« First « Previous Comments 41 - 80 of 126 Next » Last » Search these comments
I would say a clueless twit is someone who invests all his money in one place.
Is someone who holds all his money in cash, also a clueless twit by that definition?
If there is a currency crisis, having all cash is not the best idea.
If there is a currency crisis, having all cash is not the best idea.
Yes, but what if that cash constitutes the only currency which cannot be printed by the corrupt guberment!
Well, hell, since I guess you just accepted your award, I guess I'll take mine! Patrick, do I get a certificate or a medal or something?
Yes, but first, you need to change your avatar to an ass-hole!
yeah, well fortunately for me, my crackerjack analysis has put that one place
as the bets one place ever!!!
Your troll-like behavior makes me wonder if anything you've said is legit.
Yes, but first, you need to change your avatar to an ass-hole!
You being a dog lover that you are, let me recommend this one for you:
You being a dog lover that you are, let me recommend this one for you:
It's perfect, because, now we know which crack his crackerjack analysis is coming from.
it's pretty easy to look up all my properties on the county website...
But, I would recommend our readers, to consult the "National Sex Offenders" registry, first.
yeah, cause you get paid in gold... what a maroon!
The moron is the one who equates everything to $USD, worthless garbage, not worth the paper its written on. Go ahead and believe in your beloved $FED - suck Bernanke's d*ck if you so desire.
yeah, cause you get paid in gold... what a maroon!
And, BTW, 99% of the world's population don't get paid in dollars, either.
I only measure the price of homes in bottles of Charles shaw wine... Yep, homes have gone up a ton!
Only a moron realtwhore would call a house a home.
Charles shaw wine
And, BTW, the price of Charles Shaw wine went from $1.99 a bottle to $3.99 a bottle in just 3 years. The $USD has even fallen, relative to the 2-buck-chuck, which only a 2-cent peddler from Phoenix could drink.
I only measure the price of homes in bottles of Charles shaw wine... Yep, homes have gone up a ton!
Only a moron realtwhore would call a house a home.
Yes, because after all, we all know what the word home means... except, apparently, you.
It is still $1.99 in California, and $2.99 in AZ, just like it has been for a decade, dumbross!!!
"Prices in states other than California have been increased to as high as $3.79 per bottle." - Wikepedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Shaw_wine
Only a moron like you would argue against something that could be so easily verified on the internet.
oh, so now you get paid in Yuan? So you price your homes in that currency? makes sense!
No, but it seems that you equate the price of everything else, to the price of your stinky, scorpion infested chicken coops, in the middle of a dry barren desert. When, supermarkets stop accepting $USD for food, I will be able to buy food with my gold and silver coins. I'd like to see what you can do with your stinky shacks.
It is still $1.99 in California, and $2.99 in AZ, just like it has been for a decade, dumbross!!!
"Prices in states other than California have been increased to as high as $3.79 per bottle." - Wikepedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Shaw_wine
Only a moron like you would argue against something that could be so easily verified on the internet.
So was what he said right or wrong?
It is still $1.99 in California, and $2.99 in AZ, just like it has been for a decade, dumbross!!!
For a guy who is supposedly swimming in dough with all his investments, you sure spend a lot of time buying cheap $2 wine.
It is still $1.99 in California, and $2.99 in AZ, just like it has been for a decade, dumbross!!!
For a guy who is supposedly swimming in dough with all his investments, you sure spend a lot of time buying cheap $2 wine.
So it's back to $2 now. That was quick.
So it's back to $2 now. That was quick.
No, it's still called $2-buck-chuck, but it's not $2 any more. That's why I said $2 wine. But, nice try, anyway.
So it's back to $2 now. That was quick.
No, it's still called $2-buck-chuck, but it's not $2 any more. That's why I said $2 wine. But, nice try, anyway.
It isn't $2 anymore? I'm pretty sure I've seen it for $1.99...
