patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,363,550 comments by 15,734 users - brazil66, Ceffer, HeadSet, stereotomy, TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter, WookieMan online now
White House looks to regulate cow flatulence
2014 Mar 31, 12:14am 2,069 views 19 comments
by zzyzzx follow (9)
Comments 1 - 19 of 19 Search these comments
New Renter
2014 Mar 31, 1:38am
Don't worry folks, there is a solution:
Its not what you think:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/09/07/penn-states-greenhouse-gas-solution-cow-beano/
zzyzzx
2014 Mar 31, 1:45am
What about human flatulence??
For some reason, liberals pretend that people don't fart.
Tenpoundbass
2014 Mar 31, 1:49am
Oh Boy here comes $10 milk and forget minimum wage workers flipping hamburgers. For a meat as expensive as beef as beef will be, they should only hire trained Butler staff.
zzyzzx
2014 Mar 31, 1:50am
Oh Boy here comes $10 milk and forget minimum wage workers flipping hamburgers. For a meat as expensive as beef as beef will be, they should only hire trained Butler staff.
Nope. This means that a lot of dairy farms in the US will close down and we will be eating imported beef and milk instead.
Tenpoundbass
2014 Mar 31, 1:53am
Mainland China folk go to Hong Kong, because the Milk they get in Beijing might be tainted with chemicals.
New Renter
2014 Mar 31, 1:55am
Oh Boy here comes $10 milk and forget minimum wage workers flipping hamburgers. For a meat as expensive as beef as beef will be, they should only hire trained Butler staff.
From my link:
Experiments revealed another benefit of the gas-reducing supplement. It increased daily milk production by nearly three pounds of milk for each cow during the trials. The researcher anticipated the higher milk productivity from the herd.
“Since methane production is an energy loss for the animal, this isn’t really a surprise,†Hristov said. “If you decrease energy loss, the cows can use that energy for other processes, such as making milk.â€
If this works I'd think prices would remain stable or even drop.
curious2
2014 Mar 31, 7:56am
This means that a lot of dairy farms in the US will close down and we will be eating imported beef and milk instead.
Honestly, having lived downwind of a dairy farm, I can tell you that fewer of them - or at least reducing emissions from them - would be good news. One of your earlier threads reported they produce explosive amounts of methane, and there are serious efforts to capture the methane for use as fuel. Regardless of how people feel about global climate change, methane is a significant atmospheric problem including damage to the ozone, increasing the risk of cancer. America already imports beef because Americans eat too much of it, and dairy is unhealthy for a large section of the population. Credit where it's due, if the feds reduce methane emissions and dairy consumption at the same time, it will actually be a win-win for public health (unlike Obamneycare).
@curious, you can't smell methane, but manure does stink no doubt about that.
curious2
2014 Mar 31, 9:44am
Think how many real and truly productive jobs our jobs creators will create shipping beef from China. And they still have the sense to make, uh, let children work over there anyway.
Hmm. China is trying to reduce population, and reportedly they're killing infant girls and disposing of the corpses in rivers, which causes environmental problems. Americans want to eat "beef", and they're none too particular about what's actually in their processed "beef" product. Pure methane is indeed odorless, but I smell a modest proposal...
Tenpoundbass
2014 Mar 31, 10:16am
This is a short stretch, they've been regulating Bullshit for 5 years.
zzyzzx
2014 Apr 9, 11:13pm
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/70637ed6-bece-11e3-a1bf-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2yLTOEPJ0
Scientists seek climate-friendly cow of the future
A White House climate initiative has boosted a quixotic search for the “cow of the futureâ€, a next-generation creature whose greenhouse gas emissions would be cut by anti-methane pills, burp scanners and gas backpacks.
Carbon dioxide from fossil fuels is the primary man-made gas warming the planet, but methane is far more potent and the US’s biggest source of it is its 88m cattle, which produce more than landfill sites, natural gas leaks or hydraulic fracturing.
