0
0

I'm Too Tired To Think


 invite response                
2006 May 10, 2:11am   27,170 views  272 comments

by SQT15   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

I have come to the conclusion that it is impossible to suitably follow up on the last thread posted by Randy.

I do not have the economic chops to try, so I won't even attempt to fake it.

Besides, after reading this blog for more than a year, my head is swimming in all the stats, facts and predictions everyone has made. I can't decide what direction to go to next, and I'm too tired to try. Is that bad?

Besides, if we can post 401 comments on the "Duh" thread, we can talk about anything, can't we?

« First        Comments 70 - 109 of 272       Last »     Search these comments

70   GallopingCheetah   2006 May 10, 8:57am  

I've been drinking this Odwalla shit from the cafeteria. I think I am getting sick of it, although it's supposed to be good for me, especially since I rarely eat vegie when I cook. What is your favorite flavor of Odwalla?

71   GallopingCheetah   2006 May 10, 8:57am  

Requiem,

We are on the same side.

BTW, is that M's Requiem?

72   GallopingCheetah   2006 May 10, 9:01am  

I like Parisienne life. Life in US is too harsh, too rushed, too unpleasant. In Paris, right now, I can sit in the cafe, actually the weather should start to be nice, so I sit outside, sipping wine, watching people coming back (woops, slipping away) from work, checking out cute girls, eating healthy snacks and fruits, relaxing, debating philosophie and contemplating meaning of life, planning suicide, blah, blah, blah.

73   requiem   2006 May 10, 9:04am  

Yep, is Wolfgang's.

I rotate Odwallas. I go through the tangerine, grapefruit, and orange juice jugs for the fridge, and use the single-serving containers of "wellness" when I think I might be getting sick. The smoothies are also ok, but I avoid the green, purple, or protein flavors.

74   GallopingCheetah   2006 May 10, 9:06am  

The protein flavor of smoothie is really disgusting. I tried once. It tasted like medicine.

75   GallopingCheetah   2006 May 10, 9:13am  

test test again

76   GallopingCheetah   2006 May 10, 9:15am  

I really wonder: Does anyone really take himself seriously, despite his appearance of doing so?

77   Michael Holliday   2006 May 10, 9:15am  

"Priced to sell...$788,000...Square Feet: 1,647...Lot Size: N/A...Year Built: 1973...On Market: 153 days..."

Ha, ha!

Now isn't that precious?

78   astrid   2006 May 10, 9:17am  

Michael,

Is that a northern Arizona listing?

79   Michael Holliday   2006 May 10, 9:24am  

No, that's the Fremont address above.

I grew up in San Jose, moved to Pheonix seven years ago.

Even so, those figures look zany! I can picture the house: your average, nothing much, '70s suburban house.

Simply wacky for the common working man to pay so much for so little!

80   LILLL   2006 May 10, 9:25am  

Bork
Thank you

81   GallopingCheetah   2006 May 10, 9:28am  

But you must agree that I did make some contributions other than these outrageous comments.

Also, some people take themselves too seriously.

82   GallopingCheetah   2006 May 10, 9:29am  

If one takes himself too seriously, he is susceptible to manipulation (by people close to him, by the media, by the government, by anything).

83   StuckInBA   2006 May 10, 9:38am  

requiem Says:
Well damn, there goes my chance to revive one of the older wars.

That war is over. All sane people now use VI. The more sane of the lot use (G)VIM in particular.

Now if that goes unanswered, the war is really over !

84   zeke   2006 May 10, 9:52am  

emacs in vi mode

85   requiem   2006 May 10, 10:28am  

FB = Fvcked Buyer.

emacs in vi mode
Uh... burn the heretic?

86   requiem   2006 May 10, 10:32am  

Softest, since technically you could eventually pay off the loan, "renting the money" doesn't feel quite right. (But I use it anyway.)

Assuming the property is sold, it's closer to renting the house from the bank, combined with an enforced savings account. Eventually, if you've saved enough, you can use that account to buy the house.

