patrick.net

I see what you mean, reminds me of the democrats.

indigenous says

I see what you mean, reminds me of the democrats.

Cause Democrats base environmental policy on the Bible? I guess things remind you of their opposites.

Dan8267 says

Cause Democrats base environmental policy on the Bible? I guess things remind you of their opposites.

I just think these guys should be required to be sober before they go on the show, Democrats although more sober are just as idiotic.

"We have to pass it to find out what is in it", type shit

indigenous says

Democrats although more sober are just as idiotic.

There is nothing more idiotic than basing policy on the Bible.

A very short book.

Dan8267 says

There is nothing more idiotic than basing policy on the Bible.

Your disrespect of other people's religion is tantamount to someone disrespecting your belief that sexual preference should be respected, no diff.

indigenous says

Your disrespect of other people's religion is tantamount to someone disrespecting your belief that sexual preference should be respected, no diff.

Huge difference. A book that advocates murder of innocents is a bad source of morality. When Muslims "honor kill" their daughters for being raped, moral outrage is the correct response. When Christians shout out "God hates fags" at the funerals of soldiers, moral outrage is the correct response.

A system of lies, no matter how popular or how much some people devoutly believe in those lies, should not be respected.

In contrast, the marriage equality movement is about civil and human rights. To equate gay bashing with logical arguments disproving religion and pointing out the harm it does, particularly when religion infiltrates secular governments, is utterly ridiculous and completely different.

You equate a very small percentage of religious zealots with an entire religion, that makes sense, NOT.

Liberal believers enable Nutcases by keeping God and his Bronze Age Bonzer authored books alive.

Case in point: Let's say Jesus was the Original Hippie. The Medieval Church, the Orangemen, and assorted Phelps (who I think is running a scam to provoke then sue under 1st Amendment), etc. all grew from those Jesus teachings anyway.

The #1 recruiting ground for religious fruitcake orgs isn't atheists, it's former liberal sect members.

thunderlips11 says

Phelps

What is that?

indigenous says

You equate a very small percentage of religious zealots with an entire religion, that makes sense, NOT.

1/3rd of Americans. That's large enough, especially when they write laws based on their false religion.