patrick.net

I don't wish ill will on Kirk, and he's entitled to his opinion but what the fuck is he going on about?

I have had an unusual career and did exactly the opposite of what this guy says.

I did what was interesting and sometimes lucrative; I didn't do anything thinking about how to "protect and provide" for some woman and her (or my) kids.

I told girls on dates what I was doing if they asked me, but I didn't tell them I had grandiose ideas about protecting them.

Now they are seeking my company; I still do the same things.

Friday I was scuba diving and surrounded by (harmless) sharks near Jupiter Florida, not far from Tiger Wood's house.

Soon I'll be exploring back roads in Baja with a 4x4 truck; girls probably won't be coming along at first. I will see them after I get back to town and will buy them lunch or dinner somewhere.

Women want a protector; men want pussy. I guess Charlie forgot that part of human nature.

He’s coming from the angle of what’s good for society, children and morality. Not juding you but, I get the sense those things aren’t that important to you.

Evidently it's "good for society" to live one's life to reproduce and hang around a fat wife after you've lost interest in her sexually, while paying richly for the experience.

Morality has absolutely nothing to do with what he spoke about; I'm not immoral, I just don't take my orders from others unless a judge or a cop.

The my GF has different political beliefs is a good one.

clambo says

Evidently it's "good for society" to live one's life to reproduce and hang around a fat wife after you've lost interest in her sexually, while paying richly for the experience.

Morality has absolutely nothing to do with what he spoke about; I'm not immoral, I just don't take my orders from others unless a judge or a cop.

It is good for society otherwise mankind would go extinct, but not everybody needs to have kids. Also generally childless men do better in life / are happier than childless womyn.

clambo says

Evidently it's "good for society" to live one's life to reproduce and hang around a fat wife after you've lost interest in her sexually, while paying richly for the experience.

Morality has absolutely nothing to do with what he spoke about; I'm not immoral, I just don't take my orders from others unless a judge or a cop.

Would you say you’re living the Christian lifestyle? Again, not judging you. Charlie is coming from the Christian perspective which, btw, has created arguably the greatest society on earth. It is now deteriorating because satanic forces are being put forth and being accepted.

Charlie wasn't old enough to be an arbiter of either politics, psychology, morality, behavior or human nature. He was a scripted agent. By whom and for what, I have no idea because I haven't seen the deep dive. He just wasn't old enough to have wisdom. Of course, he looked a lot older than what they claim, so maybe the agent was older playing younger.

Nobody gets these enormously expensive media vehicles if they are not an agent. Same is true of Fuentes. He is probably just another disguised bloodline lawn ornament being given his multimillion dollar training wheels forum by Mumsy and Dadsy to launch him into the public perception.

You see a few of these type jugend spawns of shadow elites on Gateway Pundit, too, getting their training wheels in media. Most of them are assholes out of the gate because their parents are assholes. They are like the 22 year old script writers in Hollywood whose work product are recycled garbage devoid of depth. They are inexperienced and often just plain stupid. They HAVE to be given their crap from corporate with the support vehicles.

Publicity and maintained public image are expensive and calculated. The overnight sensations are crafted. Maybe many are seeded, but the ones that catch hold are given more funding until they have an audience and a polity.

Could be true. Anything is possible now.

She was trying to cue the soap opera lines. The wary prey saw an excuse for the exits.

Never cue the soap opera lines before their time.
zzyzzx says

https://youtube.com/shorts/BggRsNqEn2A?si=js2QKMuXaapJAU6K

Booger says

I can't tell if she's serious or parodizing.

MolotovCocktail says

Booger says

I can't tell if she's serious or parodizing.

Oh, she's serious - look at the 2 inch long fake nails. She's a spigger, rolled with the Tyrones, got 3 kids by probably by three baby daddies.

stereotomy says

Oh, she's serious - look at the 2 inch long fake nails.

Part of the act. She seems to be parodying by painting herself in the worst way yet having outrageous expectations. Not even the oft stated "$100k income" but raised to $130k.

Most girls expect you to pay for all the dates. They expect you to give them gifts, preferably expensive ones, like a new iPhone.
In essence, most women want to be treated like children in a relationship, cared for and pampered, and if something goes wrong, it's obviously your fault.
We have the concept of a “real man” and the phrase “a man should,” which girls always use if you don't do what she wants you to do. But in reality, it boils down to you giving her as much money as she wants, not interfering with her living the way she wants, and then she'll allow you to have sex with her.

I refer back to an older guy who perfected the bait. He had enough money and used the dating services. He said he ALWAYS paid, whether the woman was old or young, and told me there was never any suggestion of the females picking up any kind of check EVER.

It was not cheap, but he would get laid but then squeeze played. I suppose the question is after the money spent on the fishing expeditions, was it cheaper or more expensive than standard prostitutes without the relationship pretense?

There are the men who become 'companions' for wealthy women (have one a few doors down in Tri Valley) but I could never imagine doing such a thing, even though I had a few rich girls who wanted me and whose daddies would have paid the way. Parents always really liked me for some reason, although girls never thought I gave them enough of the soap opera line treatments.

I was condemned by temperament to be poor or get stuff on my own. I just always thought I would rather be poor than carry a rich woman's luggage.

Booger says

it boils down to you giving her as much money as she wants, not interfering with her living the way she wants, and then she'll allow you to have sex with her.

This was not a thing back before the pill and feminism, except for prostitutes.

Patrick says

Booger says

it boils down to you giving her as much money as she wants, not interfering with her living the way she wants, and then she'll allow you to have sex with her.

This was not a thing back before the pill and feminism, except for prostitutes.

Seems almost everything is corrupted now. I keep being told things will correct. Sure, sure it will. If so, it’ll be a looooong time imo.

Booger says

But in reality, it boils down to you giving her as much money as she wants, not interfering with her living the way she wants, and then she'll allow you to have sex with her.

??? Woman will have sex if they are attracted to you. Some will even cook you a dinner first.

HeadSet says

Booger says

But in reality, it boils down to you giving her as much money as she wants, not interfering with her living the way she wants, and then she'll allow you to have sex with her.

??? Woman will have sex if they are attracted to you. Some will even cook you a dinner first.

Maybe GenX and before, since then no. There is a resurging trend of trad wives in gen alpha but TBD. There is currently a total lack of hot women since feminism and woke culture destroyed them. Takes a while to replenish. In the meantime the few decent looking womyn will milk you dry, financially, cooking skillz? Get outta here

Most nuevo-Tradwives are just burntout partyhoes, sadly.

Single Moms and/or approaching 30 and "reform" themselves, or rather their appearance.

DemoralizerOfPanicans says

Most nuevo-Tradwives are just burntout partyhoes, sadly.

Single Moms and/or approaching 30 and "reform" themselves, or rather their appearance.

Yeah they have to be younger when making that decision. I'm hoping the lack of affordable alcohol and trend of not drinking (as long as you don't replace it with weed) among gen alpha/z will actually bring forth some real trade wives, or at least as good as they get. The boys would appreciate it and I could stop sounding off on marriage, really want to promote it.

mell says

Yeah they have to be younger when making that decision. I'm hoping the lack of affordable alcohol and trend of not drinking (as long as you don't replace it with weed) among gen alpha/z will actually bring forth some real trade wives, or at least as good as they get. The boys would appreciate it and I could stop sounding off on marriage, really want to promote it.

I hope so. BUT, like the tattoo thing, the not drinking is seemingly a guy thing. Women are actually increasing their drinking, men are way down!

I came across the data a year or so ago, I'm sure it's on here but Rollo was talking about it.

https://youtube.com/shorts/MxX1LEY2AYQ?si=FP9429AOkJExygeU

Booger says

https://youtube.com/shorts/MxX1LEY2AYQ?si=FP9429AOkJExygeU

Nice fable. No woman who was doing a "practice husband" would have signed a pre-nup. Even so, a judge will throw out any provision that overclassifies his salary as separate property or a clause that denies alimony if it leaves the wife destitute.

HeadSet says

Booger says

https://youtube.com/shorts/MxX1LEY2AYQ?si=FP9429AOkJExygeU

Nice fable. No woman who was doing a "practice husband" would have signed a pre-nup. Even so, a judge will throw out any provision that overclassifies his salary as separate property or a clause that denies alimony if it leaves the wife destitute.

If there are no kids the prenup could hold although this may well be made up

HeadSet says

Booger says

https://youtube.com/shorts/MxX1LEY2AYQ?si=FP9429AOkJExygeU

Nice fable. No woman who was doing a "practice husband" would have signed a pre-nup. Even so, a judge will throw out any provision that overclassifies his salary as separate property or a clause that denies alimony if it leaves the wife destitute.

Replace salary with trust fund. Now what?

HeadSet says

Nice fable. No woman who was doing a "practice husband" would have signed a pre-nup. Even so, a judge will throw out any provision that overclassifies his salary as separate property or a clause that denies alimony if it leaves the wife destitute.

There are a ton of these made up stories in the tube with AI voice narration. Sometimes the title doesn't even match the story when you watch it. Mostly the same shit with slight variation. One the guy puts superglue in his cheating wife's lube. In another it's vibrant green dye.

Great stories though. I guy can dream the feminized family courts aren't all stacked up against us.

https://youtube.com/shorts/8h4Lmn0jNyk?si=XlZHxGjnn8irJldv

Booger says

https://youtube.com/shorts/8h4Lmn0jNyk?si=XlZHxGjnn8irJldv

Women were the beginning of all sin. Never forget that.

I saw a guy asking girls in Tokyo what was more important to them in a man; 1. fidelity 2. having money.

Can you guess which they chose? It was his having money.

And there you have it; sometimes I feel sorry for guys who think their charm will get them pussy; it will work randomly but not consistently.

Some guys don't like the uncertainty of the hunting game and get married.

My mother said something which surprised me because she was never rude nor impolite: "Why buy the cow when you've got the milk for free?"

She wasn't exactly accurate because that milk isn't ever really free after your thirties.