1
0

Flood of Shadow Real Estate Inventory about to hit the market will drive prices


 invite response                
2012 Jun 11, 9:49am   34,225 views  62 comments

by Lynnettemarcene   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

Flood of Shadow Real Estate Inventory about to hit the market will drive prices further down. My friend who works for B of A Foreclosure Dept informed me the National HUD moratorium was lifted last month in which they expect the next big wave of foreclosures to hit throughout the end of 2012 and 2013. The media cannot broadcast this because this information will cause potential buyers to hold off on buying properties which will further drive the prices down which will cause the banks to lose more money. Awe, poor executives at the banks…after they fraudulently used the gov’t bail out money to give themselves gigantic bonus, do we really feel sorry for them?
Below is what the media has posted so far as they do not want to publicize how grim the outlook really is.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/04/us-foreclosure-idUSBRE83319E20120404

#housing

« First        Comments 28 - 62 of 62        Search these comments

28   BoomAndBustCycle   2012 Jun 12, 8:29am  

Call it Crazy says

What happens if housing falls back to where it should be... 2.5 times wages? What year was that??

2.5x wages doesn't take into account interest rates... My home is approx 3.5x my wage... but i have a sub 4% rate.. if i bought a home 2.5x my current income in early 2000.. I would have been paying more per month upon purchase.

Refinancing would change things.. but 2.5x wages while safe.. isn't really the average for many major US cities. Even in high rate environments.

If interest rates stay below 4% for as long as they did in Japan... Then a long slow slide is all that will occur.. and eventually nominal home prices will rise.

29   tatupu70   2012 Jun 12, 8:34am  

BoomAndBustCycle says

2.5x wages doesn't take into account interest rates... My home is approx 3.5x my wage... but i have a sub 4% rate.. if i bought a home 2.5x my current income in early 2000.. I would have been paying more per month upon purchase.

And home prices shouldn't be the metric--it should be mortgage balance.

30   tatupu70   2012 Jun 12, 8:37am  

Margaret Has A HorseFace says

WRONG.
Prices are construction costs + profit+ lot costs less depreciation.
And don't you forget it.

Here's an econ 101 lesson for you.

Price is not a function of cost. It doesn't matter how much it cost to build a house, the price is a function of supply and demand.

31   tatupu70   2012 Jun 12, 8:42am  

Margaret Has A HorseFace says

When demand is met by new supply

Sure--when is that new supply coming? Housing starts are at all time lows, last I checked.

32   tatupu70   2012 Jun 12, 8:47am  

Margaret Has A HorseFace says

You better check again because we're building and we'll continue to build and sell at double digit percentages under resale housing.

OK--I checked again. Still near all time lows.

33   tatupu70   2012 Jun 12, 8:50am  

Margaret Has A HorseFace says

Whatchya think about that

I think I'm wasting my time with a troll.

34   HEY YOU   2012 Jun 12, 9:59am  

Margaret Has A HorseFace @ #34,

Just read your comment about being "shocked". Being the spur of the moment & without links for backup,I can remember those that thought home prices would end in middle 1950's prices. This was around 2-3 years ago.

35   HEY YOU   2012 Jun 12, 10:59am  

Margaret Has A HorseFace,
My Bad:adjusted for inflation.
http://boingboing.net/2011/03/04/us-house-prices-fall.html

36   GraooGra   2012 Jun 12, 11:07am  

I went to the open house this weekend. Nice community built in 1995. At that time there were selling these new homes for $245k (2,700 sq ft). Prices in 2005 were at $845k and now they are at $715k. I don't think they would ever go to 1995 prices but how much you think they would sell for when that bubble bursts completly?
I think that median family income in that area is close to or a little bit over $100k.
I still cannot imagine that these houses would go down as much as to $300k - $350k.

37   tdeloco   2012 Jun 12, 2:46pm  

@Lynnetemarcene

Flood of Shadow Real Estate Inventory about to hit the market will drive prices further down.

Heard this story a couple years ago. How do we know it's gonna be for real this time?

38   lostand confused   2012 Jun 12, 8:37pm  

People are still stretching to buy a house. Job loss is still a potent threat and globalisation and free trade are accepted as the gospel truth by both parties and Presidential candidates.

Housing will have to match the new reality. I remmebr back when a million dollar home was something rare. Then the boom came and every track home in places like Dublin and San Ramon came close to a million or more. 300-400k would be the right place-all things considered.

39   GraooGra   2012 Jun 13, 3:20am  

OK people, I believe you!

However, when I come to that web site I feel like I live in an alternate reality.