87   Different Sean   2006 May 10, 10:40am  

dual flush toilets are mandatory here as a building standard -- there are 2 buttons -- 3 litres and 6 litres... so the concept works well enough when you have 2 choices...

and water is so scarce they are giving away low flow showerheads... but they fail to recycle stormwater at all, they modelled the whole system on european ideas where there's so much rain the aim is to get it out to sea asap.

88   Peter P   2006 May 10, 10:49am  

dual flush toilets are mandatory here as a building standard — there are 2 buttons — 3 litres and 6 litres… so the concept works well enough when you have 2 choices…

That is perhaps a good idea. It is confusing though. How about pulling up for 3L and pushing down for 6L?

89   Different Sean   2006 May 10, 11:00am  

they are usually designed now with two different sized buttons, in a stylish interlocked design or whatever -- the equal sized ones will have a logo with a half circle and a full circle or similar...

to say nothing of composting toilets and waterless urinals...
http://www.watersave.com.au/Uridan/default.asp

90   Different Sean   2006 May 10, 11:10am  

I like Parisienne life. Life in US is too harsh, too rushed, too unpleasant. In Paris, right now, I can sit in the cafe, debating philosophy and contemplating meaning of life

probably not advisable doing that in here, cheetah... the nation of shopkeepers has morphed into a bigger nation of bigger shopkeepers...

91   GallopingCheetah   2006 May 10, 11:12am  

D.S.,

here = ?

92   GallopingCheetah   2006 May 10, 11:12am  

D.S.,

because I remember seeing somewhere that England was called the nation of shopkeepers.

93   Different Sean   2006 May 10, 11:20am  

slyly oblique reference, hee hee. but i have lived and worked in UK and Oz, and have dual citizenship. currently in Oz...

94   Different Sean   2006 May 10, 11:23am  

I despise those low flow showerheads though. They must only work on the bald. I would consider a great showerhead with an on/off valve for times of drought.

alternatively, they were also giving away electronic timers for 3 minute showers, heh

maybe the bald could get away with the revolutionary new waterless showers...

95   GallopingCheetah   2006 May 10, 11:24am  

maybe the bald could get away with the revolutionary new waterless showers…

That's bad, 'cuz when he goes to his barber his head is going to stink.

96   LILLL   2006 May 10, 11:30am  

GC
Your posts are showing not just a moodiness but a genuine and disturbong imbalance and inability to hold a train of thought.
Have you gone off your lithium?

97   astrid   2006 May 10, 11:34am  

Meanwhile, my Opinel is now incredibly sharp and ready to do damage on some Fuji apples...

98   astrid   2006 May 10, 11:36am  

Linda,

Yum, lithium. I can chase that with a vodka tonic and some Nick Drake :)

99   LILLL   2006 May 10, 11:40am  

I think perhaps that GC has proven himself to be the worst kind of troll. His blatherings have engaged some badinage, however all in all, he has derailed several of our threads and offended some of our lurkers and posters(ie Bork). His meandering mind is dangerous to the integrity and reputation of Patrick.net.
For the longevity of this site,
I vote that he is banned.
Honestly, this blog has degraded somewhat thanks to Gentle Cheetah and his multiple alter egos. I have to skip a lot of comments originated by/in reply to GC. It started with homosexual fantasies, turned into pedophilia topic and now it seems to be taking a “suicide” turn.

BTW- Polished concrete sinks...MMMMM

100   LILLL   2006 May 10, 11:45am  

Anybody?
Or are you just too tired to think?

101   astrid   2006 May 10, 11:46am  

Linda,

It's really best to ignore him and erase on an comment by comment basis. He just throws a lot of random stuff out. But honestly, I can see where he's coming from, even though I don't happen to agree with that perspective.

Here's a song for you:

http://www.candlerecords.com.au/candle/bin/candlebands.cfm?bandName=han#

go down and click on "I wish I was beautiful for you"

102   tsusiat   2006 May 10, 11:52am  

Linda -

should I repeat it? GC is some bored Microsoft desk jockey, perhaps even assigned to pick up the pulse of the times here at Patrick.net.

Either that, or he is a bored financier with a real interest in Auburn Bank Corp.

Take your pick.

103   LILLL   2006 May 10, 11:53am  

Astrid
I know you've been a fan of his as you've defended him from the start. You said that he probably wouldn't act on such statements...(BTW...how do you know? Is he an old friend or something?)
I'm talking about for the integrity of the site to have someone throwing out random flamelike comments...

Anyway, Bork said it well.

Whatever the rest of you choose as a group.

I come
to
this site
for sanity
not
insanity

104   LILLL   2006 May 10, 11:56am  

tsusiat
But the pulse of Patrick.net has been the same for a long time.
Steady, strong, and very furry. :)

105   astrid   2006 May 10, 12:01pm  

tsusiat,

How exciting! Patrick could be bought out with Big Bill's money. Maybe he could treat us all to sushi.

Linda,

Huh? If you thought that, you really don't know me at all. I don't advocate banning unless the individual is clearly a troll. I don't see it yet. I don't even advocate banning Bap33 or DS or Robert Cote or Ha Ha, even though I disagree with just about everything they've said.

106   Different Sean   2006 May 10, 12:02pm  

nomadtoons:
I’d much rather get on with my life somewhere else.

with the animation work being virtual, etc, you could probably live and work anywhere and cyber-commute, couldn't you? or look at more lucrative areas in similar types of work in LA like hollywood special effects in Maya or something... assuming those guys are getting good pay, and not living at home with their parents, heh

or have i got the wrong profile?

the other options here seem to be that people are moving further and further out of the greater metro area up and down the coast to where i assume it is more affordable -- i just did a 1 hour trip about 80km south and had forgotten what regional living is like -- more relaxed and costs are 2/3 of the city for many things, and yet they have a beach lifestyle. only nuisance is having to commute if you are working in the city, altho there's a good train line up and down the coast. i don't think it's fair that housing allocation works like that, but it's a reasonable compromise in the market society -- i bandy phrases like 'key worker initiatives' around with govt people in affordable housing, but they tend to look blank. further, the US has got huge areas of affordability still in comparison with the pattern in other boom countries.

like someone was saying, tradesmen have to drive for hours these days to get to a job -- from an embedded energy and personal cost point of view, it's incredibly wasteful -- i.e. these are extra 'hidden' costs of construction, altho i don't know what the answer is -- michael mobbs points out that when he is constructing a best practice 'green' village somewhere, there's an endless convoy of tradesmen arriving from 2 hours drive away each way every day from the affordability belt...

107   Different Sean   2006 May 10, 12:15pm  

I don’t even advocate banning Bap33 or DS or Robert Cote or Ha Ha, even though I disagree with just about everything they’ve said.

and others agree and voice similar views. so i don't think it's worth 'even advocating banning' simply on the basis of belonging to a faction.

108   tsusiat   2006 May 10, 12:16pm  

SFWoman -

I don't mind digressions into economics, but statements meant to be un PC and designed to draw ire, well, I agree they could be better directed elsewhere.

Unfortuantely, I think surfer x opened the door in this direction with his *direct* diatribes, but for some reason I like Surfer X, maybe because the surfer's statements are rarely accompanied with pontifications about childhoods in China and cafe culture in Paris, all a kind of bloggish name dropping, if you know what I mean...

109   astrid   2006 May 10, 12:30pm  

Linda,

Intellectual voyeurs are a different creature from sexual predators. I've contemplated plenty of actions that I would never act upon. Thus far, you have no conclusive proof either ways. Furthermore, GC's offending comments were already erased (noticed that I have no problem with erasing on a comment by comment basis, only with all out banning?) and he more or less said he was wrong.

Are his comments obnoxious? Perhaps. But this blog doesn't delete for obnoxiousness alone. Or insults? You have no problem with Surfer-X's diatribes.

Yet you expect me to agree with you on a decision to ban and since I disagreed, then I must be a fan and a pedophila enabler.

What is the harm of GC unbanned, other than that he made a series of ill judged comments that pissed a bunch of unforgiving concerned mothers off? If he was indeed a sexual predator (a very unlikely thing, even his worst comments spoke of distant hypotheticals), what would be so bad about having him on this site, which has virtually no children traffic, no openly available contact information. His offending comments were already taken off.

Anyways, that's just fantastic. I'll keep in mind not to respond to your future queries, for fear of offending you further.

« First        Comments 70 - 109 of 272       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions