patrick.net

MershedPerturders says

Can there please be a wretched corrupted bitch category?

Thank you for the lovely example.

This is a ridiculous point to argue, but if you must... I will engage for a short time.

Honestly, how many women do you know who are abandoning their children (not counting abortion, of course) vs. the amount of men who have chosen to not be involved with their children (not supporting them or having much, if any contact)? In my personal experience, I have never met a woman who has left her child. I have met a number of men who do not know or barely know their children.

This is why we hear about single moms much more than about single dads.

This is why there are laws to make men at the least, financially responsible for their children.

I know you will probably call me names and rip this very reasonable response apart. Have fun with it!

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 24 million children in America -- one out of three -- live in biological father-absent homes.

Consequently, there is a "father factor" in nearly all of the social issues facing America today.

- See more at: http://www.fatherhood.org/media/consequences-of-father-absence-statistics#sthash.CnTy4B4X.dpuf

and

The Typical Single Parent is a Mother:

Approximately 84% of custodial parents are mothers, and
16% of custodial parents are fathers

http://singleparents.about.com/od/legalissues/p/portrait.htm

Contrary to what you see in the press (or Barbie), misogyny is not rampant in modern societies. There is no evil patriarchy oppressing women. Quite the reverse: Both men and women are guilty of misandry, a bias against men. My City Journal article reviews the overwhelming evidence (ignored or suppressed by misandrist journalists and scholars) of bias against men, from the ‘women are wonderful’ effect reported by psychologists to the discrimination against men in the legal system, government, schools, corporations, and academia.

This misandrist bias is probably innate, and it’s being exploited by a diversity industry that falsely blames sexism for any gender gap not favouring women. Yes, women are ‘underrepresented’ in some fields, especially at the top, but it’s not because of discrimination. It’s because of factors like the ‘gender productivity gap’ and the ‘competition gap’ (which explains why scientists in the 99th percentile of productivity are disproportionately male, and why 95 of the top 100 Scrabble players are men). The misogyny myth serves the interests of the diversity industry, but it’s enormously damaging to the rest of society — women as well as men — because it poisons relations between the sexes and undermines the system that has provided unprecedented opportunities and prosperity to everyone: meritocracy.