I put an offer on the foreclosure a month ago. It was a "multiple bidding" situation. I said "screw it I'm not going to go crazy and outbid myself and gave up".
Today this same house sold for $140k more than I offered and $100k more than selling price !!!

Tell me why we would have such a catastrophic downturn when everybody drinks that 'cool-aid' again?

Times are so crazy right now that I really need some kind of faith to stay rational myself. Just convince me some more. I'm losing it...seriously!

We try to be rational, calculate our price range, prepare our down payment, we make sure our credit score is good, we go through the lending process. We check comps, we check the neighborhood schools, inspect houses 4 times, talk to neighbors, research, and study the market conditions and current situation. We understand laws of supply and demand, we know inflation rate, we use buy vs. rent scenarios calculator. We consider additional costs of owning, pros and cons of renting.
We tried to buy a short sale house 2 years ago. Waited with our offer for four mounts and finally learning that the bank took someone else's offer which was about $20k lower than our offer and we were better qualified buyers anyway.
Now, this one was bought by someone for $140k more. Does it even make sense? Does even any logical, mathematical law apply in that type of environment?
You try to learn, you try to prepare, you do everything you possibly can and it still doesn’t work!
There is no book, no web site, no blog, no agent, no prescription which could help you to get the house you want at the price you feel is right. I feel it is just plain and ugly luck or a lot of cash which regular person doesn't have anyway.

40   GraooGra   2012 Jun 13, 4:27am  

Call it Crazy says

GraooGra says

Today this same house sold for $140k more than I offered and $100k more than selling price !!!

Tell me why we would have such a catastrophic downturn when everybody drinks that 'cool-aid' again?

Because one house or one situation doesn't make a trend!! Take a step back and look at the BIG picture in the COMPLETE country, not just your little local area of CA!!

I know. Our neighbors and friends are telling us "don't worry. If we were to buy our own house today we wouldn't be able to afford it".
It is still something you are yearning for and start obsess about after a while, especially if it is impossible to get.

41   David9   2012 Jun 13, 5:34am  

GraooGra says

Times are so crazy right now that I really need some kind of faith to stay rational myself. Just convince me some more. I'm losing it...seriously!

I saw your comment in my email, wanted to reply, and then discovered we are neighbors along the 101 corridor.

I am just as perplexed why properties along the 101 corridor from Ventura to Los Angeles are still higher priced than even other California cities. Price certain Orange County cities, Long Beach, and San Diego and you will see for yourself.

True, and apartment is an address, but I do 'want' a small property here.

For whatever it is worth, I have looked online for 3 years, with prices slowly declining in the low end, the pitiful offererings from the banks, and have not once even come close to 'wanting' to put in an offer. For my job, I would need to stay in this area.

42   HEY YOU   2012 Jun 13, 6:52am  

Enlarge chart for excitement.
We will never drop to 110 much less 100 because house values only rise.LOL

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/07/updating-the-case-shiller-100-chart-forecast/

43   David9   2012 Jun 13, 7:10am  

HEY YOU says

Enlarge chart for excitement.
We will never drop to 110 much less 100 because house values only rise.LOL

And also for your entertainment, it wasn't long ago, Mr. Patrick was considered: "Three years ago, plenty of folks considered Patrick Killelea to be a loony tune raving about real estate Armageddon."

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/09/24/BUKCS4NNB.DTL&ao=all

44   everything   2012 Jun 13, 7:28am  

Nothing has really changed regarding the flim/flam aspect of the housing market, it's as dishonest a trade/business as ever, especially with 5-10% foreign investment coming in, on top of the investors the banks have lined up.

It's a game of capital, having connections, and having piles of money sitting around, you either got it or you don't.

45   David9   2012 Jun 13, 7:39am  

APOCALYPSEFUCK isFrank Sinatra says

This guy Lanning shit on the Poobah. Never forget.

Oh! Matt Lanning, he is 'in' the article, one of the criminal psychopaths, got it! thanks, fuck him.

46   David9   2012 Jun 13, 7:47am  

Margaret Has A HorseFace says

Sideways with a utility pole.

LOL! The scum. I don't need to know what he did, he's dog meat..

47   Danaseb   2012 Jun 13, 11:12pm  

GraooGra says

I went to the open house this weekend. Nice community built in 1995. At that time there were selling these new homes for $245k (2,700 sq ft). Prices in 2005 were at $845k and now they are at $715k. I don't think they would ever go to 1995 prices but how much you think they would sell for when that bubble bursts completly?

I think that median family income in that area is close to or a little bit over $100k.

I still cannot imagine that these houses would go down as much as to $300k - $350k.

wait or buy elsewhere, these prices do not reflect a sane market. 10 year of inflation perhaps, but now; no.

48   Goran_K   2012 Jun 14, 2:28am  

Foreclosures are starting to spike. Maybe the banks finally figured out that loan mods don't work, and letting underwater owners squat for eternity isn't a profitable business model:
http://money.cnn.com/2012/06/14/real_estate/foreclosures/index.htm?hpt=hp_t2

49   Goran_K   2012 Jun 14, 4:07am  

Yup, it's simple really. They can pretend things are good on the books by keeping the bad non-performing assets, or actually make money by foreclosing and turning them into performing assets by selling them at market value to people who can actually afford the house.

This choice would be easy for any private enterprise not receiving billions of dollars in government welfare money.

50   True Real House Sheriff   2012 Jun 14, 4:40am  

tatupu70 says

Margaret Has A HorseFace says

Whatchya think about that

I think I'm wasting my time with a troll.

Definitely juvenile trolls under the age of 12 and with the analytical skills of a slug. At least Call it Crazy backs up his/her arguments.

51   tatupu70   2012 Jun 14, 6:04am  

Call it Crazy says

I'm still waiting for Tat to back up his....

What are you looking for? I usually post links to back up my facts...

52   jaz5   2012 Jun 14, 6:09am  

whenever there is a buying mania it's a safe bet to say that there is another bubble in the making... the current buying mania is reminiscent of the heady days of 2004, it definitely does not signify normal sustainable demand.

These are investors trying to make a quick buck gambling that prices will rise OR buyers on the fence thinking they will be priced out forever if they don't act now. We have seen both groups in the bubble that elapsed and we know what happened to the market after that.

53   Goran_K   2012 Jun 14, 6:11am  

Call it Crazy, small favor if possible, but could you stop quoting tatupu70? I originally ignored him because he was turning a lot of threads into bull vs bear troll arguments, I'm not saying his points aren't valid for consideration, but I'm trying to cut down on the clutter so I can read non-emotional-troll post. But since you've been quoting him it's like the arguments are starting all over again.

I think you add a lot to the discussions here, but the petty arguments get tiresome.

54   tatupu70   2012 Jun 14, 6:33am  

Goran_K says

I'm not saying his points aren't valid for consideration, but I'm trying to cut down on the clutter so I can read non-emotional-troll post. But since you've been quoting him it's like the arguments are starting all over again.
I think you add a lot to the discussions here, but the petty arguments get tiresome.

Yes, it's much easier to read posts from only those who agree with you.

Unfortuntately, you'll find that you will be caught off guard quite frequently.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink

55   tatupu70   2012 Jun 14, 6:34am  

Call it Crazy says

Sorry, I keep telling myself to ignore him but then he states something nuts

Really? Something nuts? Could you please show me one example of anything I've said that could be possibly be interpreted as "nuts"?

56   tatupu70   2012 Jun 14, 6:43am  

Call it Crazy says

I think you're confused.. a link is what I just posted in the Reuters article above.... we haven't seen links from you, just spout-offs...

really?

Do these posts look familiar?

/?p=1213340#comment-834135

/?p=1213195#comment-832721

/?p=1213371#comment-834796

If there's something I post with no backup, just ask for a source. I'll be happy to post it.

58   Carolyn C   2012 Jun 24, 5:14pm  

I think that there are two housing markets. One for rich investors and one for the average home buyer. On many occasions I have looked at Redfin and have seen great homes sold for very low prices. But I suspect that the good deals primarily going to investors, realtors, or others that have an in on the market. The banks will except a low cash offer from and investor before excepting a higher priced offer from an average person with traditional financing. So looking back at the data may show lower priced homes but it most likely was sold to someone with cash. Meanwhile the rest of us home buyers are left competing for the high priced flipped homes. It just not fair :(

59   freak80   2012 Jun 25, 1:51am  

Carolyn C says

I think that there are two housing markets. One for rich investors and one for the average home buyer.

Rich people don't see housing as an investment. If they did, they wouldn't be rich in the first place.

If real-estate is an investment, it's one that pays negative dividends in the form of property taxes, insurance, and maintenance. Do you want an investment that pays negative dividends? I do not.

60   Carolyn C   2012 Jun 25, 2:00am  

Oh, so there are not investors buying up homes?

61   freak80   2012 Jun 25, 2:31am  

Carolyn C says

Oh, so there are not investors buying up homes?

I have no idea. Are they planning on becoming landlords? Or are they just speculating?

62   bubblesitter   2014 Jul 17, 12:48am  

If the flood ever comes it won't reach the MLS for would be buyers, they will be scooped up at auctions. You will know when listing starts popping up after being acquired by investors at the auctions.

« First        Comments 28 - 62 of 62        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste