Comments 1 - 15 of 206 Next » Last » Search these comments
In a nut shell Keynesians believe government can and should control the economy.
lol-I love it when posters completely bastardize Keynes. Perhaps you wouldn't be so dismissive if you actually understand his theories
In a nut shell Keynesians believe government can and should control the economy.
lol-I love it when posters completely bastardize Keynes. Perhaps you wouldn't be so dismissive if you actually understand his theories
I'm sure you understand the nuisances better than I.
Just look at the results that is all anyone needs to know.
I'm sure you understand the nuisances better than I.
Just look at the results that is all anyone needs to know.
Good idea--please share how you view the results. What problems do you attribute to Keynesian economics? Specifically--which actions, which laws, etc.
Good idea--please share how you view the results. What problems do you attribute to Keynesian economics? Specifically--which actions, which laws, etc.
You first
You first
I'm not the one who said the results is all anyone needs to know. Please elaborate on that statement. To which results do you refer?
Lets go with everything to the right of the graph is Keynesian and everything to the left is Free Market

One hundred years after its creation, consumer prices are about 30 times higher than what they were in 1913.
http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-inflation-since-1775-2013-1
Average per capita income was around $7k in 1933 Per capita income is around 43k in 2012 by the above it should be around 210k
http://www.demographia.com/db-pc1929.pdf
1933 was when FDR confiscated the gold
Just look at the results that is all anyone needs to know.
The results of what? No one has implemented Keynes theories. They only implemented the part where government spends. Perhaps you should actually read and understand Keynes before you comment.
One hundred years after its creation, consumer prices are about 30 times higher than what they were in 1913.
And the wages are how much higher?
The results of what? No one has implemented Keynes theories. They only implemented the part where government spends. Perhaps you should actually read and understand Keynes before you comment.
That is a fair and unfair argument at the same time. When you have a "theory" where you start with money printing, then - if you have any hands-on experience of how things work in practice - you would immediately realize that the rest of the theory will never be implemented. Drop a helicopter full of money onto NYC but tell the people they have to equally share it and "pay it back" eventually and see how far they will listen. Same goes for controlled money printing and special interests. Hence that "theory" is worthless in practice.
The results of what? No one has implemented Keynes theories. They only implemented the part where government spends. Perhaps you should actually read and understand Keynes before you comment.
I understand plenty. Actions are what I look at, the hell with the theory.
Besides it must be hard to get one's head that far up his ass.
Statue of John Maynard Keynes

Actions are what I look at, the hell with the theory.
Well then why the hell would you call it Keynesian if you know it's not? Call it politicians spending too much on defense because that's what it is.
When you have a "theory" where you start with money printing, then
If that was the start of his theory, you might have a point.
Well then why the hell would you call it Keynesian if you know it's not? Call it politicians spending too much on defense because that's what it is.
That is non sequitur WW 2 was about 10 year after Keynes started his perversion of the U.S.

Keynes argued against a return to the gold standard after the war.
Well then why the hell would you call it Keynesian if you know it's not? Call it politicians spending too much on defense because that's what it is.
Because Keynesianism provides the intellectual cover for the politicians doing the looting in western democracies, just like Marxism provided the intellectual cover for the politicians doing the looting in the former eastern bloc countries in the 20th century. Before that, before even the western enlightened societies emerged, it was the Divine Right of King theory that provided the intellectual cover for the looting.
See, while wealth and power is never equally distributed in any society just like people are born with different degrees of beauty and talent . . . the systemic use of force to loot the vast cross section of the society by a tiny minority of elite always requires an intellectual fog cover (lest there be immediate revolt). Keynsianism provides that cover and mind fog to keep the masses down.
Comments 1 - 15 of 206 Next » Last » Search these comments
http://mises.org/daily/6420/Two-Sides-of-the-Same-Debased-Coin