« First « Previous Comments 217 - 256 of 376 Next » Last » Search these comments
Why don't you put a statics for heart disease deaths, aids, lost of limbs!
Suicides, just keep going with the FALSE Equivalences.
Keep up your memeberships with the NRA!
How about food related deaths! from salmonella.
Mad Cow disease
Ovarian Cancer
Breast Cancer
There is no comparison to gun MURDERS!
How about the statistics of domestic violence on woman with guns, 12x more likely to be murdered.
Wait, the chart is for accidents. Does it include intentional deaths and illnesses?
I am surprised so many people are poisoned. Accidentally I presume?
Yea, accidentally, by their wives!!!
LOL! Now I need to stop my wife from being inspired.
Why do some people think that intention matters (murder vs accident) yet they think the tools should be banned?
Car accidents and Gun Murders are not equivalent, your creating a starwman
Great, you're finally learning!!!! Cars kill way more people then guns.
Way more people own cars and use them way more than GUNS.
Your a fool.
why not include colds, flu and sneezes, it fits your data model.
did you guys get an education?
That's been my whole point. If the true intention is there to harm someone, it doesn't matter what the "tool" is... they will inflict carnage with what ever they can get. Sure, a gun is a easy "tool" for that chore, but so is many other items like I posted in the past.
its far easier to do harm with a Gun, BECAUSE it's designed to KILL!!
A car is not designed to KILL. A car is designed to get your from a to b. They are also used much more often.
by your own moronic rationale you should ban condoms, they kill billions of children!
by your own moronic rationale you should ban condoms, they kill billions of children!
Personhood begins at birth or incorporation. Condoms do not kill. I support the right to abortion.
Your a fool.
you're = you are; your = possessive;
like: your idea is that you're for a ban on guns. [I'm not usually the grammarian but you've used the wrong one like 20 times in a row!]
I expected him to say "your a looser." It would have been even funnier.
I see that you've moved beyond rhetoric and onto some stats call it crazy. Good on you. Those stats of 11K homicides versus 990K self defense instances is impressive. I wonder how many of those self defense instances were a matter of life and death. It would be hard to measure.
Meanwhile, in 2009 in the US according to Wiki, there were 75K gunshot injuries in the US. Of these, 52K were deliberate & 23K were accidents. There were 31K deaths by firearm in 2007, of which 17K were suicides and 12K were not. This 31K deaths is about the same as the number of people killed with cars.
You have stated that people would just use another tool if they didn't have access to guns. I think that some would, and some would not. First there is the desire to kill, and then there is coming up with a plan and going through with it. Guns make the second part easier. I don't think that there are any easy answers regarding legislation, but we should at least recognize that there is a problem, and that guns are part of it.
I don't think that there are any easy answers regarding legislation, but we should at least recognize that there is a problem, and that guns are part of it.
Maybe. But it is far more important to recognize that people is *the* main problem.
how many people died of a cold, a hang naill, in sky diving accident, these stats do not add anything to this conversation, they detract.
did you guys goto school, what relationship to murders with guns do cars have?
Murder is a legal concept. In the physical world, death is death.
Then murder requires mens rea, which is related only to the mind. Guns and cars both kill. The difference is in the mind of the perpetrator.
None. The is no correlation between car deaths and gun deaths.
The majority of Gun deaths involve murder !
The majority of Car deaths are ACCIDENTS!!
the topic of discussion is what again you TROLLS?
I going to start making abrasive,derogatory, & insulting comments to see how many dumbass troll responders will comment.
OH WAIT! I've already started. LOL
Peter P says
In the physical world, death is death.
lmfao, you make nonsensical arguments like a baby
Clearly an accident under law is defined much differently than murder
you can continue playing the fool.
Clearly an accident under law is defined much differently than murder
So it is a people-problem and not a guns-problem. Then the remedies should center around people and not banning guns.
Gee, I didn't realize a dead body caused by a car accident is different then dead body caused by a firearm... Thanks for helping us see there are different types of dead!!
Call it Crazy -You would think you could figure it out after you posted 100 posts of bullshit car accident stats
One death is Murder and the other is an accident.
Do you have two brain cells to figure this out yet?
APOCALYPSEFUCK is Shostakovich says
Peter P says
Self-driving cars can save many lives.
Maybe we need self driving guns, you fool.
Your a fool.
you're = you are; your = possessive;
like: your idea is that you're for a ban on guns. [I'm not usually the grammarian but you've used the wrong one like 20 times in a row!]
Wow, a spelling flame. So classy.
Way more people own cars and use them way more than GUNS.
Your a fool.
Try this:
......"As of 2009, the United States has a population of 307 million people.[5]"
....."According to the US Bureau of Transportation Statistics for 2009 there are 254,212,610 registered passenger vehicles."
....."Based on production data from firearm manufacturers,[6] there are roughly 300 million firearms owned by civilians in the United States as of 2010. Of these, about 100 million are handguns.[7]"
Now, back to my chart:
*
I suspect that his initial point is still accurate - that more people do own cars than guns and that they do use the cars more often.
Clearly an accident under law is defined much differently than murder
So it is a people-problem and not a guns-problem. Then the remedies should center around people and not banning guns.
Why is it an either-or situation? I'd say both are clearly problems.
Why is it an either-or situation? I'd say both are clearly problems.
No it's not... a gun doesn't go off by itself when sitting in a box in the closet.
It takes a person to get the ball rolling.... that's the source of the problem!
And that person's actions are facilitated by the ease with which he or she can access weapons that I suspect a great many people on this planet think have no business being kept in say the home of a primary school teacher with a disturbed child or in many other places around the country come to that.
As far as the inanimate objects (guns, cars) are concerned, murders are really the same as accidents. The differences are only in the mind states of those responsible.
There were 32,367 motor vehicle deaths last year. That is approx. 89 PER DAY!!!
Where is your outrage over cars, or are these deaths not as important because they weren't caused by a gun?
Yours is a pointless argument. People do not usually step into a car with the intention of killing someone. How many deaths were caused by someone trying to deliberately kill another person with their vehicle?
As far as the inanimate objects (guns, cars) are concerned, murders are really the same as accidents. The differences are only in the mind states of those responsible.
They are very different and that is reflected in law.
Yours is a pointless argument. People do not usually step into a car with the intention of killing someone. How many deaths were caused by someone trying to deliberately kill another person with their vehicle?
Intention is in the mind only. So it concerns only people.
The ONLY thing that separates accidents and murders (or various degrees of negligence) is the state of mind.
They are very different and that is reflected in law.
Yes. And such law involves mens rea. There are gun accidents and car murders too. And the law deals with them as appropriate.
Yours is a pointless argument. People do not usually step into a car with the intention of killing someone. How many deaths were caused by someone trying to deliberately kill another person with their vehicle?
Intention is in the mind only. So it concerns only people.
If that intention is made real by the ease with which a person can access weapons such as assault rifles, then that is a very real issue of appropriateness of ownership no matter how much you want to make it about people rather than the guns.
Well, at least you're finally admitting that a PERSON was responsible for the killing and NOT the "object" or "tool".
We're making progress....
Oh, BTW, many people have gotten into a vehicle with the intention to kill with it.
And many more have picked up a gun... What is your point? Of course a person is responsible for pulling the trigger, but society is responsible for making it easy for that person to have the gun in the first place. Why should people, seemingly with few restrictions in many states, be free to purchase the kind of weapons that have no function in a normal civilized society? These aren't toys, but your country seems to have stricter rules about alcohol consumption than gun ownership. It's bloody stupid.
They are very different and that is reflected in law.
Yes. And such law involves mens rea. There are gun accidents and car murders too. And the law deals with them as appropriate.
So then he should compare like with like rather than going "oh look at all these deaths caused by cars."
« First « Previous Comments 217 - 256 of 376 Next » Last » Search these comments
http://www.sfgate.com/news/crime/article/Official-27-dead-in-Conn-school-shooting-4118512.php
WTF is wrong? This story is bothering me.
#crime