1
0

More than half of properties in hot san fran zip on Trulia are foreclosures!


 invite response                
2013 Mar 16, 1:33am   8,225 views  16 comments

by coriacci1   ➕follow (2)   ignore  

Comments 1 - 16 of 16        Search these comments

1   Bubbabeefcake   2013 Mar 16, 4:40am  

The Professor says

If we are in RE recovery how can there be so many foreclosed and pre-foreclosed properties?

The Fed is moving the market as a command economy. Inflation will stop him. If he stays 0 after 2015, Medicare and SS will need a bailout and pension funds private and public will have to cut retiree promises since they won't meet actuary estimates.

 ...the story has yet to unfold Professor

2   thomaswong.1986   2013 Mar 16, 4:48am  

The Professor says

If we are in RE recovery how can there be so many foreclosed and pre-foreclosed properties?

part of the recovery back down to normal..

3   Dan8267   2013 Mar 16, 2:28pm  

coriacci1 says

http://www.trulia.com/CA/San_Francisco/94110/

Very first property:

$1,400,000
$6,274 / mo mortgage

Only a fucking idiot would think this house is worth anywhere near that. It's worth less than one fifth that price.

The freaking taxes on this property if you paid $1.4 million for it would be about $14,000 / yr. And that's at 1% taxation!

Yes, housing prices have a long way to come down in some areas.

4   Philistine   2013 Mar 16, 2:54pm  

Dan8267 says

Only a fucking idiot would think this house is worth anywhere near that

Loving how they call it a "Victorian" facade--oh, yes, the '70s composite siding and flat Taco Bell roof are just ooozing with character and charm of a bygone era. I guess you're paying $1.4 mill for a Connoisseur's Property.

5   Tenpoundbass   2013 Mar 17, 12:37am  

WTF!!! That place looks like a flipper put his Home Depot mark of cheap crap all over Archie Bunkers house.

6   RichieRich   2013 Mar 17, 1:52am  

This is the norm here in SF. Another reason why I am considering on moving. If only I could get the same wages elsewhere.

7   Mick Russom   2013 Mar 17, 3:14am  

robertoaribas says

It is worth what someone will pay for it.

No, its worth whatever a scammer can get a scammy bank to lend at 0%. Nobody pays for anything anymore, they borrow gigantic sums of money and are one economic dip or a job loss form total failure

8   coriacci1   2013 Mar 17, 3:22am  

Nobody pays for anything anymore, they borrow gigantic sums of money and are one economic dip or a job loss form total failure

thus the high number ( when i checked it was 76 foreclosures outta 115 for sales in the 94110 zip) of foreclosures in this hotter than hot google bus to silicone valley neighborhood? just asking.

9   Bigsby   2013 Mar 19, 6:31pm  

The Professor says

Google pays the most with a mid career median salary of $141K. Facebooks median start pay is under $60K. I just don't see how these wages can support those prices. Just what do these companies produce that can't be made elsewhere?

"Navy seals of the workforce"? I know a SEAL and all he wants to do is blow stuff up and party.

Yeah, but the salary is just one part of many of those people's packages. A good family friend was one of the first 100 or so through the door at Google. I believe he was making a 100k or thereabouts when he started with them. He is now a retired multi-millionaire. That didn't come from the salary. The amount he made may be very unusual, but there seem to be quite a lot of people making good bonuses or cashing out share options to drive the prices you are seeing.

10   Facebooksux   2013 Mar 19, 11:15pm  

SFace says

You can't say they are not smart because they are the navy seal of the workforce.

This is one of the most idiotic phrases I've heard yet. I hope a real Frogman shoves his foot up your ass for using such a stupid analogy. I'm sure they'd be honored to be compared to some skinny-jean wearing asswipe with Aspergers who drinks Kombucha and writes code that can infect your computer and track every keystroke in order to sell it to some multi-national conglomerate to bonbard you with ads for shit you don't need.

11   Bigsby   2013 Mar 19, 11:23pm  

Facebooksux says

This is one of the most idiotic phrases I've heard yet. I hope a real Frogman shoves his foot up your ass for using such a stupid analogy. I'm sure they'd be honored to be compared to some skinny-jean wearing asswipe with Aspergers who drinks Kombucha and writes code that can infect your computer and track every keystroke in order to sell it to some multi-national conglomerate to bonbard you with ads for shit you don't need.

Why's it stupid? It's an analogy. The top silicon valley companies recruit some of the best and the brightest from around the world, do they not? That makes them part of the elite of the workforce.

12   EBGuy   2013 Mar 20, 9:46am  

Is there something special about 94110?
It still has a bit of urban grit, but has settled down enough since the gang injunction. It's next to Noe, which has already undergone gentrification, and North Bernal, which is on the upswing. That and easy access to the highway for commutes south. BTW, a $700k 2/1 is bought for development potential.

13   coriacci1   2013 Mar 20, 9:51am  

EBGuy says

Is there something special about 94110?

google busses that whisk google turds to silicone valley then dump them at the curb when back in 94110

14   Philistine   2013 Mar 20, 9:53am  

The Professor says

So what I hear you saying is that rich people are buying up all of these
undersized, overpriced (IMO) houses in the 94110.


So this bubble is being blown by seals from high tech instead of NINJA's with
HELOCS.

So this is how the rich are living? In $1.4mill tear-downs?

15   EBGuy   2013 Mar 20, 10:31am  

The Prof said: Who would ever pay 1.7M for a 3k sq ft lot 2 blocks from highway 101?
The home at 347 Mullen just sold for $2 million and is less than two blocks from 101.

16   curious2   2013 Mar 20, 10:38am  

Philistine says

So this is how the rich are living? In $1.4mill tear-downs?

Yes, this is what happens when federal policy concentrates resources at the top of the income scale: you get a bubble in the high end market including Klimt paintings and trophy locations for real estate. It's the same Klimt painting, or the same Van Gogh or whatever, but it carries an astronomical price tag because it's a trophy and the bidders are surfing a tsunami of cash. The numbers seem incomprehensible to median wage earners, but in fact they result from policies enacted by the politicians that median wage earners elected. Meanwhile, it's the same tear-down house, but it costs 10x more.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste