Comments 1 - 2 of 2 Search these comments
1
bob2356
2014 Jun 16, 10:41pm
There is no right to bare arms
bare arms are gross. long sleeve shirts should have been in the constitution.
2
bob2356
2014 Jun 16, 10:46pm
THE 2nd AMENDMENT IS JUST A MEME!!!!!!!!
Meme...
My little Meme.
The sun shines east-- the sun shines west--
I know where-- the sun shines best!
It's on my Meme I'm talkin' about, nobody else's!
My little Meme,
My heartstrings are tangled around Alabeme.
Meme-- Meme, I'm comin'--
I'm so sorry that I made you wait!
Meme-- Meme, I'm comin'!
Oh God, I hope I'm not late!
Look at me, Meme! Don't you know me?
I'm your little baby!
I'd walk a million miles
For one of your smiles,
My Meme!
Al Jolson
There may be on paper, but not in practice.
Here's an example.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/video-of-swat-standoff-with-open-carrier-why-dont-you-fcking-shoot-me/
Now, you may think this guy should not be allowed to carry a gun, but that's besides the point. The fact is the police arrested him for openly carrying a gun. Sure, they said they were arresting him for jaywalking and it had nothing to do with him possessing a gun, but that's the biggest sack of bullshit ever said. He was surrounded by a swat team for carrying a gun, not for jaywalking.
The fact is that selective enforcement of arbitrary laws allows the government to arrest any person at any time for any reason. This guy was arrested, not for what he did, but because the cops didn't want -- right or wrong --this particular guy to be carrying a gun. Maybe they made the right call, but only if you accept that there is no right to carry a gun. It's a privilege.
The fact is that if it were a right to carry a gun, not in paper but in practice, then it not a lawful order to surrender your weapon. If it is lawful for the police to order you at penalty of crimes of resisting and obstructing, then you don't have a right to bare guns. That's a direct contradiction. You cannot square that circle.
#crime