« First « Previous Comments 108 - 114 of 114 Search these comments
Also, I have always said, “There is Really NO such thing as a Buyer’s Agentâ€. Why? Because Buyers Agents are paid a percentage of the sales price and the higher the sales price, the more money the Buyer’s Agent makes. The Buyer’s Agent will Always pretend like they are there to protect the Buyer, they will point out obvious flaws with the properties that anyone with ½ a brain can read in the remarks or see for themselves to try to gain the Buyers confidence. Once they know they have the buyer’s confidence, they will not be completely honest on how low the property should sell for. They will always opt to push for the higher sales price.
I’ve had several RE Agents get angry with me when I told them how much I want to bid and some have basically told me, “Well if the sellers would sell that low, I would snatch it up for that price and flip the property for a profit.†A few times I saw the properties I asked the Agents to submit a bid for sell for less than what I tried to get the real estate agent to write the contract for. Later I found out Real Estate Agents bought the properties for themselves and they did flip the properties for their own profits.
If “Buyers Agents†really existed the system would work something like this: Based on ACCURATE CMA’s, the Buyers Agent will get .5% in addition to his 3% commission for every 5% Below the CMA the property sells for. If the property sells for 5% more than the CMA value, the Buyer’s Agents gets .5% deducted from his commission.
Just because you've attended 4 years of college 3 years of law school and passed the bar to call yourself an attorney does not make you someone I'd hire to handle even a simple matter. Just as I would not go to LegalZoom and attempt to handle the matter on my own without training. 90% of flying a plane is like driving a bus, the pilots are paid the big bucks for their experience, training and ability for the 10% of the time a higher skill set is needed. So to, most jackasses can do 90% of the REALTORS job, it's the 10% do it yourselfers will never be able to do that represent their biggest value to the transaction. Chances are you will never need a seat belt or an air bag, try to buy a new car without one. It's only the day you need them that you appreciate them being part of the auto.
I agree with EconPete's main post.
Also, I have always said, “There is Really NO such thing as a Buyer’s Agentâ€. Why? Because Buyers Agents are paid a percentage of the sales price and the higher the sales price, the more money the Buyer’s Agent makes. The Buyer’s Agent will Always pretend like they are there to protect the Buyer, they will point out obvious flaws with the properties that anyone with ½ a brain can read in the remarks or see for themselves to try to gain the Buyers confidence. Once they know they have the buyer’s confidence, they will not be completely honest on how low the property should sell for. They will always opt to push for the higher sales price.
Years ago I’ve had several RE Agents get angry with me when I told them how much I want to bid and some have basically told me, “Well if the sellers would sell that low, I would snatch it up for that price and flip the property for a profit.†A few times I saw the properties I asked the Agents to submit a bid for sell for less than what I tried to get the real estate agent to write the contract for. Later I found out Real Estate Agents bought the properties for themselves and they did flip the properties for their own profits.
If “Buyers Agents†really existed the system would work something like this: Based on ACCURATE CMA’s, the Buyers Agent will get .5% in addition to his 3% commission for every 5% Below the CMA value the property sells for. If the property sells for 5% more than the CMA value, the Buyer’s Agents gets .5% deducted from his commission.
RE: What it takes to get a real estate license....as a consumer who would hire a REALTOR you probably want someone who treats their profession as a career and not a part time hobby.
Exactly.
That's why we hired a real-estate lawyer with a three-year JD graduate degree to look after our legal interests on two out of the last three properties we sold (we used a company provided Realtor(TM) for the third because that way my relocation package covered all the transaction costs including commissions plus a gross-up to cover income taxes on that benefit versus nothing for any other home sale method).
A REALTOR® is defined as
A real estate agent is a REALTOR® when he or she is a member of the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®, The Voice for Real Estate® -- the world's largest professional association.
http://www.realtor.com/Basics/AllAbout/Realtors/WhatIs.asp?source=web
A REALTOR® doesn't fight for anything. They just pay their tithe to the NAR(R), which allows them to claim superiority over all of the non-members. They also agree to uphold a code of ethics, but that seems to be a sham.
The NAR® is a typical trade group that charges membership fees, lobbies for laws that benefit the industry at the expense of others, spends millions on adverts, hires an 'economist' to give official economic prognostications that benefit the industry, and gives car rental discounts at Hertz.
Everyone knows that. We need an encore. How about encouraging them to sky dive without a parachute. Geronimo!
As a counterpoint to all this animosity towards real estate agents....
After 9+ years, we're buying again. While I think there is a good slide in prices to come, we simply waited thru enough of the zaniness and back on the other side now. We have good income and FICO...we have been quite purposefully renting and are now on our 3rd house. The current owner of this house is getting re-married and will move back here - so our choices were to look for another rental (rents up about 10% the past couple years here in San Fran area) or buy.
We judged the least of our pain to be buying right now (we had a HORRIBLE landlord for the first 5 of those rental years). Tho prices haven't dropped quite as much as hoped (maybe 20% around here from peak), but the 3% mortgage rates today are simply helping the monthly nut a lot.
Anyhow, we had some complex last contingencies to drop before the house transaction moves forward (based on appraisal, pest and home inspection done last week). Our agent, a totally buttoned up lady down the street, has been available via email and phone every single day for a week to discuss these issues and sort them thru. She set up the Pest and Home Inspectors - and they were both total pros. She set us up with an insurance agent - and that ins agent beat the pasts off AAA and GEICO (both of whom I contacted) in price for homeowners.
Further, both last nite and the nite before we had thorny issues to overcome with the sellers and we had conversations about it at 10PM.
Truly, this lady gets the bronze start for efforts and is earning every bit of the 1.5-2.0% she gets from this transaction from the sellers (no agent makes 3%; that's generally shared with the agency). She's every bit as good as she advertised herself to be to us.
« First « Previous Comments 108 - 114 of 114 Search these comments
If competition could be restored to the home buying process, transaction costs could be greatly reduced which would connect more buyers and sellers with deals. This claim to 6% ownership of all real-estate causes the market to be sticky, fewer transactions occur as a result. More sales would occur if there wasn’t a 6% barrier between the seller and the buyer, and the purchase price would be lower for the buyer as well.
The housing market would recover faster if home deals could omit this expensive middle man. People should not revert to realty offices when thinking of buying or selling homes. Individuals need to default to internet sites like Zillow.com or other housing sites in order to reduce the market collusion from realtors. The internet is a great device for competition! Now people need to realize that websites can be used to organize home buyers and sellers just like Amazon, Craigslist, or Ebay, without the expensive middleman.
Many people argue that buyers do not pay the fees to the realtor so they should not care if the realtor gets paid. Well due to the fungibility of money, the buyer could have bought the house for 94% of what they paid because that is what the seller was willing to accept for the house. This makes it obvious to see that the seller nominally pays for the realtor fees, but the buyer, in real terms, pays about 6% too much for the home. Not realizing that a realtor’s 6% could be negotiated is a flaw that must not be overlooked.
#housing