« First « Previous Comments 7 - 7 of 7 Search these comments
When we're in a country that the best PUBLIC schools in the nation are in the rich neighborhoods. Then I suspect in 20 years we'll have a lot of domestic black workers working in the homes of those privileged few, that got a "Good" education. On the public's dime, including the parent's dime of the domestic help. It's a sick liberal whirld aint it?
I guess it was only wrong when White southern guys did it 50 years ago.
But it's OK for the Liberal elite to establish class inequality.
Oh but they say it's the head honcho at the bank's fault. The 1% and not the 50%.
They sure like to pass judgement on everyone else from behind the safety of their gated community don't they?
The reason wealthy districts are permitted to outspend poorer ones within the same state is because of a supreme court case from 1973, San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez. This has nothing to do with liberal vs. conservative. All states do this, regardless of the voting blocks involved. However, IMHO, it was a terrible decision that condemned a large number of our countries children to inadequate educational opportunities, and the deciding vote was cast by a Justice appointed by Nixon, who wasn't exactly one of your much maligned liberals.
« First « Previous Comments 7 - 7 of 7 Search these comments
http://www.neighborhoodscout.com/neighborhoods/school-district/ratings/top100/
I don't see Cupertino here and most schools are in New England/NY belt. Doesn't seem right?
Any comments anyone?
The reason I put it in RE forum is that most people believe that there is a correlation between school districts' performance and housing prices.
#housing