Comments 1 - 40 of 57 Next » Last » Search these comments
Yes an unimpeachable source of information. A more snide flavor of entertainment than Jon Stewart.
Yes an unimpeachable source of information. A more snide flavor of entertainment than Jon Stewart.
Translation: Yep, we conservatives are caught in our lies. I can't refute anything in the video, so let me just dismiss it offhand and hope no one watches it.
Translation: I have no case.
No his comments are so inane they are not worth arguing about.
Translation: I have no case.
No his comments are so inane they are not worth arguing about.
That never stopped anyone from arguing with you.
I've got to believe CIC and indig are the same person. Their comments come in pairs a few minutes apart way too frequently to be random.
I've got to believe CIC and indig are the same person. Their comments come in pairs a few minutes apart way too frequently to be random.
Also, neither of them is capable of being funny no matter how hard they try.
Also, neither of them is capable of being funny no matter how hard they try.
Case in point...
I've got to believe Dan and bob are the same person. Their comments come in pairs a few minutes apart way too frequently to be random.
Even their screen names are the same, 3 letters followed by 4 numbers.... What are the odds of that?
That never stopped anyone from arguing with you.
My comments are not inane. I think I would be able to win a debate with Bill Maher quite easily as he is a comedian, not an economist.
That never stopped anyone from arguing with you.
My comments are not inane. I think I would be able to win a debate with Bill Maher quite easily as he is a comedian, not an economist.
Ah, the foolishness of underestimating one's opponent...
Even their screen names are the same, 3 letters followed by 4 numbers.... What are the odds of that?
Clearly a sign of a conspiracy, bgamall4 what say you?
Ah, the foolishness of underestimating one's opponent...
I don't think so...
You're welcome to prove it by refuting the statement's in the video in the original post. Talk is cheap.
Did you see how wonky Dan's arm was in his avatar??
As wonky as conservative ideology?
Also, neither of them is capable of being funny no matter how hard they try.
i don't think so, I would say CIC or errc have by far and away the best sense of humor. Literally LOL a distant 3rd would be AF.
Bill Maher is never LOL in all fairness Stewart and Colbert are funny, they are just economically illiterate and they play to the biggest audience.
Also, neither of them is capable of being funny no matter how hard they try.
i don't think so, I would say CIC or errc have by far and away the best sense of humor. Literally LOL a distant 3rd would be AF.
This coming from someone who believes Sarah Palin is fit to be president. 'nuff said.
You're welcome to prove it by refuting the statement's in the video in the original post.
I will look at it but I don't have a lot of extra time these days.
You're welcome to prove it by refuting the statement's in the video in the original post.
I will look at it but I don't have a lot of extra time these days.
Says the guy who spends all day polluting Patrick.net with right-wing propaganda.
This coming from someone who believes Sarah Palin is fit to be president. 'nuff said.
This from someone who thinks Warren would be a good one.
I don't recall saying Palin would be good for Prez she does't have the experience but certainly would do better than Obama or Warren. You see we do not need another pseudo intellectual. We just need someone who is honest.
Did you see how wonky Dan's arm was in his avatar??
As wonky as conservative ideology?
No, as wonky as your thought processes are.
Feel free to challenge any on my ideas in an open debate. Any time, any place.
Funny you mention that, I'm STILL waiting for that list of accomplishments from Dan showing us why Warren is qualified to be president... It's been days and I still haven't seen a single accomplishment from him.
That is his debating style. They teach it over at Possum U or PU for short.
Although, he would make a great wheel chock for my truck
See what I mean that is funny, I don't care who you are.
I think I would be able to win a debate with Bill Maher quite easily as he is a comedian, not an economist.
I'm sure you could "win" a debate with anyone. No one else on the planet defines winning as ignoring everything said and generally playing stupid, but for you it would be a win. .
I think I would be able to win a debate with Bill Maher quite easily as he is a comedian, not an economist.
I'm sure you could "win" a debate with anyone. No one else on the planet defines winning as ignoring everything said and generally playing stupid, but for you it would be a win. .
He wins by simply engaging his opponent. Its called trolling
Opening sentence:
"Finally there's been an uproar over all the neocons who lied about the iraq war...."
So, which neocons 'lied' about the Iraq war, and what was the lie?
( don't go near WMD's, as that was universally accepted by everyone and the evidence was generated by multiple sources inside and outside the USA )
this is damning evidence....
Even their screen names are the same, 3 letters followed by 4 numbers.... What are the odds of that?
This is a statement of fact.
Why would you think it should be "funny" in the first place??
Also, neither of them is capable of being funny no matter how hard they try.
Case in point...
I've got to believe Dan and bob are the same person. Their comments come in pairs a few minutes apart way too frequently to be random.
Even their screen names are the same, 3 letters followed by 4 numbers.... What are the odds of that?
I disagree.
Maher is funny to watch, I tivo the show all episodes.
The funniest scenes occur when one of his conservative guests take him to town over one of his stoned dilated pupil moments...
Bill Maher is never LOL in all fairness Stewart and Colbert are funny, they are just economically illiterate and they play to the biggest audience.
OTOH, what if Dan and CIC are the same person, setting each other up for the kill, depending on which Shirley Mason was typing?
If Palin was president we'd be in the middle of WWIII....
I don't recall saying Palin would be good for Prez she does't have the experience but certainly would do better than Obama or Warren. You see we do not need another pseudo intellectual. We just need someone who is honest.
This means nothing coming from a liberal, as Obama has set the standard for defining "open debates", something he promised but never came close to delivering on.
Feel free to challenge any on my ideas in an open debate.
tautology
A tautology is a statement that's always true. Yes, that does describe my posts.
The opposite of a tautology is a contradiction, a statement that is always false. That perfectly describes your posts.
I can see why conservatives hate tautologies. The truth is their enemy.
This means nothing coming from a liberal, as Obama has
The fact that you consider Obama to be a liberal shows that you have your head up your ass.
A tautology is a statement that's always true. Yes, that does describe my posts.
The opposite of a tautology is a contradiction, a statement that is always false. That perfectly describes your posts.
I can see why conservatives hate tautologies. The truth is their enemy.
No dumb ass, you have the wrong definition, the definition you are referring to is used in logic, something you are not in same zip code as...
The definition that I'm referring to is when the same idea is repeated with different words, so as to imply truth.
Obama to be a liberal
You consider him to be a communist?
Only an idiot would think that one has to be either a liberal or a communist. That's taking stupidity to a whole new level.
The definition that I'm referring to is when the same idea is repeated with different words, so as to imply truth.
One, you don't get to make up your own definitions.
Two, you're thinking of Fox News. I present evidence, which you then ignore. Fox News repeats lies even after they've been debunked. That was the whole point of this thread. It's what Bill Maher calls "zombie lies". The fact that you didn't make that connection just shows how divorced from reality you are.
I'm pretty sure Bob is a unique (possibly real) individual with some good and some sock puppet ideas. He keeps you wondering
Bob is very real, quite colorful, and definitely one of a kind, many people have told me so.
Remember in Patton when he screams at his staff let no man come back alive and his aid says sometimes they don't know if you are serious or not. Patton said "It's not important that they know, it's only important that I know".
I endeavor to continue to keep you guessing.
Now Dan is an advanced form of AI programmed to spew Petabytes of data. He gives thorough insightful analysis with a liberal bent and the twisted logic of the programming team that created him.
Sounds like a complement to me.
Comments 1 - 40 of 57 Next » Last » Search these comments
http://www.RcAsyrL1LSU
Bill's been reading Patrick.net.