Comments 1 - 3 of 40 Next » Last » Search these comments
Its a typical reaction- stigmatize your opponents, stigmatize certain points of view -make everything that happens about YOUR issue. Politics 101 on all sides.
Of course the president is going to politicize everything- he is a politician and his job is to make sure his message resonates with those he is appealing too.
Even Paul Krugman in his Keynesian zeal couldnt resist getting in his plug for economic stimulus just three days after 9/11
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/14/opinion/reckonings-after-the-horror.html
Even Paul Krugman in his Keynesian zeal couldnt resist getting in his plug for economic stimulus just three days after 9/11
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/14/opinion/reckonings-after-the-horror.html
It seems almost in bad taste to talk about dollars and cents after an act of mass murder. Nonetheless, we must ask about the economic aftershocks from Tuesday's horror.
I got laid off from an engineering job 2 months after 9/11. The fuckers had the nerve to cite 9/11 in my pink slip letter as a driving force to the tanking economy.
I got laid off from an engineering job 2 months after 9/11. The fuckers had the nerve to cite 9/11 in my pink slip letter as a driving force to the tanking economy.
Yep companies blamed 9/11 a lot back when in many instances it was their own fault but 9/11 was convenient to blame
Comments 1 - 3 of 40 Next » Last » Search these comments
Let me get this straight. It's NOT okay to politicize gun ownership after a shooting, but it IS okay to politicize a president's response to the shooting?
Is it possible that mass murders happen so frequently in America that we are ALL becoming tone deaf to them?
http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/17/politics/obama-shooting-tone/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
#politics