patrick.net

lets make sure we extend 'equal opportunity' to the 'front lines' aka cannon fodder jobs.

Mandy Lifeboats says

How 'bout we just keep everyone at home?

How about we JUST send feminists to Iraq? I mean they're theoretically capable of doing practically anything according to the reports I've heard.

http://www.42sI2G4m5aU

Men and Women that listen to the Liberal filth, deserve what they become. Senseless bastards sitting around waiting for validation from the Liberals for their miserable existence. This is so NOT what the Liberal education promised them, a world where EVERYONE is a winner.

Turn that shit off and go get a job, they are out there for everyone.
You just have to weed out the Liberal HR mother fuckers that have taken the agenda beyond the classroom. Also don't patronize any business that doesn't hire you based on Liberal bias, mumbo jumbo bullshit.

"Don't believe the hype!" - it's ironic that those lyrics were written during Bush Sr's administration, but has fit more so to the last 3 two termers.

CaptainShuddup says

Men and Women that listen to the Liberal filth, deserve what they become.

You are so full of bullshit. I'm the most god-damn liberal person on this site and I appall the way men are treated in the family court system, which is the primary reason that marriage rates have plummeted over the past 30 years. The treatment of men as second class citizens in the family court system is the most antithetical practice to liberalism there is. Liberalism believes in absolute equality under law for all persons regardless of anything.

The 1970s misandry perversion of feminism has nothing to do with liberalism and everything to do with capitalism, the taking advantage of those with less bargaining power (in this case, less bargaining power in the family court system). Blame capitalism, not liberalism, for the destruction of the family. Capitalism says that financial gain justifies every means; liberalism doesn't.

MershedPerturders says

Men, math, and marriage

Unfortunate, but true. The family court system, not gay marriage, is what has killed "traditional" marriage. Why doesn't the Christian right protest against that?

Not all women are the same, but all family court systems are. That's what's important to remember. It's not most women who are the problem; it's every family court. Our legal system has adopted the philosophy that men are inherently evil, cruel, and inferior -- which cannot be further from the truth in the vast majority of cases -- and should be treated as such.

But there are consequences to screwing over half the population for decades. That half of the population reacts by changing its behavior. In this case, that is why fewer Gen Xer's got married and far fewer Millennials will get married. The family court system is the primary reason why half of first time mothers are single, and it's teen pregnancy; it's 30-something single women realizing that they will never marry but deciding they still want a child enough that they'll go it alone.

And what are the consequences? After all, 1970s pseudo-feminists misandrists said "a women needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle" and ridiculed Dan Quale when he said men play an important role in the upbringing of children and eliminating men from the family unit would have negative consequences. [Yes, this is one of the few times Dan Quale was right.]

The result is that massive numbers of single mothers and their children languish in poverty as shown in the quotes below.

The poverty rate for single-mother families in 2011 was 40.9%, nearly five times more than the rate (8.8%) for married-couple families.

Today, 1 in 3 children – a total of 15 million – are being raised without a father. Of that group, nearly half live below the poverty line.

Around 45% of single mothers have never married, around 55% are either divorced, separated or widowed.4 Half have one child, 30% have two.

Quale, like Sinead O'Connor, was right. [Bet you never thought you'd hear those two being called right in the same sentence.]

One of the things that distinguishes liberals from either the left or the right is that liberals have loyalty to the truth, whatever the hell it is.

CaptainShuddup says

Also don't patronize any business that doesn't hire you based on Liberal bias, mumbo jumbo bullshit.

there are none left, they've been taxed or regulated out of existence.

Quigley says

The real reason women make less money than men is because they won't work as hard as men will (on average) to make a living, preferring the easier jobs and making up the difference by leeching from men. Even when they are in identical professions, they usually work less hours than their male counterparts and so make less money (if hourly paid) or are eligible for fewer promotions (if salaried).

this is why I wont work for a woman manager. Not because she's a woman and I discriminate, but because of the things you state. They NEVER work as hard as men, they are rarely prepared or intelligent enough to be working their job, and they got there simply by working the system.

Feminism is welfare for spoiled white women. It buy society precisely NOTHING.

Dan8267 says

After all, 1970s pseudo-feminists misandrists said "a women needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle"

you're only half the way there. There is no 'pseudo' feminism. The idea was flawed from the beginning. Women always worked jobs- even before feminism. Society, and even women themselves assumed they would be spending a lot of time raising children thus they assumed that the life paths of men were simply not open to them. Notice that since the advent of Feminism practically anything natural for men to do has become financially and socially impossible.

Gloria Steinem, whom you quote above admitted later that she was actually working for the CIA. Just recently Obama presented her with an award.

Once this thing collapses, these NWO women are going to be screwed beyond belief because they rely on this system to survive. They don't have families, they don't do anything useful, they require enormous levels of credit just to even sustain the way they look. What will become of them when reality hits? Who cares. They've stated by their actions that they have no allegiance to humanity- they're willing to kill infants in order to avoid what little responsibility they have in this world. They're beyond disgusting.
Meanwhile, the aging Boomer men on viagra laugh along at this because Feminism makes it far more difficult for younger competition to take them on. The younger men are career-crippled(in more ways than one, if it isn't Feminism- it's foreign labor or illegal aliens).

MershedPerturders says

you're only half the way there. There is no 'pseudo' feminism. The idea was flawed from the beginning. Women always worked jobs- even before feminism.

True. Women and children working was the norm, not the exception, in the nineteenth century and before, going back to at least antiquity. And the jobs women worked sucked ass -- as did the jobs men worked -- at that time ...nothing as cushy as an office job.

However, when I think of feminism, I think of the original feminist movement in the late 19th and early 20th century revolving around women having the same legal rights as men including the right to vote, own property, and sign business contracts. Granted, these issues were written about as early as 1792 in the book A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. However, it was in 1920 with the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment that ultimately answered the question of equality under law for women and fulfilled feminism.

All that came after 1920 isn't feminism even if it uses the same word for marketing purposes. I personally believe that the real feminism, the suffrage movement, is in itself so significant that the term feminism should have remained referring to that historical movement rather than being perversed by later political agendas. For example, by the definitions of the late 20th century, Susan B. Anthony would not be a feminist because she wasn't pro-choice on abortion. And I think that is utterly ridiculous.

Dan, good points but I think it remains to be seen how much of 'equality' really makes sense. While voting seems like an obvious right, the effect it had was turning our nation from a responsible republic into a tax-and-spend madhouse. It wasn't long after the Nineteenth Amendment that we got the New Deal which put us on the path to socialism.

Fact is, unless you are responsible and CULPABLE(which women are not) then you shouldn't be voting. The fact is the state is built on the notion of military might and women neither recognize nor contribute to it. While you can coddle this cherished notion of equality- the fact is the national democracies have no power in today's world, the corporations have all the power and there is no suffrage movement in the board room. Women voting was a mistake and men will lose on both an individual and collective level until they realize that.

MershedPerturders says

there are none left, they've been taxed or regulated out of existence.

AMEN!