Comments 1 - 9 of 9 Search these comments
"In 1936, a dense, difficult-to-read academic book appeared that seemed to tell politicians they could do exactly what they wanted to do. This was Keynes’s General Theory. Piketty’s book serves the same purpose in 2014, and serves the same short-sighted, destructive policies."
Please post a picture of your personal copies of "General Theory" and "Capital in the Twenty-first Century." Includes a post-it note on each with your screen name, indigenous.
There might be a significant difference between what indigenous thinks of each, and what indigenous read on mises.org of what he should think of each.
Thanks.
There might be a significant difference between what indigenous thinks of each, and what indigenous read on mises.org of what he should think of each.
And what might those be?
Read the actual books and tell me what you think.
No thanks, I could suggest you do the same with Rothbard.
I can see the result of Keynes ideas, that is enough for me.
I can see the result of Keynes ideas, that is enough for me.
Your obsession with Keynes is odd.
Your obsession with Keynes is odd
As is your complacency with him, on the other hand your complacency is ubiquitous.
Your obsession with Keynes is odd
As is your complacency with him, on the other hand your complacency is ubiquitous.
You must be short. Stuff goes right over your head.
Or not. He could be tall, but just dense so that it all fails to sink in.
sbh is short quite often...
http://mises.org/daily/6736/Thomas-Piketty-on-Inequality-and-Capital