« First « Previous Comments 37 - 43 of 43 Search these comments
But CL, you go ahead and invest into enterprise that without subsidies would fail the next minute.
I believe, but tell me if I'm wrong, that GE's business is still huge...making turbines, jet engines, telephones, appliances, security systems, healthcare, and so on.
Their vulnerability came from GE Capital. Then again, most of the big manufacturers got involved in finance. That doesn't mean that their industry is on life-support (and even if it were, GE makes that too!).
AS GE goes, goes the nation is still largely true.
Large corporate entities usually can't just sit on cash and have an investment unit in order to maximize return to their shareholders. So all that cash "on the sidelines" will likely flow into stock markets if it's not there already.
Large corporate entities usually can't just sit on cash and have an investment unit in order to maximize return to their shareholders. So all that cash "on the sidelines" will likely flow into stock markets if it's not there already.
Hey FW,
What do you mean?
Hey FW,
What do you mean?
Large corporations don't typically allow cash to sit in the bank with no returns. So they invest a large portion of their revenue into the stock markets. Investment in the stock market generates return to shareholders (a lot more than cash in the bank). Plus they can avoid paying some taxes this way.
A quick example is that MSFT is a major shareholder of AAPL. There are millions of other examples.
Per the 10-K, MSFT has about 82B in cash and investment, about 8B is in common and preferred shares.
Most goes to fixed return instructment in government bonds and corporate bonds.
Having the benefit of reading 1000's of the 10-K, most public company stash their cash in fixed income (mostly a basket of short/medium/long government/corporate bonds), not equity. If they do stash it in equity, it is either strategic or represents a minor portion of the treasury.
Most goes to fixed return instructment in government bonds and corporate bonds.
That makes sense. Liquidity and less volatility.
Companies would want to get out of these instruments quickly if they are going for strategic acquisitions.
Most goes to fixed return instructment in government bonds and corporate bonds.
That makes sense. Liquidity and less volatility.
Companies would want to get out of these instruments quickly if they are going for strategic acquisitions.
They also often invest and insure their investment. So it gets messy, but makes good returns for shareholders.
« First « Previous Comments 37 - 43 of 43 Search these comments
Anything that looks good?