« First « Previous Comments 165 - 185 of 185 Search these comments
....and, Patrick is back in his agenda form.
Just THREE out of 15 articles, have topics regarding real estate are posted today.
Did you really think he's going to listen to you? Who the fuck are you?
Its a PRIVATE blog site, owned by an INDIVIDUAL.
HE can post what ever the fuck kind of news he wants.
If you want news that you like, there are plenty of other sites.
Say What? I am a Capitalist Pig and love this site. This is where I discovered Max Keiser and G.I.A.B.O. Global Insurrection Against Banker Occupation. There is NOTHING about REAL capitalism that supports fraud, theft, murder and war mongering. There is nothing about REAL capitalism that ONLY TAKES and never Gives back. Read Adam Smith; "An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth Of Nations" (1776)
The productivity of free exchange, Social order based on freedom, The psychology of ethics, Self-interest and VIRTUE AND NOT only profit.
"The Wealth Of Nations" is no endorsement of economic greed, as sometimes caricatured. Self-interest may drive the economy, but that is a force for GOOD – provided there is GENUINELY OPEN COMPETITION genuinely open competition and no coercion. And it is the poor that economic and social freedom benefits most.
Capitalism is about returns to society. "Selfishness" is not MURDER and MASS DESTRUCTION. Just because Cheney wanted more bucks for his Halliburton....tens of thousands are murdered by declaring war against Iraq for OIL.
That is NOT real capitalism...that's a war crime punished by death. Now the banks have the rights of humans.
When will we EXECUTE THE FIRST BANK for the murders it proudly commits?
LET'S GO AND G.I.A.B.O. STOP THE BANKSTER OCCUPATION.....! Drive them away...and send them back to the sewer with the other rats.
I removed "Real Estate News" as the label on the home page and elsewhere. Now it's just news with an emphasis on real estate.
Anyway, the real estate and politics are all of a piece. Being interested in how we got such a bubble let me to the politics of how money corrupts our laws in DC.
And everyone in the 99%, right, left, or other dimensions, should agree that corruption of our laws is a bad thing.
Here's a clue to being civil: talk about the issue, not the persons character and leave out the inflammatory swearing, serves no purpose but to inflame.
Serpentor didn't attack LPM, he asked a question. Sure, he swore, but he actually asked Larry this same question 2 weeks ago - and Larry declined to answer. So he doubled up.
Welcome back again Larry! Didn't you swear you'd never read my site again several times now?
I'm flattered you think my super-leftist powers are capable of changing the world! If not, why keep protesting?
As Patrick pointed out in the past, this ain't your kiddie's site. Many of us have sworn, and it hasn't been a problem. I do feel bad that you are offended, but what can you expect from a guy whose icon says "GTFO?"
if you can not be civil and discuss the issues in a reasonable manner you should go elsewhere to post your irrational attacks
That's what the Outside forum is for!
Swear as much as you want there, be uncivil and irrational, and have a great time.
Thanks underwaterman! That wouldn't be too hard to do. OK, it's on my list.
Really, not an attack. Please. Stop for a moment a pretend I said this to you. Still not feel like an attack?
I still don't feel like it was a personal attack. Maybe I'm thicker skinned - having lived thru OTS, Shrek and the boys...
Do I imply a want a kiddie discussion site? Really? How do you get that from wanting a civil forum site?
In the past Patrick has said that swearing was okay because it's not a child-oriented site - hence my statement that this is not a kiddie discussion site. I would go back over the multitudes of posts to find the exact quote, but - nah.
Really? I'm not offended. I was feeling sorry for Larry that the guy was attacked so viciously for a simple remark
Again, there have been vicious attacks on this site and imho this one didn't even rate as an attack, much less a vicious one. But that's my opinion - and I don't speak for the masses.
I do feel patronized by your remark however if you want to know what I am really feeling.
I have no control over the way that you feel. I certainly didn't mean to be patronizing, and sincerely felt a twang of sorrow that you were offended. However since you say that you weren't offended, your lack of offense is duly noted.
My expression of sorrowful compassion at your perception of the statement made by serpentor is hereby rescinded.
if nobody felt attacked then what the fuck is the problem.
Fuck. IF I wanted to attack someone, there wont be no question whether not I meant it.
This is how I fucking talk. If there are rules against swearing, I will fucking stop. but since there are not, I will continue to fucking swear.
OTS
Who is OTS?
Sometimes people refer to people from back in the day. Has anyone written a "Brief History of Patrick.net"?
Some might argue that deficit spending pays for itself..Paul Krugman would come to mind. He is now saying it is like 1937 when FDR pulled back.
I don't think any Keynesians say it pays for itself, but rather that it is the most affordable and only way to grow your way out of this. They aren't in love with the idea of borrowing, not like the right is on tax cuts. Krugman wouldn't ask for borrowing in good times, but there is no situation that can't be resolved, or improved by tax cuts for the opposition.
Sometimes people in power change stances. Ted Kennedy was actually prochoice prior to roe vs wade. He had to change his mind to get reelected.
Kennedy was pro-choice after Roe too. I assume you mean that he was personally opposed to abortion as a Catholic, and later became a staunch defender of a woman's right to choose.
This is, of course, a sticky point. I think many could be personally opposed to the practice, but believe firmly that in a free society that that decision should be between a woman and her doctor.
Much as the libertarian wing of the Republicans should be, and used to be, regarding gay rights and gays in the military. While they might be opposed to the practice, they recognize the inherent right of the other in society to have their own individual compass. Goldwater said, "You don't have to be straight to shoot straight"
At least, there used to be a belief that keeping the government out of my bedroom, or my doctor's office was good for everyone. When the Right took on water with the social conservatives, they adopted their authoritarian viewpoints, and abandoned that wing.
OTS = "On the Sidelines"
someone who started posting on the site pretending he was "waiting on the sidelines to buy" It was soon exposed that he was either a realtor or someone who was underwater. He managed to antagonize pretty much everyone from our favorite Ducky to Patrick
Did I threaten him? no. Did I call him names? no. End of discussion.
I'm from the fucking Bronx, this is how we fucking talk.
Larry stuck his nose in a privately run blog site and predicted its "doom" (one can consider that a threat). I have no idea why you are defending him.
I'm from the fucking Bronx, this is how we fucking talk.
Reminds me of the 2 NYC jokes I know:
Q: How do you ask someone from NYC what time it is?
A: "Excuse me sir, can you tell me what time it is, or shall I go fuck myself?"
The Brooklyn Alphabet:
Fucking A... Fucking B... Fucking C... etc.
Sorry to derail, but I never resist the opportunity to insert a joke.
-ellie
More people, in this country, are conservative than liberal because most people understand that liberalism is a mental disorder.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnostic_and_Statistical_Manual_of_Mental_Disorders
I've searched, but can't find Liberalism. Maybe in the DMS-V, due out in 2013...
There can be strong differences between what a party says, what the local climate can be and what someone personally believes.
GHW Bush slammed Reagan calling his plans voodoo economics but then he was the vice president under him for eight years.
Gun control as an issue is largely associated with the left but might only be a selling point in local politics in Chicago and DC. In Vermont it won't get anyone anywhere (they have the most lax laws in the country).
There are various influences that are hard to ignore. The Daile's in Chicago, DuPont in Deleware, Mormons in Utah, oil in the Gulf Coast, P&G in Cinncinatti..heck the military in any town/city that hosts a base. Everything is a special interest as there is no general interest.
ahhh......politics. name calling and swearing. way to keep it civil and intelligent folks. for the record, and to the right wingers here, who seem to be terribly offended......remember, it's still a free country. leave the site, and don't come back. to the liberals who sunk to this level of "debate"....i don't understand why you get so worked up over conservative rhetoric. this nation is great because we all have the right to our beliefs and opinions. what sucks about that is that most of us have to bicker like children over those beliefs. for the record, this is patrick's site and he can run it how he'd like.....and the beauty of this nation is that if you think you can do better, then you can go run your own site. god bless all of you and have a fantastic day!!!!!
I'm from the fucking Bronx, this is how we fucking talk.
Reminds me of the 2 NYC jokes I know:
Q: How do you ask someone from NYC what time it is?
A: "Excuse me sir, can you tell me what time it is, or shall I go fuck myself?"
The Brooklyn Alphabet:
Fucking A... Fucking B... Fucking C... etc.
Sorry to derail, but I never resist the opportunity to insert a joke.
I love a good joke too, so here's another on the same topic. Hopefully it can defuse all the political foodfighting going on, too.
How do you perform CPR in New York City?
"Get up! Get up! You want to fucking DIE?"
I love this thread.
folks left and right need to come to this site ready to admit that the folks f*cking them don't really give a shit about their politics. just keep paying and keep arguing.
debt is slavery. and the folks helping to put you there don't give a shit who you vote for or what news channel you watch.
« First « Previous Comments 165 - 185 of 185 Search these comments
I've been a fan of patrick.net, since 2006 or 2007? The early days.
I have seen a tragic downturn in the quantity, and quality of real estate postings over the past few months.
Every day, it's 70-80% of left leaning, political rhetoric.
If Patrick doesn't mend his ways, this site will not remain a haven for real estate watchers, and will pass away.
Cheers,
Larry
#housing