10am  

“I” for one don’t think there’s anything inherently evil w/ Zero Down loans. If that, in and of itself were the sole determining factor I should have been able to auction my zero down VA loan to the highest bidder?

If the market allows zero down loans, I don't see any problem. Just don't use my tax dollars to mitigate risks stemming from such loans. :)

161   HeadSet   2008 Jan 18, 6:13am  

O.K, you get NO MID and if you want to sell your home without cap. gains you may do so (after TEN years!)

That, along with no gov backing of low/no down loans, would be the best "Affordable Housing" policy.

162   PermaRenter   2008 Jan 18, 6:14am  

>> So, generally “low income” is not a cover-all excuse to not be a saver. It’s more of a mindset, you’re a saver or you’re not, and in the US people are brainwashed to not be savers but they can break out of the brainwashing.

Banks and Government works hand in hand to create anti saving mentality. It is a rational response of masses to NOT TO SAVE. SAVERS ARE LOSERS. Please watch this video:

Money as Debt : Animated Video by Paul Grignon
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9050474362583451279

163   Peter P   2008 Jan 18, 6:15am  

That, along with no gov backing of low/no down loans, would be the best “Affordable Housing” policy.

There should be no government backing of ANY loan.

164   DinOR   2008 Jan 18, 6:16am  

Well, to be truthful there is a certain amount of value in having a VA "assumable" loan. But only b/c it made the transaction smoother.

165   Peter P   2008 Jan 18, 6:17am  

Well, to be truthful there is a certain amount of value in having a VA “assumable” loan.

VA is different because it is a perk for deserving soldiers.

166   DinOR   2008 Jan 18, 6:18am  

@Headset,

Exactly. (Like realtors are going to tell first time buyers the "tax benefits" of owning a home aren't already "baked-in" to the price)?

167   HeadSet   2008 Jan 18, 6:19am  

If the market allows zero down loans, I don’t see any problem.

Those of us old enough to have tried to buy houses in the 80's or earlier know the phrase "Nothing Down, Banker's Frown." Without a VA or FHA loan, you had to cough up 20% down for a owner occupied home and 50% for an investment property. Plus, the banks wanted you to state the source of the down payment and would not allow the downpayment to be borrowed. I do not think the market will support zero down without gov backing. Often enough, gov backing just raised prices and planted the seeds of future forclosures.

168   DinOR   2008 Jan 18, 6:20am  

How about un-deserving sailors?

I had a Division Officer that swore I "had my OWN Navy" (as clearly I wasn't part of their's) :)

169   Peter P   2008 Jan 18, 6:21am  

Un-deserving sailors should be made to scrub the decks. :)

170   HeadSet   2008 Jan 18, 6:25am  

Exactly. (Like realtors are going to tell first time buyers the “tax benefits” of owning a home aren’t already “baked-in” to the price)?

Even worse. For many first time buyers in "fly over land" the MID did not quit add up to the Standard Deduction.

171   HeadSet   2008 Jan 18, 6:28am  

Underserving sailors? I can think of many things sailors deserve. None printable.

172   revengeofaone   2008 Jan 18, 6:33am  

it was very difficult to explain to my fatherinlaw that one of the reasons we didn't want to buy a bigger house in a more expensive area was that the much higher property tax wasn't deductible because in my situation I have to pay AMT.

-He didn't know what AMT was
-He didn't believe me
-He thinks I'm an idiot

So not only do most people think they are increasing their tax deductions by paying interest, they also assume all the taxes are deductible, no matter their amt situation!

NOT INVESTMENT or TAX ADVICE! I AM NOT A PROFESSIONAL FINANCE PERSON!!

173   DinOR   2008 Jan 18, 6:43am  

revenge,

Outstanding! I'm o.k w/ the first 2 but #3 gets my goat. And I suppose deductions fade out above ____ anyway? Not to "one better" you but you'd be surprised how many Oregonians honestly believe that by paying more in property tax they're somehow getting over on the fed's.

It would be funny if it wasn't so, so.. stupid.

174   PermaRenter   2008 Jan 18, 6:45am  

Banknotes, when they are printed, are considered the property of the Central Bank. They are not given to the State to spend, but are brought into circulation against a corresponding debt. Anyone wanting some of those notes to spend, has to "buy" them by giving up some of their credit. And in any case, most of the money in circulation (more than 90%) is not banknotes but "credit".

When you go to your bank asking for money, the loan you get is created right there in your bank. The "money" consists of figures on your bank account, and it can be spent writing checks, giving an order to transfer or drawing the cash. Banks only have to have a small percentage of their loaned-out money actually available. The rest can be paid out just by moving some figures from one account to another. The important thing to know: Money is created just by inserting some numbers into a computer.

175   EBGuy   2008 Jan 18, 6:49am  

I am hoping for deflation caused by the credit contraction.
CR just had a post noting that writedowns hit $100 billion. It is rather hard to comprehend that this amount of money has been vaporized. Interesting to note that the "stimulus" is around this amount...

Hey, revengeofaone, have some sympathy for the guy. Remember the first time some told you that there are two different tax codes, you have to do your taxes twice, and pay the higher of the two amounts. It was kinda like, you're joking right.... and then, uhhh, does this mean my refund is in jeopardy?

@DinOr, you'll like this one. At socketsite there is a commercial landlord who wants to get out of the business. The plan is to 1031 exchange into SFH rentals, then live in each serially for two years to claim The Exemption. Nice way to aviod cap. gains and CA taxes...

« First        Comments 136 - 175 of 318       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions