by kentm follow (0)
Comments 1 - 3 of 10 Next » Last » Search these comments
Think of it a "Recall" election.
Since Democrats always seem to lose those too.
Would be interesting to see data from 2004, 2000, 1996, etc for these precincts showing anamolies. We should see the same trends by precincts if this can be explained in a manner other than fraud.
If these trends did not exist in 2004, but they do in 2008, for example, then there is clear fraud.
2004 in ohio was very strange. Weird result followed by disappearing logs.
http://www.harpers.org/archive/2005/08/0080696
(note to rw dimbulbs: that's right, ignore the facts, it's just whiny liberals getting ready to lose)
Not to mention that the vote count was unusually far off from exit polls.
(IEM had Kerry over 90% chance of winning - brifly - based on exit polls)
I hope the rethuglicans have better control of the people doing exit polls this time, if they are going to try to pull another 2004 in Ohio.
The truth is I'm hopeful, but the fact that the election is close does make it more stealable, and yes, dimbulbs, thank your lucky stars that there are scumbags on your side that are willing to cheat to prevent the scary socialist from having another term.
Comments 1 - 3 of 10 Next » Last » Search these comments
http://www.themoneyparty.org/main/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/2008_2012_ElectionsResultsAnomaliesAndAnalysis_V1.51.pdf
"...the greatest case of election fraud ever to occur in US history. It is relatively simple to see that a large number of votes are being exchanged (flipped) for the benefit of Republican candidates McCain and Romney and in all cases never the reverse." (themoneyparty.org)
#politics