patrick.net

back on topic:

leoj707 says

Wow, all their food at one restaurant sold out?

People in Fairfield must really hate gay marriage.

Sold out like so many other stores...So much for talk about any boycott... wont work!

During the 2008 presidential debate hosted by Pastor Rick Warren,
President Obama explained:

"I believe that marriage is the union between a man and a woman. Now, for me as a Christian -- for me -- for me as a Christian, it is also a sacred union. God's in the mix.
I am not somebody who promotes same-sex marriage."

oBaMa had the SAME opinion of what constitutes marriage that Don Cathy still has...until a month or so ago.

WHERE WAS THE OUTRAGE AGAINST hUSSAIn WHEN HE HAD THE SAME OPINION OF WHAT CONSTITUTED MARRIAGE ??

Why the double standard??? Is that something libs can't live without?

Damn, you guys are good. You caught a politician trying to maneuver through the gay marriage debate. You got him but good!

Now, about those ill-planned wars, Medicare Part D, and Tax cuts that weren't paid for. Do you have priorities? Is your faux outrage limited to Democrats?

Honest Abe says

oBaMa had the SAME opinion of what constitutes marriage that Don Cathy still has...until a month or so ago.

Obama is a politician. He does what he thinks the public will like.

In the 1960s, LBJ saw that his party would become marginalize unless they stopped being racist and embraced the civil rights movement. LBJ's support of civil rights was a calculated political move, not a moral awakening.

Obama is just like LBJ. He realizes that the party that opposes gay marriage will be marginalized because the public increasingly wants it. More importantly, the young want it and as they grow older gay marriage will be universally supported just as interracial marriage is today.

CL - I'm 100% with you on the never-ending, ill planned wars, empire building and an outrageous, bloated military budget. We don't "need" military bases all around the world to be "safe".

Next we should do away with the unpatriotic Patriot Act. Then we reduce spending across the board down to where spending was in the year 2,000.

Then we reduce taxes across the board to (1) allow the wealthy to spend freely and foolishly , invest freely, and die freely. Let their spendthrift kids inherit all the money and then blow it in two or three years. That will juice up the economy. And (2) to allow the middle class to keep more of the money they earned so they can spend it the way they want - NOT let the government confiscate it from them to waste and squander it.

My outrage knows no bounds...included are democrats, RINO's, political hacks and spendthrifts, left leaning progressives, closet communists, closet socialists, republicans who run up the national debt, war mongers, lawyers, radical gay aggitators, union bosses and thugs, Chicago politicians, the fruits and nuts in San Francisco, Jerry Brown, Dirty Harry, B.J. Clinton, the radical wealth spreader without a birth certificate and a socialized security number that does not match his age, Rosenvelt, LBJ, Helicopter Ben, Tim "the tax cheat", Lawless Eric Holder. Don't get me started, I could go for probably longer than the brown-shirts who are recording my every word.

Dan8267 says

Honest Abe says

oBaMa had the SAME opinion of what constitutes marriage that Don Cathy still has...until a month or so ago.

Obama is a politician. He does what he thinks the public will like.

In the 1960s, LBJ saw that his party would become marginalize unless they stopped being racist and embraced the civil rights movement. LBJ's support of civil rights was a calculated political move, not a moral awakening.

Obama is just like LBJ. He realizes that the party that opposes gay marriage will be marginalized because the public increasingly wants it. More importantly, the young want it and as they grow older gay marriage will be universally supported just as interracial marriage is today.

I think a bit differently on this. I think LBJ knew that Civil Rights would be a political loser in the short run, but that history bends towards justice. The politics involved were about who you'd make bedfellows with (no pun intended). The Republicans can have the racists, and we'll take the blacks and minorities. And those who care about Social Justice.

Obama likely leaned towards gay rights when he told the Xtians he didn't. It is difficult, after all, to get elected when you're honest while dealing with self-righteous assholes. Keep in mind, that he had to pass (and still tries) the religiosity litmus test that was being fervently applied to him in the General. It's hard when you're a Kenyan-Arab-Socialist with a radical Christian Marine preacher who dares to be Theologically accurate.

Honest Abe says

CL - I'm 100% with you on the....

Then prioritize, my friend. It's not remotely accurate to equate Obama's failures with Bush's assault on American ideals and Civil Liberties.

CL says

I think LBJ knew that Civil Rights would be a political loser in the short run, but that history bends towards justice.

I'm not so sure about history bending towards justice, although I would like to believe that. History has over the past 300 years (since the Enlightenment) slowly bent that way, but who knows if that will continue. I do think that technological and scientific advancements tend to promote social justice and that would make societies more just as time goes on.

I agree that LBJ knew backing the Civil Rights would entail a short-term drop in support and he was willing to accept that. However, I don't consider that to be a noble sacrifice but rather a shrewd political calculation.

CL says

It's not remotely accurate to equate Obama's failures with Bush's assault on American ideals and Civil Liberties.

It's certainly not remotely accurate to equate Obama's economic failures with Bush's assault on American ideals and civil liberties as well as human rights.

However, Obama has certainly continued Bush's assault on American ideas, civil liberties, and human rights. Obama has even continued the path that Bush blazed in exactly the same way Bush would have. Obama's drone strikes on innocent civilians including children is the latest example.

I think that arrogent comment " you didn't build that, someone else made that happen" is going to define the mentality and "type cast" him, just as did "I never has sex with that women" or "read my lips, no new taxes".

CL says

Honest Abe says

CL - I'm 100% with you on the....

Then prioritize, my friend. It's not remotely accurate to equate Obama's failures with Bush's assault on American ideals and Civil Liberties.

What is there to prioritize. Although I agree with you in regards to the importance of the issues you listed, HonesAbe was simply following the topic that was at discussion...
Also, why do people continue to compare Bush to Obama? I think most people (even repubs) here would argue that Bush was an idiot, but I find that many liberals always turn back to this statement.."well bush was worse than obama." This really is a non argument. Bad is bad Bush was bad... so is Obama.

Meccos says

What is there to prioritize?

Prioritize the issues that matter, not some stupid misquote or some gay-bashing Chicken choker.

But when people are led around by the nose by some "divide and distract" GOP talking points, it does the entire country a disservice.

If Obama has been ineffective, why? I believe any ineffectiveness has been a result of GOP obstructionism. Voters are free to believe that he is in the pocket of big business (the only other logical conclusion).

But, this type of dialogue is all heat and no light. Folks need to focus-- The GOP would love it if you would not.