« First « Previous Comments 241 - 253 of 253 Search these comments
I think the OP is a bit of a misogynist.
If a man loves women but dislikes AMERICAN women, does that make him a misogynist? Just askin...
Saying anything negative about women, even constructive criticism of a small subset of them, gets you labeled a misogynist in this country.
Forget about labels, protect your wallet. Let the label makers have their field day, since they can't do much else.
Furthermore, quite a few men would like to keep the money and be the primary caretaker, because despite the effort of raising a kid, they can at least enjoy their kid for the money they pay, but they have no say in this decision at all and often are granted measly visitors rights. They'd gladly take the kid(s) if they had a choice.
This is institutionalized sexism. There is not a shred of scientific evidence that men are inferior parents to women.
Unless a woman is breastfeeding, there is no excuse why women should get automatic primary custody.
More female privilege.
Especially when it comes to male children.
This is institutionalized sexism. There is not a shred of scientific evidence that men are inferior parents to women.
Where the problem lies is with YOU and other men who LACK the ability to separate the bad ones from the good ones.
you sound like an expert in dating. i hope you are more skilled there than you are in real estate.
Look, the trick to woman hunting is to get them from rural areas where they have old fashioned values, probably some kind of religion that requires them to be reasonable, and know that the man rules the house. Plenty of these women around, but BOY are they hard to find! It's because they won't be in the usual places. You'll have to get creative, maybe join a church or a 4-H program to find them.
Otherwise you'll have to do something like I did. Marry a beautiful, highly intelligent, highly motivated woman, and then try like mad to hang on for the ride of your life! It's my second job, I swear.
Look, the trick to woman hunting is to get them from rural areas where they have old fashioned values, probably some kind of religion that requires them to be reasonable, and know that the man rules the house. Plenty of these women around, but BOY are they hard to find! It's because they won't be in the usual places. You'll have to get creative, maybe join a church or a 4-H program to find them.
Is this the song for that ideal, "Dream Weaver" ...
This entire thread is horseshit of the highest order from bitter and twisted men. The plural of anecdote isn't data. All the women in my family had kids and no comestic surgery. No tattoos either. If locally born women were really turned into sterile Barbies by feminism, that would have happened in the bra-burning 60's and most of the posters wouldn't be here.
These bitter, twisted, infantile, ego locked, whimpering, sex battered misogynists need some radical therapy.
I think the OP is a bit of a misogynist.
If a man loves women but dislikes AMERICAN women, does that make him a misogynist? Just askin...
Saying anything negative about women, even constructive criticism of a small subset of them, gets you labeled a misogynist in this country.
Forget about labels, protect your wallet. Let the label makers have their field day, since they can't do much else.
Agreed. It's a defensive mechanism to make oneself feel better, so no hard feelings ;) Now Ceffer is onto something here - p p p punish me!
Like the classic "honey, do I look fat in these pants?"
Appropriate response:
It's the fat that makes you look fat!!!
Get snipped before you have sex. Then you have nothing to worry about. Isn't that a choice?
That's pretty much your best choice right now yes.
Some people should have spent at least 2 minutes looking at the source of where this came from to begin with and who was saying what was being said in the interview.
So, why don't you write one of your multi-page dissertation and explain it to us... Make sure to blame the GOP in it so you can be consistent in your rants!!
I'm un-ignoring you temporarily but why don't you actually go do a quick wiki on the source of the comments made? It has nothing to do with the GOP. This post serves no purpose. Its based on nothing more than gross generalization.
« First « Previous Comments 241 - 253 of 253 Search these comments
"The modern women can no longer cook, they no longer want children and they are no longer warm, tidy and loving creatures who think spending time with their family is a good thing. They are probably too "independent" and "strong" to even have a family of their own. The only thing modern women have to offer men today is sex. So instead of being loving housewives who cook and raise children, they are reduced to being sexual objects only - and they are so messed up emotionally and intellectually that they often spend most of the money they make on their jobs on plastic surgery, cosmetics and tons of clothes they think will make them look good, in a desperate attempt to stay or become more attractive. Well, they have no other qualities attractive to men, so what else can we expect? This is the fruit of feminism. The fruit of "women's liberation"."
http://www.peterbe.com/plog/interview-with-Varg-Vikernes