3
0

Early 401(k) withdrawal replaces homes as American piggy bank


               
2014 May 6, 12:26am   1,227 views  11 comments

by zzyzzx   follow (9)  

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/early-tap-401-k-replaces-040006302.html

Premature withdrawals from retirement accounts have become America's new piggy bank, cracked open in record amounts during lean times by people like Cindy Cromie, who needed the money to rent a U-Haul and start a new life.

Her employer, the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, had outsourced Cromie's medical transcription work. Cromie said the move cut her income by as much as 60 percent, at times leaving her with minimum-wage pay.

So, last year, at age 56, she moved about 90 miles from her home in Edinboro, Pennsylvania, into her mother's basement. To make ends meet as she moved and then quit the job, Cromie pulled out $2,767 from her retirement savings.

"We made two trips and it just got to be real expensive," she said. "That money, it was a security that I needed."

Still unemployed, Cromie is trying to avoid tapping what's left of her retirement savings -- $7,000 that would be subject to taxes and a 10 percent extra penalty if she touches it in the next two to three years, before she turns 59 1/2.

It's a small number that's part of a much larger picture: The Internal Revenue Service collected $5.7 billion in 2011 from penalties, meaning that Americans took out about $57 billion from retirement funds before they were supposed to.

The median size of a 401(k) is $24,400 as of March 31, with people older than 55 having $65,300, according to Fidelity Investments. Those funds can disappear quickly in retirement, and the early withdrawals indicate that the coming retirement crisis could be even more acute than expected.
‘Most Vulnerable'

"They get hit with the penalty at exactly the time when they're the most vulnerable," said Reid Cramer, director of the Asset Building Program at the New America Foundation, which tries to improve savings for lower-income families. "So it's a real double-whammy."

For decades, Americans' homes were their piggy banks. As values rose, they refinanced or took out second mortgages. Since the housing collapse of 2008, that's often no longer an option. Taking money from a 401(k) -- and worrying about the consequences later -- became a more attractive alternative and a record number of Americans made early withdrawals in 2010.
Collecting Penalties

Adjusted for inflation, the government collects 37 percent more money from early-withdrawal penalties than it did in 2003. Meanwhile, the amount of home-equity loans outstanding was $704 billion in 2013, down 38 percent from the 2007 peak, according to Federal Reserve data.

"They didn't have access to the home equity that they had in the past," Cramer said. "And families looked around for what was left and they actually drained the value from the 401(k)."

In 2011, 5.7 million tax returns, or about 4 percent of all U.S. households, reported paying penalties on early withdrawals. The government collected more than enough money from these penalties to fund the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

As economic conditions deteriorate, such withdrawals spike, as they did in 1991, 2002 and 2007. The inflation-adjusted penalty collections declined 5 percent in 2011, the last year for which complete data is available.
‘In Hardship'

"You have this kind of Catch-22," said Karen Friedman, executive vice president and policy director at the Pension Rights Center, a Washington-based consumer group. "On the one hand, the penalty is meant to discourage people from taking the money out. At a time when millions of families are in hardship, they're more likely to take that money out."

Under U.S. law, money in tax-deferred retirement accounts can be removed without penalty after age 59 1/2 and generally must be withdrawn starting after age 70 1/2.

Withdrawals, at any age, are added to a taxpayer's income and taxed at regular rates. The extra 10 percent penalty for 401(k) plans applies to early withdrawals, except in cases of disability and certain medical expenses.

And withdrawals from individual retirement accounts have a broader set of exceptions to the penalty, including spending for higher education and first-time home-buying.

The people who pay the penalty include younger workers who switch jobs and don't bother to roll over their accounts and older workers who have no place else to turn.

A Federal Reserve study last year found that in 2010, 9.3 percent of taxpayers with retirement accounts or pensions were penalized, up from 7.9 percent in 2004.
Cash-Out Rates

Younger workers ages 20 to 39 have the highest cash-out rates, with about 40 percent taking money with them when they switch jobs, according to data from Fidelity, the largest administrator of 401(k) plans.

"The pervasive thinking is, 'Why bother rolling over $2,500? The taxes and penalties aren't that daunting,'" said Michael Branham, a financial planner at Cornerstone Wealth Advisors in Edina, Minnesota. "What's missing is the longer-term thinking in that decision-making process."

A 30-year-old who cashes out $16,000 could lose $471 a month in retirement income cash flow by not leaving it invested in a retirement account, assuming retirement at age 67 and death at age 93, according to a Fidelity analysis. That scenario assumed a 4.7 percent annual return and a 401(k) balance at retirement of $87,500.

Depending on the rules of an employer's 401(k) plan, workers may be able to borrow from their retirement accounts and pay the loan back with interest, without incurring the tax penalty.
Borrowing Rules

Workers generally may borrow as much as 50 percent of their vested account balance up to a maximum of $50,000, according to the Internal Revenue Service.

The loan must be repaid within five years, unless the money was used to buy a primary residence. There's a risk with taking a loan because most 401(k) plans require employees to repay loans in full when leaving a job, usually within 60 days.

Some withdrawals of money from Roth IRAs and 401(k)s, funded with post-tax money, can avoid penalties. Withdrawals of tax-advantaged earnings are typically subject to the penalty.

Congress, retirement experts and administration officials who are concerned about early withdrawals have two suggestions, totally at odds with each other: Lower the penalties or raise them. More restrictive rules might prevent people from putting money in retirement accounts in the first place, while lighter limits would make them more likely to take the money out.
Obama's Proposal

During the 2008 campaign, President Barack Obama proposed allowing penalty-free withdrawals of up to $10,000 from retirement accounts. That idea went nowhere and wasn't included in the 2009 economic stimulus.

In 2012, the New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants proposed a temporary waiver of the penalties while families were recovering from the recession.

"The reality is people are going to do it, OK?" said Jonathan Horn, a New York accountant who helped write the proposal. "And if someone needs that money, the 10 percent is not stopping them."

Moving in the opposite direction is House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp, a Michigan Republican. In his 2014 draft plan to revamp the U.S. tax code, Camp proposed repealing the penalty exceptions for higher education and first-time home purchases, contending that the changes would encourage Americans not to tap their retirement accounts early.
Warning Employees

Costco Wholesale Corp. tells workers about the dangers of dipping into their accounts and urges them not to, said Patrick Callans, senior vice president of human resources at the Issaquah, Washington-based retailer. Costco has about 103,000 employees.

"Educating employees about the plan -- and the benefits of saving for retirement -- is good for employees and good for Costco," Callans wrote in a letter to the company's management teams in April, emphasizing that the company wants people to have enough saved when it comes time to retire.

The company doesn't prohibit withdrawals because executives see it as the workers' decisions.

"We try to be employee-friendly and much of it is the employees' money," Callans said.

Cindy Cromie, who worked with the Service Employees International Union to respond to the outsourcing, is now 57 and still jobless. She's trying to avoid tapping her remaining retirement account.

"I'm hoping that I can just leave it as it is until I do get a job," she said.

In the meantime, she's applying for civil service jobs that she hopes can help her rebuild her cushion.

"It's just a worry that I have every day," she said. "I have this pit in my stomach."

#housing

Comments 1 - 11 of 11        Search these comments

1   casandra   @   2014 May 6, 12:29am  

Good for Cromie, she found out she's an heiress with still an additional 7k left untouched !

2   casandra   @   2014 May 6, 12:35am  

so if folks are taking out roughly 57 billion a year from their 401ks each and every year, and that number is probably rising, only a few will ever have any kind of 401 k savings for its intended use, retirement.

that means social security will be the only form of retirement for these poor slobs who worked all their stupid lives for a meager existence.

retirement will be only surviving for them, no golden girl years here folks !!

3   zzyzzx   @   2014 May 6, 1:37am  

casandra says

that means social security will be the only form of retirement for these poor slobs

It means that they will be working until they drop dead. It's the new American Dream.

4   zzyzzx   @   2014 May 6, 2:18am  

Another article on the same subject:
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/most-retirees-fail-to-have-an-income-plan-2014-05-06

Most retirees fail to have an income plan

Among retirees who are withdrawing money from their retirement accounts, about half of them are doing it without a strategy in place, according to a new survey. That doesn’t bode well for their long-term retirement success.

Fifty-two percent of retirees surveyed said they’re pulling money out of their retirement accounts simply “as the need arises,” according to the telephone survey of 1,206 adults aged 35 to 75, conducted for PNC, a financial-services firm.

“It’s an unfortunate fact that a lot of people don’t prepare for retirement and they find themselves in a situation without this plan in place,” said Joe Jennings, investment director for PNC Wealth Management in Baltimore, Md.

The danger is running out of money later, when you’re much older and least able to rectify the situation. Perhaps unsurprisingly, about half of the retirees surveyed said they’re worried about exactly that — running out of money — and 63% are concerned that Social Security or pensions won’t cover their retirement expenses.

Also unsurprising: Those who are concerned about outliving their savings have less money. The survey found that their investable assets total $225,000 on average, compared with the $411,000 possessed by the more optimistic retirees.

Spend less, plan more

There is one straightforward way to improve your outlook, no matter what your age: Cut expenses. Among the 53% of retirees who said running out of money is a fear, 59% said they are spending less and 41% said they’re budgeting more carefully.

While 35% of retirees said they’re spending about what they expected to spend in retirement, another 31% had no specific expectations — another sign that people are entering retirement with no clear sense of their finances.

