« First « Previous Comments 92 - 131 of 273 Next » Last » Search these comments
> * No one creates land (except perhaps in Holland).
It would not be hard to turn Richardson Bay in Marin in to a subdivision since at high tide it is only a few feet deep.
I couldn't find a map quickly right now....but present-day SF bay is only about 50% of the size it was pre-Anglo. People have been filling it in and "claiming new land" for a long time. "North Beach", now inland, once really was a beach in the 1800's. ;) The Marina district was an inlet that got filled with debris from the 1906 earthquake.
That's a difference in definition. To me speculation isn't a calculated risk, that's what makes it speculation. Buying a stock based on a trend is speculation. Buying a business with an income stream is a calculated risk.
Just for that, I’m going to try to bid up the price of sushi.
Be careful....I understand Peter P is dangerous when "cornered". :)
The problem of "doing something stupid with lots of people" is that the smart people bail early. I'm not certain that I qualify as "smart" but bailing out of Cambrian Park SJ in May 2006 is starting to look that way. I figure AU is already fairly pricey and that other precious metals like AG won't be as much of a hedge. The industrial use of AG is declining and there's still lots of AG in the ground around here just waiting for the price to get a little higher. What do you guys know about PT? As the world turns to more cat cons in cars and trucks, wouldn't investing in PT be both a precious metals hedge and a "green power investment"?
Peter P,
Oh, I suppose speculation isn' "bad,' I just prefer to create wealth than merely hoard it.
Fixing up or building a home up for rent adds wealth that did not exist before, Arbatrage and speculation just reallocate wealth that already existed.
Isn't a large part of SF built on reclaimed bay land? I thought that was part of why the 1906 earthquake was so bad because it shook up the looser fill material.
DennisN Says:
February 27th, 2008 at 2:54 pm
"Be careful….I understand Peter P is dangerous when “corneredâ€. "
Nice guy, just don't cut in front of him at the sushi bar.
I just prefer to create wealth than merely hoard it.
Huh?
Arbitrage and speculation just reallocate wealth that already existed.
Well, if it creates wealth for me, that is good enough. :)
Randy H will spin in his rental house if he hears this: human society is a ZERO-SUM game.
DennisN
Good point on the PT. But do hydrogen/electric/fuel cell cars need catalytic converters? Tesla types and plug-in may be one invention away from mass acceptance.
human society is a ZERO-SUM game.
If that were true we would still be merely allocating caves and hunting/gathering lands. Societies has obviously created vast wealth where none was before.
I said this once before but I went and saw some artifacts from King Tut in LA and concluded that the equivilent of most of these treasures were attainable to most people. The rise of mass production, innovations, and our modern forms of government have proved that entire societies can advance. It doesn't have to be the case that one person has to get poorer for another person to get richer.
A celebrity marriage and divorce is a zero sum game.
I'm telling you guys, the plug in electric and or hybrid models are about to totally disrupt how we look and think about cars. The Tesla concept is just a pricier version of the Aptera.
Well, it all depends upon the meaning of wealth.
It is arguable that wealth represents the ability for one to impose his will on others. If you disagree, I urge you to think again.
As a society, we can improve our technology but we cannot alter the power relationship.
If you adopt this power hierarchical definition of wealth, it is not difficult to see the "zero sum game" within our society. But if you do, it is very easy to become a misanthropist.
I realized the country is at 35% real unemployment now.
Every household had 2 incomes + the home earning a 3rd income. Home is now 'not earning money' so we go from 5% to 35% unemployment. Basic Math.
And most homes had higher incomes than the owners.
Plug-in hybrids have a gas engine so yes they will still need a cat con. The big push for cat cons will be in countries that currently don't require them but are rapidly expanding their private transport system, e.g. India and China.
RE: cat con
Rhodium is now at $9000/oz. It was $450/oz in late 2003.
And now that I looked I see that Krugerrands are a rip-off: market price but you only get 1 oz of 91.6% AU. I know pure gold is too soft to handle but couldn't they bump the weight of the coin to reflect 1 oz pure AU?
www.bulliondirect.com/catalog/showProductDetail.do?id=175433586&gclid=CNShuenD5ZECFRM8awodRiwAeg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krugerrand
Since the Krugerrand is minted from gold alloy that is 91.67 percent pure (22 karats), the actual weight of a "one ounce" coin is 1.0909 troy ounces (33.93 g), to provide one troy ounce of pure gold.
@ Dennis-
That is what a gold eagle is made up of. The weight is slightly more than 1oz so that there can be a full oz of gold without being too soft. Also, I believe the buffalo is in that camp or better.
"Every household had 2 incomes + the home earning a 3rd income. Home is now ‘not earning money’ so we go from 5% to 35% unemployment. Basic Math."
I like that. Yes, the unemployment of homes must be addressed!
Just think... if we could get all homes working again, and in fact BOOST their incomes....once prices got high enough, say 20X incomes of their residents, even with a modest 5% growth rate, everybody in the whole country could just quit their jobs, and and live off HELOCs from their ever expanding equity. Nobody would ever have to work again, because our homes are working for us!
It's just basic math!
@ Malcolm-
Just like 60 is the new 40 or whatever, the millionare is the new thousandare!
OK I feel better about Krugerrands now.
And to round out the cat con discussion:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palladium_as_an_investment
Palladium prices recently rose to about $375 per troy ounce, which is still historically low.
Recent years' palladium surplus condition was caused by the Russian government selling off government stockpiles built up during the Soviet Era, at a pace of about 1.6 to 2 million ounces a year. The amount and status of this stockpile is kept as a state secret. The Russian stockpile sales over the years have been absorbed by strong investment demand from speculators who believe that once the Russian stockpile is exhausted, the palladium price should spike up significantly.
I love natural resources as an investment. :)
Still looking into blue gold...
Hey Mark,
We don't even need that. Let's just increase those rebate checks coming this spring to say 100k and then send them out every few months or so. Prosperity for everyone!!!
Paul Says:
February 27th, 2008 at 3:48 pm
@ Malcolm-
"Just like 60 is the new 40 or whatever, the millionare is the new thousandare!"
That's how I look at it, that's why I don't pat myself on the back. Everyone who had a decent house from before 99 had at least 300K in equity in the desireable parts of CA.
Remember in the German Weimar Republic everyone was a Trillionare but of course that didn't mean much at the end!
DennisN Says:
February 27th, 2008 at 3:30 pm
"Plug-in hybrids have a gas engine so yes they will still need a cat con."
I wonder if the Aptera does. It's gas motor is just a small efficient generator which only charges the batteries. I suppose it probably does.
The coin dealer who cashed out my gold looked at a Mexican coin I happened to have. He told me I could get a dime if I had 999 more of them.
Malcolm Says:
> Isn’t a large part of SF built on reclaimed bay
> land? I thought that was part of why the 1906
> earthquake was so bad because it shook up the
> looser fill material.
The 1906 "earthquake" was not that bad (7.8 vs the 7.1 earthquake in 1989) it was the 1906 "fire" that destroyed most of SF (since hundreds of oil lamps tipped over and all the fire trucks in town were still pulled by horses)...
If you are interested in blue gold, look into PHO
Yes. I was looking into PHO too. Thanks!
Harm - I 100% agree with your assessment. Pisses me off, but I agree.
The coin dealer who cashed out my gold
You actually went "physical" with your gold!? Did you go the "toilet tank" route or safety deposit box? Just curious as I may buy some Eagles with the gov't rebate money if we are still under $1000/oz. I am a bit paranoid, though, about getting bonked on the head exiting the coin shop (keep the motor running honey!). Can anyone recommend a reputable shop in the East Bay; otherwise, I am considering Kitco or www.nwtmintbullion.com.
I pledged to myself that I would go "all in" with the spare retirement money once we reached an all time (nominal) high, but chickened out and am waiting on GLD orders to be filled at
less than $800 (sigh, should just put in a sell at $2000/oz and ride it out with what I've got.) That Euro has got to fall, right?!
FuzzyMath Says:
What is everyone’s gut feel for the future of mortgage interest rates? Seems like their slipping upward even while the Fed is lowering.
...
Seems like alot of the price drops in housing could be moot for buyers sitting on the sidelines waiting for the bottom.
This is a favorite scare tactic of the realtwhore-troll crowd, and is probably an effective sales-tactic with those who suck at math.
Price-drops are the best for a buyer because they lower the true cost of ownership. Besides, a buyer can refinance into a lower rate but not into a lower price.
If someone buys now, they will end up paying today's price for a property that will be worth a lot less when interest rates are higher.
Do some real math instead of the fuzzy kind, it is pretty simple.
I know many on this board believe FDR was a hero. But I am still very angry every time I think of the prospect of gold confiscation.
EBGuy Says:
February 27th, 2008 at 4:26 pm
"The coin dealer who cashed out my gold
You actually went “physical†with your gold!? Did you go the “toilet tank†route or safety deposit box? Just curious as I may buy some Eagles with the gov’t rebate money if we are still under $1000/oz. I am a bit paranoid, though, about getting bonked on the head exiting the coin shop (keep the motor running honey!)."
Yes, I went physical, and yes at one time I had a 10oz bar which used to make me nervous. Probably not a good idea to publish my movements here but yes you do then have something tangible to worry about. Even though I paid a little more to cash out at the coin shop I don't like the idea of mailing the gold to someone in AZ and hoping a check will come back. I did that once and it went perfectly fine. I used to buy gold on Ebay. Sometimes I would get it right at spot including shipping.
I read your follow up post EB. Like anything in quantity you might buy some at a starting price and then continously try to buy it below. I really have to say that I'm concerned when everyone seems so sure something will move this or that way but I'm not a psychic.
This site offers some "comfort" :) :
Finally, gold and silver today don't represent the huge pool of wealth they represented in 1933. Why risk wide-spread disobedience to steal such a tiny plum? If the government wants to steal a big pool of wealth, they'll snatch your pension funds and IRAs, not your gold. Tyrants always shoot for the biggest target.
A friend at my old office (6 years ago) was buying silver coins (like morgans) on ebay at below the spot price of $4.50.
« First « Previous Comments 92 - 131 of 273 Next » Last » Search these comments
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Portfolio Caps Will Be Lifted (Update2)
Phase 1 : Congress raised the GSE (Fannie and Freddie) conforming loan limit from $417,000 to $729,000.
Phase 2 : Congress instructs the OFHEO to lift portfolio caps on the GSEs (which were placed there because of GSE "accounting irregularities" and concerns about the GSE's size/share of market).
Next up...
Phase 3 : Eliminating all qualifying “standards†on the type of mortagages the GSEs can buy: allowing no-docs/NINJAs, neg-ams, I/Os, option ARMs and assorted hybrids.
Phase 4 : Congress making implicit GSE guarantees explicit, and taxpayers assuming/liquidating the portfolios of the soon-to-be bankrupt GSEs (RTC, part II)
Can’t happen, you say? Never say “never†where a bought-off "Socialize all losses" Con-gress and whining, clueless, bleating "why me?" sheeple are concerned.
HARM