Comments 1 - 5 of 5 Search these comments
Should atheist elect themselves a Pope or God or someone with some other title and do whatever sacrifice is demanded of them to keep the movement alive for the long run?
Once you start organizing religion, it becomes all about control and money. Atheism is best served as it is; a quiet belief that isn't pushed onto others.
Once you start organizing religion, it becomes all about control and money. Atheism is best served as it is; a quiet belief that isn't pushed onto others.
Case in point, "Atheism+"
Should atheist elect themselves a Pope or God or someone with some other title and do whatever sacrifice is demanded of them to keep the movement alive for the long run?
Once you start organizing religion, it becomes all about control and money. Atheism is best served as it is; a quiet belief that isn't pushed onto others.
Rather short sighted my friend and you forget your duty to those you care about.
I see that you have not quite understood what Mr. Haigt is speaking of.
In a nutshell, he is saying that if the atheist movement does not organize and give that organized body sanctity through sacrifice of some kind, it will not last long and die out.
You have escaped the fantasy world sold by religions and I congratulate you for that but you have forgotten your social conscience and duty to your children and grandchildren.
It is the sacrifice that somehow activates the longevity. I think it may be somehow tied with respect and willingness to perpetuate the sanctity of the movement. We seem to not put much value in what we do not pay for. Something like if you have to work hard to woe a conquest or having one fall into your lap in a happenstance way. They are both good but the one you sacrificed the time and effort to was much more rewarding. Remember?
The thing is though that if your type of guy and your group dies out in the time frame shown, you leave your children and grandchildren at the mercy of a stronger right wing. Do you want them to be able to do as they please with them?
Do you have girls ------
http://www.funnyordie.com...-******
or boys?
http://www.youtube.com/embed/d5YrB7TpT1Y
Regards
DL
Once you start organizing religion, it becomes all about control and money. Atheism is best served as it is; a quiet belief that isn't pushed onto others.
Case in point, "Atheism+"
Please read above and recognize that atheism does not have to be pushed onto anyone.
When people recognize that it is better to be a thinking person instead of a sheep, they will naturally gravitate to it.
But they need a place to exercise the hivish nature that they have spoken of in the O P.
It makes them feel god to have a place to go and without it, the science says atheism will not last long as a group.
Regards
DL
Atheist Church of the evolving Human God.
Atheist friends, should you elect a God and sacrifice to him or her?
By doing so, you would be acknowledging that mankind is the greatest force in the universe by symbolically taking the name of Human God and insuring that there is always a church that preaches the truth of what is known as a certainty of the supernatural God. That he probably does not exist and is a man-made mythical ideal perpetuated by the Noble Lie.
http://www.youtube.com/embed/T64_El2s7FU
If you believe what the research indicates in terms of hive behavior, then you might wonder as I do if it would not be in the best interest of the atheist movement to elect an atheist God and sacrifice to him or her?
This, if the research is true, would insure the longevity and cohesion of the atheist movement and give it power.
You may have some suggestion for the title that you would put on your leader and church. I do not except for my choice in the title above. Not being a full atheist, I would not have a vote on it; even as I support atheists and non-supernatural spirituality in people over supernatural religious notions and beliefs. I would also suggest a mantra for this church; that being, --- Faith without Facts is for Fools.
I believe in a strongly assertive type of atheism that preaches that truth is the highest principle. This preaching should be done with eloquence and good form and language; recognizing the trap of logical fallacies and the impossibility of atheists proving that there is no creator God; as well as the impossibility of believers to prove that there is a creator God.
Unfortunately I cannot call myself an atheist anymore because of having suffered an apotheosis. As an esoteric ecumenist and Gnostic Christian, you will know that I think that creating an atheist church should be the next evolutionary step for the atheist movement. I believe the research shown above to be true and fear that without a church, atheism will not be affective and perhaps die out without it.
Creating an atheist church would be the ideal for both religionists and atheists. It would insure that atheists are always here to correct the imaginary thinking of those who believe in a mythical supernatural God. This would be a benevolent and altruistic expression of atheist’s social conscience and desire to bring all people to sane thinking. This atheist church would recognize the human attribute shown in the following clip and gently try to help those adults whose thinking is hampered by it.
http://www.youtube.com/embed/vm971ltF44A&feature=related
Atheists seem to already want to do more for society towards this end as they seem to be over-represented in religious forums even as statistics say that the atheist in the U. S. and Canada are only at about 5% of the population. This is a sacrifice for atheists that already adds some cohesion and longevity to the organization and appeases the hive nature that we seem to have. But I do not think it is enough based on the research shown above.
Should atheist elect themselves a Pope or God or someone with some other title and do whatever sacrifice is demanded of them to keep the movement alive for the long run?
Regards
DL