▲
0
0
▼

Patrick, you're leaking SQL statements


               
2012 Oct 26, 9:34am   5,705 views  23 comments

by Dan8267   follow (4)  

@Patrick

Today the site started sending back the SQL the server is executing after posting replies to messages. Here's a snippet. Looks like your log file.

1 0.56290626525879 select self_ID, friend from relationships where other_ID = '8267'
2 0.59986114501953 select other_ID, friend, ignorr from relationships where self_ID = '8267'
3 0.86808204650879 insert into postviews (user_ID, post_ID, want_email) values (8267, 1217988, 0) on duplicate key update want_email=0
4 0.94485282897949 update comments set comment_date=now() where comment_ID=889784
5 0.97990036010742 update threads set latest_comment_excerpt='Dan8267 says CaptainShuddup says And I\'m sure there\'s sound scientific reasoning behind... \"There\'s also been studies showing that religious tendencies are genetic.\" If I bother to do the Google search and prove you wrong yet again, will you be man enough to' where post_ID=1217988

« First        Comments 20 - 23 of 23        Search these comments

20   Dan8267   @   2012 Oct 28, 5:52am  


The 6 + 3 test seems simple enough to do and reasonably hard to get around, especially if I generate it as an image.

That's just a captcha. If spammers are crowsourcing captchas on porn sites, then the 6 + 3 test is no harder (no pun intended) to break.

21   Melissa   @   2012 Oct 28, 8:34am  

Dan8267 says

That's just a captcha.

But if it's a custom built "captcha," the spammers would have to customize code to deal with it. It's not a canned captcha for which they already have libraries to handle. I doubt Patrick has the following (sorry) to get spammers attention.

And it doesn't even have to be an image. It could be text. How would they know which field is the test? Registration asks lots of things. One could even be "leave this blank if you are a human."

22   Patrick   @   2012 Oct 28, 10:56am  

Melissa says

I doubt Patrick has the following (sorry) to get spammers attention.

Actually, they are paying close attention, and continuously modify their spam to try to get it through my filters.

For example, I added a feature where you can enter an email address so that the thread will get mailed to that address (and the address added as a user). Within one day they were entering valid email addresses, which then got registered as users. Then they would log in as those users and attempt to post spam.

So I'm pretty sure the spamming is not entirely automated. There must be humans working on it.

« First        Comments 20 - 23 of 23        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste