« First « Previous Comments 5 - 19 of 19 Search these comments
I have no idea, but with their current dividend yield there is no real reason to sell it.
If Intel can manage to overcome the hurdles of bringing their chips to smartphones, they'll do extremely well in the coming decade.
There are a few big risks:
1. They never achieve the price/performance/efficiency range that is BETTER THAN the leading ARM vendors (Samsung, TI, NVIDIA)
...
My gut feeling is that intel will not be in the consumer CPU business 20 years from now, and will instead focus on server chips, and other semiconductors.This could still mean that they do well, of course. As more and more processing moves server side, intel will thrive.
Good stuff.
Intel has a deep moat on server market.
I luv'd the Opteron so much I bought AMD stocks in 2006.
Eventually, Intel regained the ground lost and I lost some AMD$.
Keeping in mind that I don't know what the hell I'm doing other than being reasonably intelligent and somewhat analytical...
That's 2 skills better than me. :)
Thanks all!
Doing design and manufacturing in house gives them an advantage over people relying on ARM for design expertise.
Kevin, nice analysis of the various risk factors. I was just reading that Intel will be going to FinFETs in their next process technology jump, a couple (or several) years before everyone else. At the very least, they can put up a strong fight on the server side, and maybe make inroads in tablets. I think Microsoft and Windows 8 is the wildcard. My tendency is to say that MS is hosed as they're in unenviable position of trying to make their bloatware more efficient for mobile platforms. That said, they tend not to get it right the first time (CE, Zune), but if they keep at it they end up with a product that wins share (NT server). I'll certainly be impressed if WinTel can ever thrive in the mobile space as they're roadkill at this point...
If I 'm being completely honest, since I'd never personally buy an Intel processor, I'd have trouble owning their stock.
Doing design and manufacturing in house gives them an advantage over people relying on ARM for design expertise.
Kevin, nice analysis of the various risk factors. I was just reading that Intel will be going to FinFETs in their next process technology jump, a couple (or several) years before everyone else. At the very least, they can put up a strong fight on the server side, and maybe make inroads in tablets. I think Microsoft and Windows 8 is the wildcard. My tendency is to say that MS is hosed as they're in unenviable position of trying to make their bloatware more efficient for mobile platforms. That said, they tend not to get it right the first time (CE, Zune), but if they keep at it they end up with a product that wins share (NT server). I'll certainly be impressed if WinTel can ever thrive in the mobile space as they're roadkill at this point...
Microsoft has had three products that were really successful after trying and trying and trying. The meme that "they succeed eventually" has been true three times out of dozens in their 30-odd year history.
Also, Microsoft is supporting ARM in windows 8 anyway, so they don't seem to confident in Intel anymore either.
Hope everything worked out for you. With respect to INTC, the stock broke out above its resistance of about $23.50, so that should be your support now. However, the stock is short-term over-bought and is in the upper range of the bollinger band so a consolidation of about $1.00 to $1.50 or so is likely coming.
However, the whole market is over-bought at this time. I raised some cash by selling some oil stocks this past Friday. Currently waiting for another entry point.
Best of luck. :)
I also agree with this.
I think the best analysis of why intel will fail at entering the arm/cell phone market is that they're intel. No one wants to deal with them, unless they have to. They're there right now because there is no alternative. Even they couldn't convince people to give the itanium a shot. People want x86, and they don't want anything else.
If we do get to a point where people want something else (like tablets, cell phones, etc) they won't choose intel, because they're intel. It's not worth the headaches and legal battles to do business with them.
My gut feeling is that intel will not be in the consumer CPU business 20 years from now, and will instead focus on server chips, and other semiconductors.
This could still mean that they do well, of course. As more and more processing moves server side, intel will thrive.
If the Handset is considered the Client where prices will continue to drop and IT infrust. being the Server which provide the backbone of all handset services, I think Intel will do very well focusing on Server side which the bigger telecom clients will continue to use.
At the end, while you may not visably see it.. Its still Powered by Intel.
You have to look at the financials, both Yahoo and Google have those, it's public information. Does the stock price match the reality?
This hyena is getting a little tired. If I'm a trader ( I 'm not), this could be a good time to take profit.
kt1652 says
There are some really bullish short term signs for intc.

That's what you get with bad results.
They should try selling processors, like, faster than 2 years ago.
« First « Previous Comments 5 - 19 of 19 Search these comments
I bought Intel back at the beginning of this depression at about $15/share. It's up over $26 today, which looks like about the top of what it's been.
Time to sell? I know some of you don't like reinvesting dividends, but I did and it's added up too.
Thanks!