The Obama administration’s launch last month of a plan to curb methane emissions has given fresh relevance to climate-friendly technologies for cattle that range from dietary supplements and DNA gut tests to strap-on gas tanks.
Juan Tricarico, director of the Cow of the Future project at the Innovation Center for US Dairy, an Illinois research institute, said the initiative had boosted his quest to create the “star athlete†of the bovine world.
“For us it is very encouraging because it basically demonstrates that important players out there are thinking in similar ways to us,†he told the Financial Times.
But he said there were common misconceptions about where cattle methane comes from. “Ninety-seven per cent of all the methane gas is released by the front end through burps, not from the back end,†he said.
Based on his research priorities, the dairy cow of the future will be the unstressed inhabitant of spacious accommodation, munching on anti-methane gourmet grains that are processed by an efficient, best-in-species digestive system.
“We want it to be more productive, we want it to be healthier, we want it to be a problem-free cow,†said Mr Tricarico.
Methane accounts for 9 per cent of US greenhouse gas emissions and does not linger in the air as long as CO2, but it has a global warming effect more than 20 times greater than CO2, the White House says.
However, financial barriers are hampering the adoption of tools to limit methane from cattle, as was the case with early technology to curb pollution from power stations and motor vehicles.
The costs are prohibitive for dairy and beef farmers and the kind of research that could make the tools more cost-effective would require public funding.
C-Lock, a South Dakota company, sells a feeding station that gives animals dietary supplements such as basil to cut methane production and measures the content of their breath by pulling it towards trace gas sensors with a vacuum.
Patrick Zimmerman, C-Lock’s founder, says prices start at $45,000 but stresses the economic benefits of improved efficiency. “Of the energy the animals eat, 3 to 15 per cent is lost as methane and that’s a waste,†he says.
At Argentina’s National Institute of Agricultural Technology, scientists have created backpacks that collect gas via tubes plugged into cows’ stomachs. A typical animal emits 250-300 litres of methane a day and researchers say this could be used to power a car or a refrigerator for a day, but Jorge Antonio Hilbert of the institute says the tanks’ use on a large scale is “totally improbableâ€.
Jonathan Gelbard of the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental group, says: “Anyone who can come up with a cost-effective way to harness that methane is going to make a lot of money.â€
Ilmi Granoff of the Overseas Development Institute said an alternative to controlling cattle emissions would be to cut the number of cows.
How about cutting the number of people?
“Forget coal, Forget cars. The fastest way to address climate change would be to dramatically reduce the amount of meat people eat,†he said. “But that involves cultural preferences and they are difficult to touch.â€
Comments 1 - 19 of 19 Search these comments
http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/28/white-house-looks-to-regulate-cow-flatulence-as-part-of-climate-agenda/
As part of its plan to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, the Obama administration is targeting the dairy industry to reduce methane emissions in their operations.
This comes despite falling methane emission levels across the economy since 1990.
The White House has proposed cutting methane emissions from the dairy industry by 25 percent by 2020. Although U.S. agriculture only accounts for about 9 percent of the country's greenhouse gas emissions, according to the Environmental Protection Agency, it makes up a sizeable portion of methane emissions — which is a very potent greenhouse gas.
Some of these methane emissions come from cow flatulence, exhaling and belching — other livestock animals release methane as well.
“Cows emit a massive amount of methane through belching, with a lesser amount through flatulence,” according to How Stuff Works. “Statistics vary regarding how much methane the average dairy cow expels. Some experts say 100 liters to 200 liters a day… while others say it's up to 500 liters… a day. In any case, that's a lot of methane, an amount comparable to the pollution produced by a car in a day.”
“Of all domestic animal types, beef and dairy cattle were by far the largest emitters of [methane],” according to an EPA analysis charting greenhouse gas emissions in 2012. Cows and other animals produce methane through digestion, which ferments the food of animals.
“During digestion, microbes resident in an animal's digestive system ferment food consumed by the animal,” the EPA notes. “This microbial fermentation process, referred to as enteric fermentation, produces [methane] as a byproduct, which can be exhaled or eructated by the animal.”
#politics