by CL follow (1)
Comments 1 - 14 of 22 Next » Last » Search these comments
You're wanting a cure for the Human condition, but for only one race?
The African tribes wanted the European goods and were willing to trade their own people as slaves to get these goods. These tribes also did this with the Arabs in the same fashion. As a matter of fact the only thing remarkable was that Europeans were the first people to start banning slavery. The problem wasn't slavery (as it was a worldwide construct) but that they were treated poorly in the US long after their emancipation.
They are being treated worse in Africa today by their own Dictators.
I'm all for ending racism. It makes me ill when people are blatantly hateful towards people they don't know simply for how dark their skin is or how their eyes slant or because they're a damned ginger!
But lets examine your argument:
1) slavery is bad, ummkay? Word, but it replaced something even worse: genocide of losing nations. That used to happen four thousand years ago before slavery was invented. It was still going on in the 1400s in the Aztec and Maya empires because they'd never got the bright idea. So it's bad, but historically, it's actually a step forward.
2) Jim Crow laws, anti-miscenation laws, lynching, and vote barring are bad and caused damage to blacks. Emphatic support, no argument.
3) blacks disproportionately imprisoned today, exacerbated by the prison industrial complex: yes, true, but if they'd stop committing a really awfully disproportionate amount of crimes, this would be different. Asians don't have this problem, accounting for disproportionately fewer inmates. The prison system is a related matter and it's a crying shame. There's no reason we should have privately run prisons lobbying for stricter laws, harsher sentencing, and more tax dollars to lock up citizens.
4) manufacturing loss, union busting, post office decline, etc is bad for blacks: yes, but it's bad for all races. That's an American tragedy, caused by wealthy elite who pushed for it, not white people in general who are actually more affected by this than blacks.
5) college, housing costs going up too high: yes, but this affects everyone who's not already wealthy. It's another tool the wealthy elite are using to enslave ordinary citizens. You could argue that blacks are less affected by this because more of them are on public assistance and can buy no houses and their kids get public grants and loans for college.
Summary: today it's not about race. It's about the wealthy elite vs the rest of us. They constantly try to divide us using race or religion or political views, so that they are not facing a population united against our true enemies. Will you believe the propaganda or will you recognize it for the divisive lies that it is, and refuse to participate?
The problem wasn't slavery (as it was a worldwide construct) but that they were treated poorly in the US long after their emancipation.
Right, Although, uncompensated, forced labor certainly gave the Caucasians a leg up, and gave them a leg down. It was the century + after that that gets left out of these discussions. There has not been a period of accommodation, but there has been a prolonged period of thuggery on the part of the white power structure.
They are being treated worse in Africa today by their own Dictators.
Ah, yes. Their freely elected dictators, with no help from the West!
I'm all for ending racism
I agree with much of what you've said, but insofar as the black community is and has always been largely poor or middle class, and have little representation in the Congress, Business world, or justice system, they are disproportionately adversely affected.
If the right had its way, the USPS would be destroyed. Is it any coincidence it's also the largest employer of African-Americans?
And if it were to be destroyed, it would impact the black community much more than the white community, right? So, policies may have destroyed the rung on the ladder that allowed blacks to escape the poverty the white community drove them into.
Same with prisons: If the system is rigged, it is even moreso against the black community. Just like convict lease, the laws are geared toward imprisoning blacks and then stealing their franchise. AND, it destroys family support they need to send their kids to school, get jobs, and avoid crime.
The question is does the concept of "community" even exist in a capitalist society? Aren't we all simply individual competitors battling it out in the marketplace for power to purchase products and services beneath our smiles and pleasantries?
The African tribes wanted the European goods and were willing to trade their own people as slaves to get these goods. These tribes also did this with the Arabs in the same fashion
And to this day, they are still dealing in slavery.
I agree with much of what you've said, but insofar as the black community is and has always been largely poor or middle class, and have little representation in the Congress, Business world, or justice system, they are disproportionately adversely affected.
But when you do count the AA members in Congress or leaders in Business and other groups.. this is not case by a long shot. There are many african americans in leadership positions. they just are not Democrats.. so you dismiss them.
Hello ... we have a Black president ... what do you mean "little representation".
old Jessie just holding back them tears..

The African tribes wanted the European goods and were willing to trade their own people as slaves to get these goods. These tribes also did this with the Arabs in the same fashion.
Actually, they didn't trade 'their own people'. They traded neighboring groups. It's more like a Frenchman selling an Englishman into slavery. They're both white, even share some common history, but they see themselves as very different.
One question is why Africa could not develop comparable technology to that of Europe.
yo! Shostakovich.. you forgot your white as bleach as well..
are u ready to bust a cap in your own melon ?
Comments 1 - 14 of 22 Next » Last » Search these comments
Aside from the intolerable uncompensated work for centuries, the murder, destruction of families and so on that resulted from slavery, what did the Europeans do to make up for their atrocities?
Starting after emancipation, they created the Convict Lease programs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convict_lease
But, surely, after the slaves were freed, and the convict lease program was underway, at least they could vote.
Unless you count the hurdles, like literacy tests and poll taxes, or lynching to prevent them from exercising their franchise.
Well, you say, at least they were free (aside from the economic, political or any conventional sense)! Free at least to marry whoever they wanted! Unless that person was white (until 1967)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia
Oh! Dang...I almost forgot about Jim Crow! And our prison industrial complex! And the destruction of the Manufacturing sector, Unions, the Post Office and other methods that the black community used to use to lift themselves up.
It would be a lot easier to help themselves if the goddamned oppressors would take their boots off the black man's neck, I'd say.
Conversely, what positives have been done? Have they worked?
Apparently I've been asleep while all of the rapprochement has occurred? We can end affirmative action now, end the CRA, the VRA and make college super expensive. We can kill grants, destroy homeownership, accelerate African-American unemployment, imprison them disproportionately, and throughout, keep the spoils of their labor.
I mean, what's wrong with THEM?