It is still $1.99 in California
It's not even $2 in California any more. What a total, complete fool you are filthy house peddler from Phoenix. You can't even argue on your own turf. Ha, ha, ha!
http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_22420517/trader-joes-two-buck-chuck-price-rises-249-bottle
It is still $1.99 in California
It's not even $2 in California any more. What a total, complete fool you are filthy house peddler from Phoenix. You can't even argue on your own turf. Ha, ha, ha!
http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_22420517/trader-joes-two-buck-chuck-price-rises-249-bottle
Wow, absolutely ridiculous. You pull someone up in post after post about the price of a cheap bottle of wine that has just within a matter of weeks been raised in price to the staggering amount of $2.49. What exactly are you doing? It's just idiotic, much like your home comment. I remember Darrell in Phoenix saying the same thing. Says it all really.
It isn't $2 anymore? I'm pretty sure I've seen it for $1.99...
Listen some more to your friend - the Bernanke-c**k-sucker, and you will believe in even more things.
You pull someone up in post after post about the price of a cheap bottle of wine that has just within a matter of weeks been raised in price to the staggering amount of $2.49. What exactly are you doing?
I didn't bring up the cheap wine. It's your friend, the millionaire c**k-sucker who brought it up.
I didn't bring up the cheap wine. It's your friend, the millionaire c**k-sucker who brought it up. And, if you recall, he tried to let everyone know that I was wrong again, even about this. Let this be on the record, that, I was right, as always, the c**k-sucker was the one who called me a liar for no reason at all, when he was the one, who was wrong.
You pull someone up in post after post about the price of a cheap bottle of wine that has just within a matter of weeks been raised in price to the staggering amount of $2.49. What exactly are you doing?
I didn't bring up the cheap wine. It's your friend, the millionaire c**k-sucker who brought it up.
Er, he's not my friend. And you are the one who spent an inordinate amount of time going on about his figures being wrong because, finally, you found out that, shock-horror, the price was raised to $2.49 a little over a month ago. Does this triumph make you feel better about yourself?
It isn't $2 anymore? I'm pretty sure I've seen it for $1.99...
Listen some more to your friend - the Bernanke-c**k-sucker, and you will believe in even more things.
I was at my HOME in Monterey in January. It was $1.99. But thank you for finally finding out that it has gone up by 50c in the last 6 weeks so that you can shout about how right you are and how wrong Roberto is. Very grown up.
you found out that, shock-horror, the price was raised to $2.49 a little over a month ago.
You missed the point, entirely. Now, you're trying to protect your friend, by attacking me. The idiot peddler from Phoenix tried to dishonor my good reputation on this blog, by attacking me about some cheap $2 wine, and then, both of you tried to attack me. I quietly retorted and proved both of you completely wrong, although it was your friend, the moron beastiologist from the desert, who accused me of being wrong about some stupid wine which he loves to drink so much.
You missed the point, entirely. Now, you're trying to protect your friend, by attacking me. The idiot peddler from Phoenix tried to dishonor my good reputation on this blog, by attacking me about some cheap $2 wine, and then, both of you tried to attack me. I quietly retorted and proved both of you completely wrong, although it was your friend, the moron beastiologist from the desert, who accused me of being wrong about some stupid wine which he loves to drink so much.
Good grief. You went to Wiki and it didn't prove your point. You then got lucky and found out that they had very recently raised the price by 50c, 50c in a decade. Well done. Congratulations! Should we throw a party?
Do you understand how childish you sound with these posts? Mind, your 'tried to dishonor my good reputation by attacking me about some cheap $2 wine' comment made me laugh. Presumably calling someone a 'beastiologist' is perfectly fine though.
But thank you for finally finding out that it has gone up by 50c in the last 6 weeks
I see, now. You're a fan of the Math professor, because, compared to you, his knowledge of math seems gargantuous. Do you realize that 50c increase on $2 is a 25% increase. That's even more than the price increase of a rotten middle-of-a-desert chicken coup, according to your friend the math-mizering, dog-sniffing c**k-sucker.
