« First « Previous Comments 41 - 44 of 44 Search these comments
Come on he just swore in office on TWO bibles, one was tied to Lincoln and the other one was Kings bible. His ministry of propaganda called him this generation's Kennedy the day he was sworn in the first term.
Those Bibles are a part of US history. Its an historic ceremony and every single inauguration uses historical artifacts, tradition, and places. I believe you're reading wayyyyy too much into this.
Those Bibles are a part of US history. Its an historic ceremony and every single inauguration uses historical artifacts, tradition, and places. I believe you're reading wayyyyy too much into this.
No, he is simply a racist bigoted fool. He think his family values are the only important ones. He is brain dead.
Come on he just swore in office on TWO bibles, one was tied to Lincoln and the other one was Kings bible. His ministry of propaganda called him this generation's Kennedy the day he was sworn in the first term.
Hows your ministry of racism and bigotry, fool!
...Oh and use some of that unemployment money to buy an apostrophe, will ya?
Thanks, TPB! Fucking Hilarious! (I'm a little bit in love with you right now...)
I haven't been watching this thread, mostly because I have a life and therefore have been kinda busy. But from what I can tell, the gist of the thread is the following:
Name calling is legit target for deletion, no question about that.
Oh yeah back to the thread, xxy something or another, you're an asshole.
Just keeping the thread on track with civil discussion.
The typical Patnet post IS demented right wing diatribe.
OH bullshit, you don't have to hate someone to recognize they are full of shit.
A bigot says what?
Your a bigot.
(maybe he is - maybe he isn't - but he does have a point about using apostrophes...)
Racist bigot
Better - although no "period" at the end, signifying you had completed that thought process.
No, he is simply a racist bigoted fool. He think his family values are the only important ones. He is brain dead.
Hows your ministry of racism and bigotry, fool!
The best explanation is the one below:
Threads should run their course without manipulation, IMHO. It's more interesting that way. You learn more from people with opposing views. Either they convince you of something new... Or their arguments help to solidify the opinion you already held. And... name callers hurt their own credibility. No deletion required.... Which should be obvious to anyone who isn't a stupid moron.
See... Now did that last line make YOU feel bad or ME look ridiculous?
Messages get lost in the hyperbole and name calling. Eventually, it all comes back to "Libs bad, Conservatives good," only with childish personal attacks. The only thing that would make it more entertaining would be the "your mom" slams of the 80's...
« First « Previous Comments 41 - 44 of 44 Search these comments
Simple enough. If you post a political post, then you should expect there to be a debate between people who disagree with each other. If that's the case and you then in turn decide to delete any comments that are contrary to your own ideas then you shouldn't post one to start with.
That is all.