« First « Previous Comments 83 - 122 of 189 Next » Last » Search these comments
Wow, I just checked all his reviews. As a teacher, usually, if you see a few bad reviews, its a red flag. He has dozens of pissed off students.
How many students do you think he's taught? People are more likely to go to a place like Ratemyprofessor if they want to complain. Most who are happy just don't bother. It wouldn't surprise me if one or two from here have had fun posting up a comment or two on there as well.
Most people don't bother at all. That's why, when you have a few, its usually a red flag. When that many show up, you've obviously pissed them off. I just took a look at his youtube vids, I can see why they get frustrated with him.
He didn't. They just argued a lot. If Roberto 'cyber stalked' David, then David 'cyber stalked' Roberto.
I have no idea who Bob is, nor do I care.
He's proved to be a complete troll who is now just a nut job.
So now Bigsby, are you really sure this person is all there?
I just took a look at his youtube vids, I can see why they get frustrated with him.
Why would you bother?
lol, this was my favorite review
He put problems on the board and sat down. At the end of class, he solved a few and we left. Most of the time we sat around trying to figure everything ourselves. The most hilarious thing was him always surfing on MySpace.
Now replace Myspace with patrick.net
I just took a look at his youtube vids, I can see why they get frustrated with him.
Why would you bother?
I'm a teacher, I was wondering what his teaching abilities were like.
Most people don't bother at all. That's why, when you have a few, its usually a red flag. When that many show up, you've obviously pissed them off. I just took a look at his youtube vids, I can see why they get frustrated with him.
His Financial Math videos seemed okay. Then again, I haven't taken a math class in decades.
btw, and this isn't a diss on Roberto, he looks like a perfectly, in shape, professional guy (sort of bad fashion sense though) but he looks exactly like my gay professor friend at USC.
Cool factoid: His first name is Robert, and his last name starts with an "R" as well. They even have very similar voices.
He didn't. They just argued a lot. If Roberto 'cyber stalked' David, then David 'cyber stalked' Roberto.
I have no idea who Bob is, nor do I care.
He's proved to be a complete troll who is now just a nut job.
So now Bigsby, are you really sure this person is all there?
As opposed to you?
I suppose it would be easy for someone to email his school address and ask him wtf happend.
BTW I bought a house last year and posted about it and got roasted for 'being dumb'.
Its now worth 325k more than I paid which I can back up with very recent comps but I want to be anonymous. Only Roberto, and a couple others, said 'hey this guy will probably make bank' and I did.
Roberto has the cold take on reality that Mr Spock does - he doesnt 'suffer fools lightly'.
When you are always right - people hate you. Try telling everyone you know there is no god and no afterlife and Jesus was a con artist who got the death penalty from the government for banging too many jewish girls....its true and they will hate you.
ha
As opposed to you?
Why would you care. I don't see a contest here.
It's a forum, isn't it? I can express an opinion. I've read your back and forth with Roberto. You frequently responded to posts he made that weren't directed at you. If the pair of you then indulge in a lot of arguing, which you both did, then you can hardly accuse him of cyber stalking you. You were the catalyst plenty of the time, so your complaining doesn't really wash.
cyber stalking
Forgive me, I misunderstood.
Cyber Stalking is when a person goes on the internet, to stalk some one. You, or anyone can look me up on the internet. I have nothing to hide, or fear.
Bob kept challenging me, and every one here to look him up, look up his properties, but why would anyone bother?
Why would I or anyone care?
As you say, it's a forum. I don't care who you are. I'm old enough to take what information I want, or need, and move on.
Bob was dangerous because he was encouraging people to buy property, and saying they were stupid if they didn't buy property.
I'm happy to say that I have given my clients the best advice, to not buy, and if they own, they should sell.
I could go on, but like I said, anyone, at any time, can look me up. I have a very good internet presence, actually, it's kind of what I do now. It's a learning curve.
someone calls, from out of state, and claims he posted ON PATRICK.NET that he had a gun and was going to go crazy at school...
and I'm saying that is complete BS. If anyone called it was Bob so he can get a little more drama in his life.
Welcome back, Bob!
As I said, Bob falls for it every time. He can't resist. Can't ignore and look away. Has to reply. Hilarious!!
someone calls, from out of state, and claims he posted ON PATRICK.NET that he had a gun and was going to go crazy at school...
and I'm saying that is complete BS. If anyone called it was Bob so he can get a little more drama in his life.
And you wonder why he argues with you? And what do you mean you've been advising your clients to sell or not buy? You run a cleaning company, don't you? And to say that Roberto is dangerous because he's talked about his success in Phoenix is utterly ridiculous. If the bears on here had bought back in 2011 and 2012, then most of them would have seen their properties rise in value, substantially in many cases. Clearly very, very dangerous.
yes buying property 2 years ago would have been very very bad.
Yes, Bob it would have been a mistake.
As you know the property we bought in 2006 gave us a $64K profit.
The house you keep insisting is under water already has it's money out of it, $270K, but surprise, surprise, with the work we just completed we can now sell for a slight profit more.
@Patrick, this is a very sophisticated troll. If he did call in a gun threat using your website as the catalyst, you should think about if you want him, or her here.
As much as I hate feeding a troll, it is a fascinating train wreck you have going on here.
yes buying property 2 years ago would have been very very bad.
Yes, Bob it would have been a mistake.
As you know the property we bought in 2006 gave us a $64K profit.
The house you keep insisting is under water already has it's money out of it, $270K, but surprise, surprise, with the work we just completed we can now sell for a slight profit more.
@Patrick, this is a very sophisticated troll. If he did call in a gun threat using your website as the catalyst, you should think about if you want him, or her here.
As much as I hate feeding a troll, it is a fascinating train wreck you have going on here.
He's a sophisticated troll because he boasts about his success and argues with you about your often strange posts? Hmmm...
And you should knock your gun theory on the head.
And you should knock your gun theory on the head.
This is a tough one to figure out, then Bob follows that with a comment about my right to bear arms?
@Partick, very sophisticated trolling.
2006.... such a nice time to buy a home in seattle! none better!!!
I was wrong, so sorry!
Bob, look at the graph, we sold before August 2007. In your cyber stalking you must be able to see that.
And you should knock your gun theory on the head.
This is a tough one to figure out, then Bob follows that with a comment about my right to bear arms?
@Partick, very sophisticated trolling.
?
It's official, David Losh is a moron and anyone who didn't buy a house because of him is a nimrod.
None of the data, nor economic statistics look that way.
You mean, other than the house prices?
It does??? Here is today's Case Shiller... Want to take a guess at the
direction of home prices??
Up. Anything above zero means rising prices.
You were wrong. Own it. Move on.
All you have to do is look at today's economic data to see how wrong all of you have been.
It's already unraveling.
Let me bring in this quote from an absolute Real Estate cheerleader:
"We've seen more volatility in real estate in the past five years than we have in the past 500," said Glenn Kelman, CEO of Redfin, an online real estate sales company."
That boy has venture capital at stake.
Real Estate has been a tradition safe haven investment, now it's just fodder for speculation. Big players have entered for those 6% returns, but they will be the ones moving on.
Up. Anything above zero means rising prices.
The housing oracle has already foretold that price gains shall now slow.
Just more nutty responses to clog the threads.
Is this how Darryl ended, I forget.
It does??? Here is today's Case Shiller... Want to take a guess at the direction of home prices??
Huge down movement is already happening, we just have to wait for the data to get collected as we speak. Anyone thinking of selling but waiting is a fool. Now is a much better time than later.
All you have to do is look at today's economic data to see how wrong all of
you have been.
You're seriously losing it.
The bears didn't say economic indicators would be xyz in 2013, they said prices would fall.
And prices rose. Therefore the bears (and you) are wrong.
Up. Anything above zero means rising prices.
Give it a few more months.... At that direction, it could be at zero soon.... Dropping from 1.73% down to 0.89% in two months ain't a positive direction....
The rate of increase has slowed yes. But like the oracle said, 11%/year growth is a FAR cray from falling.
I know, you have a tough time following a trend line..... See if this helps
your comprehension..
I understand fine. Any time the bar is above zero means prices are rising.
Sure, prices aren't RISING as fast as they were in March, but they are still rising at a pretty healthy clip.
Give it a few more months.... At that direction, it could be at zero soon.... Dropping from 1.73% down to 0.89% in two months ain't a positive direction....
The rate of increase has slowed yes. But like the oracle said, 11%/year growth is a FAR cray from falling.
I know, you have a tough time following a trend line..... See if this helps your comprehension..
*
What is your argument again?
Thanks Professor for getting the trolls out so we can see who they are, and how elaborate the ranting has become.
What a train wreck!
But like the oracle said
LOL, You guys must be losing it in this beginning bear market. What's next, the keymaster? ;)
LOL, You guys must be losing it in this beginning bear market. What's next,
the keymaster? ;)
This is like an alternate universe. 11%/year rise in prices is a bear market?
11%/year rise in prices is a bear market?
It's called the rusty nail.
Just because a rusty nail sells for more than it's value, doesn't change the value.
That's an extension of the golden rail road spike theory, that says not all gold rail road spikes are actually gold, some are solid gold, some are dipped in gold, and some are painted gold.
If they all sell for the same price it doesn't mean the have the same value.
You're flailing here, because Real Estate isn't something you understand.
Glenn Kelman at redfin figured that out long ago. He's been described as a snake oil sales person, and I agree.
Keep pushing the hype. I'm just glad you are all corralled here in one place.
You're flailing here, because Real Estate isn't something you understand.
I'm flailing? Really? You do live in an alternate universe.
That's an extension of the golden rail road spike theory, that says not all
gold rail road spikes are actually gold, some are solid gold, some are dipped in
gold, and some are painted gold.
If they all sell for the same price it doesn't mean the have the same
value.
That is a very poor analogy. Nobody is committing fraud on buyers.
OK, then, let's get to the crux of your argument. How do you determine "value" of housing now? What metrics are you using?
It was 23% a few months before that in March....
And it was 12% a few months before that in January. My guess is it will go back to very small rises or flat.
LOL, You guys must be losing it in this beginning bear market. What's next,
the keymaster? ;)
This is like an alternate universe. 11%/year rise in prices is a bear market?
I said "beginning", but I was more referring to the "oracle" anyways. This is rich ;)
I said "beginning", but I was more referring to the "oracle" anyways. This is
rich ;)
Wouldn't even the "beginning" of a bear market require prices to, you know, actually be falling?
So, if you say prices will drop, and they drop.... that is real
but if they go up.... that is fantasy?Hey, you can never be wrong then!!! Except that you are wrong!
Maybe a group picture?
If you could see today's data you would see they drop. Once this baby turns, it will turn fast, and I think it already is. Each day home owners are losing money at this point. Sucks to many.
« First « Previous Comments 83 - 122 of 189 Next » Last » Search these comments
no one knows