patrick.net

Does seem true:

https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/rfk-jr-names-the-government-agency

RFK Jr. recently sat down with Dr. Phil, and he stunned the audience when a woman named Emily asked him point-blank about the toxic aerosols being sprayed over us every day.

“My biggest concern is the stratospheric aerosol injections that are continuously peppered on us every day,” Emily said.

“Bromium, aluminum, strontium—it’s sprayed in our skies. All day long.”

“And I know you've talked to Dane Wigington about this, he seems to be one of the experts in the field...”

“How do we stop it?” she asked.

Most politicians would’ve panicked, deflected, or dismissed the question entirely.

But not RFK Jr. He looked her in the eye, answered without hesitation, and said, “That is not in my agency.”

He didn’t deny it was happening. He didn’t hide behind bureaucratic language. He simply made it clear: this isn’t coming from HHS.

Then came the bombshell.

“You know, we [HHS] don’t do that. It’s done—we think—by DARPA.”

Let that sink in. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) might be behind what’s being sprayed in our skies.

And according to RFK Jr., “A lot of it now is coming out of the jet fuel,” he said. “Those [toxic] materials are put in jet fuel.”

“I’m going to do everything in my power to stop it,” Kennedy added. “We’re bringing on somebody who’s going to think only about that.”

He ended with a vow that few in Washington would ever dare make: “Find out who’s doing it and holding them accountable.”

https://x.com/RobertKennedyJr/status/1828160428154966286

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/oh-harvard-wednesday-may-28-2025

Meanwhile, reports of atmospheric haze, reflective sky phenomena, and “milky” sun halos have cropped up globally in the past decade, especially post-2015. Aluminum, barium, and strontium — all known candidates for aerosol geoengineering — have turned up in rainwater sampling and soil studies.

And, of course, the chemtrails. Skywatchers constantly complain about increased aviation patterns at high altitudes during “non-traffic” periods, and about bizarre, persistent contrail patterns that slowly expand into a thin grey morass that smears the sky instead of evaporating.

Chemtrails are practically mainstream now. They’re not even denying it anymore. Two days ago, Phys.org ran a story headlined, “Florida bill would ban 'chemtrails' and 'geoengineering.' But what are they?”

“Geoengineering—also known as climate engineering—refers to large-scale efforts to combat climate change,” the article explained, “including proposals to fire small reflective aluminum particles into the air to act as mirrors and deflect the sun's rays away from Earth.”

The story quoted Stanford atmospheric scientist Mark Jacobson — no backwoods tinfoil hat wearer — who called solar geoengineering a “horrible idea,” warning that “reducing sunlight reduces photosynthesis,” which could lead to mass crop failure and global starvation. But so what? Climate change!

They don’t always call it SRM. That’s Harvard’s preferred label. Governments and defense agencies have a long, Orwellian history of using dual-purpose research and thesaurus-heavy relabeling programs, like “atmospheric opacity studies,” “solar albedo field experiments,” and “high-altitude particulate distribution models.”

The Guardian tells us that 21% of the global ocean has darkened since 2003 — compressing the photic zone where 90% of marine life lives and where phytoplankton churn out oxygen and food like an unseen but absolutely essential factory.

So … if even small-scale atmospheric dimming — like from volcanic eruptions — can lower the amount of light reaching the surface, what happens when high-altitude planes release solar-reflective particles directly into the stratosphere? The answer is: they don’t know. That’s why they are testing it, dummy.

Patrick says

proposals to fire small reflective aluminum particles into the air to act as mirrors and deflect the sun's rays away from Earth.”

Does that guy realize how voluminous the atmosphere is? That would be like pissing in Lake Erie in Buffalo and expecting a swimmer at Toledo to smell it.

HeadSet says

Patrick says

proposals to fire small reflective aluminum particles into the air to act as mirrors and deflect the sun's rays away from Earth.”

Does that guy realize how voluminous the atmosphere is? That would be like pissing in Lake Erie in Buffalo and expecting a swimmer at Toledo to smell it.

Good analogy. Also planes have weights and balances, as you know. Where are these extra chemicals coming from if it's a fully loaded flight? Liquids aren't light and if you want to spray a lot of people, well you need a shit load of liquid.

Jet engines need clean fuel, so it's not getting mixed in there. Chem trails are one of the dumber conspiracy theories. Watch a crop duster. They have to be on top of the crops practically to be effective. At 35k feet it's gonna blow wherever and not hit the target and blow through upper level winds. Hell might get caught in the jet stream and just blow into the Oceans. Makes no sense.

WookieMan says

At 35k feet it's gonna blow wherever and not hit the target and blow through upper level winds.

I have personally dumped 40,000 pounds of fuel flying at 34,000 ft over the beaches of Marseilles, France. I am sure none of the beachgoers felt a drop.

The solution for pollution is dilution.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/weather-or-not-tuesday-june-17-2025

Yesterday, the UK Times ran a story breathlessly headlined, “Enemies could weaponise new weather technologies against UK.” ...

Weather technologies? Wait. You mean … chemtrails? If you feel puzzled, because you’ve been assured many times by compliant corporate media that people who believe in weather manipulation are seditious kooks and social media trolls, think again.

“Ministers,” the Times explained, “are examining how technologies designed to combat global warming could be weaponised by hostile foreign powers.” Hahahaha! It’s two admissions in one! Let me translate: atmospheric global warming technologies are weather weapons.

They are fretting about so-called “solar radiation modification” (SRM), which is alleged to help “cool the earth” by “artificially” reflecting sunlight away from the Earth’s surface. The Simpsons tried to warn them back in 1995:




... Lest you be tempted to think that they are talking about something besides chemtrails, think again. Oh, they don’t want to say it, of course, but there it was anyway, like your best frenemy popping up at a high school house party you were sure they didn’t know about:

This can theoretically be achieved using two main techniques. The first involves
shooting aerosols into the atmosphere that will bounce the sun's rays back into
space. The second involves increasing the reflectivity of clouds over the ocean
by spraying tiny droplets of sea water into the air.

The story’s expert, Dan Marks, an “energy security” researcher at the Royal Institute, drolly observed (cue British accent), “Almost every country is vulnerable to some type of extreme weather, so if you can make that weather better with the technology, you can likely make it worse by deploying the technology at the opposite time.” Now they tell us. ...

You aren’t the only Faraday-cage-capped lunatics concerned about chemtrails. “More than 560 academics,” the Times reported, “have signed an open letter calling for an international non-use agreement on solar geoengineering.” Read it for yourself.

https://www.solargeoeng.org/

Don’t hold your breath waiting for anyone to admit they’ve been lying about chemtrails for decades, and now they can’t hide it anymore. I really cannot understand how these media people can live with themselves. Which is worse? The chemtrail sprayers or the gaslighting media?

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/dizzying-dichotomies-saturday-october

This week, the Palm Beach Post ran an unintentionally terrific story headlined, “Florida airports start reporting banned ‘weather modification’ aircraft per chemtrails ban.” Don’t drag that stuff down here.

Florida’s new anti-chemtrail law took effect on July 1st, and it is driving the media straight off the cliffs of insanity. Actually called the “Clear Skies” law, but media compulsively calls it the “chemtrails ban.”And in an alarming, terets-like way, whenever it’s mentioned, they obsessively recite several detailed paragraphs explaining how “chemtrails” are in fact just harmless ice crystals formed from harmless water vapor in harmless jet exhaust, as though we haven’t already heard that implausible excuse a hundred million times already. At least.

The word “conspiracy” appears eight times in the Post’s brief article. Of course.

It seems to me that the skies have been much clearer since Florida’s Chemtrails Ban took effect. I can’t recall a single day since when the sky was crisscrossed with lines. Nor any weird “smear” clouds. Just my personal observation, for whatever that’s worth. And, for the first time in ten years, no hurricane hit land in Florida during the month of September. I’m just saying, but that happy coincidence reflects badly on corporate media’s chemtrails deniers.

Anyway, the “news” was that the reporting requirement kicked in on October 1st. So far, two airports in Florida have filed formal notices with the FAA “closing” their landing strips to “geoengineering and weather modification aircraft” absent prior permission. Prior permission, assuming it is ever requested, allows the airport to snitch on all geoengineering planes to the State of Florida.

The media reporting on this developing story is nearly psychotic. The thing that isn’t happening keeps making news. They keep explaining their ice crystals theory, over and over, but everyone —readers, lawmakers, airport personnel— keeps ignoring them.

Patrick says

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)

didn't Trump rename it WARPA?