You went to Wiki and it didn't prove your point
Why didn't Wiki prove my point. Wiki said that price went up from $2 to $3.79 in all states, except California. That's not a proof enough for you. Oh, sorry, I forgot that you never graduated from 3rd grade in Math.
I see, now. You're a fan of the Math professor, because, compared to you, his knowledge of math seems gargantuous. Do you realize that 50c increase on $2 is a 25% increase. That's even more than the price increase of a rotten middle-of-a-desert chicken coup, according to your friend the math-mizering, dog-sniffing c**k-sucker.
How long has the wine been on the market? How much has it gone up in that period? Raising the price by 50c doesn't necessarily mean that costs have suddenly shot up, does it? And like I said, try acting like an adult because your whiny little attacks make you sound very immature indeed.
And like I said, try acting like an adult because your whiny little attacks make you sound very immature indeed.
Hey, what's going on here? You accuse me of spending too much time talking about the stupid wine, and you, yourself, can't stop foaming at your mouth, talking about it, now can you? Tell me the truth - is the math-mizer sucking your c**k now, too?
"Prices in states other than California have been increased to as high as $3.79 per bottle."
You stated, and I quote "Prices in states other than California have been increased to as high as $3.79 per bottle." That doesn't mean that the prices in CA couldn't still have been $1.99 and $2.99 where Roberto lives. But no, no, you were right. Prices went up 50c six weeks ago, so you can celebrate how right you were and how wrong we were. Well done. Mind, I'm pretty sure Trader Joe's has special offers. When they do, does that mean I'll be right again? Oh, how exciting.
And like I said, try acting like an adult because your whiny little attacks make you sound very immature indeed.
Hey, what's going on here? You accuse me of spending too much time talking about the stupid wine, and you, yourself, can't stop foaming at your mouth, talking about it, now can you? Tell me the truth - is the math-mizer sucking your c**k now, too?
Well, someone posts and someone responds. That's generally how a forum works. Your post just struck me as a very strange basis for trying to attack your online foe. I'm just wondering why you are doing it and what you are trying to prove because I really don't see your goal. Much like your home comment.
He is Mr. Logarithm,
He is Mr. sin,
He is Mr. Pythogarean Theorem,
He is Mr. 2-buck-wine!
Everything that he touch, turns to lies in his clutch!
He is too, he is too, he is too much!
He is Mr. Logarithm,
He is Mr. sin,
He is Mr. Pythogarean Theorem,
He is Mr. 2-buck-wine!
Everything that he touch, turns to lies in his clutch!
He is too, he is too, he is too much!
Do you not think you are taking your Roberto fixation a little too far?
Do you not think you are taking your Roberto fixation a little too far?
No, sir, you seem to be the one who is fixated on Roberto. In fact, you got so hung up on attacking me on this, that you, yourself, forgot that it was Roberto who accused me of lying about the wine.
That doesn't mean that the prices in CA couldn't still have been $1.99 and $2.99 where Roberto lives.
The Math-mizer doesn't live in CA. He can't afford to live here.
Do you not think you are taking your Roberto fixation a little too far?
No, sir, you seem to be the one who is fixated on Roberto. In fact, you got so hung up on attacking me on this, that you, yourself, forgot that it was Roberto who accused me of lying about the wine.
Eh? The posts are right above. You said the wine had gone up in price to $3.99 in 3 years + naturally, added an insult. No they hadn't. Roberto pulled you up on that, giving figures that were correct until 6 weeks ago. He didn't accuse you of lying. He pointed out that your figures were inaccurate. Who, exactly, was more off base with their figures?
« First « Previous Comments 41 - 80 of 126 Next » Last » Search these comments
Now that super low interest rates are baked into payments, the top is forming in pricing. I know that one month does not make a trend, but one would expect stronger sales with prices increases that we had and we did not get it.
http://dqnews.com/Articles/2013/News/California/Bay-Area/RRBay130314.aspx