Note that this is a small survey and, while the margin of error for the overall sample is +/- 3 percentage points, it rises to +/- 6 percentage points for the subgroup of retirees. Still, the findings point to the fact that some retirees entered retirement without a plan, and are trying to adjust on the go.

People should start thinking about retirement long before they retire, Jennings said.

“Ideally, what we would recommend is if you know that retirement is coming down the road in the not-too-distant future, let’s work on a plan to project what your income is going to be, what your expenses are going to be, and then start following that model today, even though you’re not retired yet, just so you know how it feels and whether it’s going to work for you,” Jennings said.

In other words, while you’re still working, figure out what your retirement income is likely to be, and then try living on that, while you’re still working.

“It’s a test run,” he said. “If there are going to be adjustments to be made we want to make them before retirement occurs rather than after retirement occurs and you may have less flexibility.”

How to create retirement income

So, what are your options for creating income from your retirement savings? There’s no one right way for everybody. The best strategy for you will depend on your specific financial situation, including the tax implications of where your savings are sitting (e.g. a pre-tax IRA or an after-tax Roth IRA), how long you expect to live, whether you’re hoping to leave money to heirs, and other considerations.

A central question you’ll need to answer is asset allocation: what mix of stocks and bonds is going to generate enough money to live on for the rest of your life?

If you’re confused, take some comfort from the fact that even the experts debate the ground rules. While a common rule of thumb has been to invest your age in bonds and 100-minus-your-age in stocks, that rule may be upended by long-term trends, including the prospect of higher interest rates slamming bonds, as well as longer life spans. Now that retirement may last 25 or 30 years, you may want to retain a higher portion in stocks, some advisers say.

One recent study found that pre-retirees should shift towards bonds as retirement approaches — and then add more to stocks as they progress through retirement. That initial shift to bonds reduces “sequence of returns” risk — the risk that you’ll never be able to recover from a big hit to your investments early in retirement, when your portfolio is at its largest.

Social Security benefits are a key piece of income for most retirees, and whether or not to delay benefits is a matter of some debate. Delaying benefits up to age 70 provides a permanently higher monthly benefit — benefits rise about 8% a year up to age 70. (If you’re married, note that there are numerous strategies to consider, and many entail one spouse claiming early.)

Most financial advisers with whom I speak suggest that delaying makes sense for anyone who has a reasonable chance of living a long life. Some experts take it one step further: They say that, in some cases, early in retirement retirees should focus solely on other income sources — for example, tapping their investment accounts, even up to the point of depleting them — if it will allow them to delay Social Security.

This strategy provides a form of insurance against a longer life, and may also reduce your total tax bill in retirement. Read more about this strategy in my story: Best ways to tap retirement investment accounts

No matter what retirement-income strategy you end up employing, revisit it regularly. “It’s not something you can put into place when you enter into retirement and then never revisit it again. You do have to review it at least annually,” Jennings said.

5   Strategist   @   2014 May 6, 3:58am  

I know a couple who took out $90,000 out of their 401K, paid the penalty and taxes just to buy a BMW.
You and me are gonna be supporting this wise couple when they retire.
Whose fault is it Zzyzzx?

6   zzyzzx   @   2014 May 6, 4:12am  

Strategist says

Whose fault is it Zzyzzx?

It's all Obama's fault!!!

7   dublin hillz   @   2014 May 6, 4:30am  

Strategist says

I know a couple who took out $90,000 out of their 401K, paid the penalty and taxes just to buy a BMW.
You and me are gonna be supporting this wise couple when they retire.
Whose fault is it Zzyzzx?

Maybe they are planning to live it up and on the day that money runs out they will drive the car off the cliff...

8   Ceffer   @   2014 May 6, 4:52am  

WalMart is installing incinerators to cremate their elderly employees on the spot when they collapse in situ.

9   dublin hillz   @   2014 May 6, 4:59am  

Ceffer says

WalMart is installing incinerators to cremate their elderly employees on the spot when they collapse in situ.

They should turn it into Great America's halloween haunt on the daily.

10   zzyzzx   @   2014 May 6, 5:23am  

Ceffer says

WalMart is installing incinerators to cremate their elderly employees on the spot when they collapse in situ.

That's called an employee benefit. All large employers should offer it.

11   Strategist   @   2014 May 6, 8:00am  

dublin hillz says

Strategist says

I know a couple who took out $90,000 out of their 401K, paid the penalty and taxes just to buy a BMW.

You and me are gonna be supporting this wise couple when they retire.

Whose fault is it Zzyzzx?

Maybe they are planning to live it up and on the day that money runs out they will drive the car off the cliff...

I hope so.

Comments 1 - 11 of 11        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste