patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,362,598 comments by 15,735 users - Booger, floki online now
Sex with at least 21 women lowers risk of prostate cancer, academics find
2014 Oct 28, 3:43am 12,336 views 46 comments
by zzyzzx follow (9)
Comments 1 - 40 of 46 Next » Last » Search these comments
Strategist
2014 Oct 28, 4:07am
Sex with at least 21 women lowers risk of prostate cancer, academics find
You just made Rin's day.
Ceffer
2014 Oct 28, 4:08am
Another research positive strike for Rin's Montreal hoes.
Boink On!
Montreal should have a "Boink for Health" day with a hooker parade.
Strategist
2014 Oct 28, 4:09am
Another research positive strike for Rin's Montreal hoes.
Boink On!
Montreal should have a "Boink for Health" day with a hooker parade.
Isn't the Mardi Gras something like that?
Rin
2014 Oct 28, 4:12am
Sex with at least 21 women lowers risk of prostate cancer, academics find
You just made Rin's day.
This one calls for a celebration!!!
Rock & Roll ...
Am I the only who questions how body knows the difference between a different vagina, the same married vagina, and a palm(assuming the masturbator moderately exercises)?
Ceffer
2014 Oct 28, 4:21am
Prostates must suffer cancer inducing frustration without feedback from an actual vagina. They must also be able to count.
zzyzzx
2014 Oct 28, 4:26am
Am I the only who questions how body knows the difference between a different vagina, the same married vagina, and a palm(assuming the masturbator moderately exercises)?
I'm guessing it's because an article titled Sex with at least 21 different palms lowers risk of prostate cancer won't get as much attention.
Rin
2014 Oct 28, 4:26am
Am I the only who questions how body knows the difference between a vagina and a palm(assuming the masturbator moderately exercises)?
According to RealDoll owners, the full silicone doll's interior silicone cavities, are made of softer material than the outside. Using an electric blanket for a few hours, the doll is completely warm. Thus, the human body is completely fooled into believing that it's experiencing the real thing, and thus, along with the tighter fit, it's a lot greater stimulation than an ordinary hand job. Of course the mind isn't fooled but who cares.
zzyzzx
2014 Oct 28, 4:28am
Using an electric blanket for a few hours, the doll is completely warm.
You mean they don't have a built in heater?
Ceffer
2014 Oct 28, 4:30am
RealDolls need to hire women to milk their vaginas for real, boinking pussy juices to imbed in their dolls.
That way, the RealDolls will enjoy prostate health parity, an infallible marketing ploy.
You can imbed the same doll with dozens of different pussy juice samples.
That, and reminding you to take out the garbage, will enhance the authenticity.
Rin
2014 Oct 28, 4:52am
You can imbed the same doll with dozens of different pussy juice samples.
I believe squalene, usually found in shark liver oil, is common in vaginal fluids.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squalene
According to the article, it also can be found from plant sources (primarily vegetable oils) as well as amaranth seed, rice bran, wheat germ, and olives. Thus, it might be as simple as creating a carousel of squalene sources and randomizing the automated lubrication system.
Then, the body will be continually fooled into believing it's boinking something new.
That, and reminding you to take out the garbage, will enhance the authenticity.
That would immediately get me to stop boinking.
Ceffer
2014 Oct 28, 4:54am
I believe squalene, usually found in shark liver oil, is common in vaginal fluids.
EEwww! Sounds like fucking a squid. On second thought.......
As far as taking out the garbage, you could always just tell the RealDoll to take a flying fuck at herself, since you have already had her and flung her off.
Rin
2014 Oct 28, 5:04am
I believe squalene, usually found in shark liver oil, is common in vaginal fluids.
EEwww! Sounds like fucking a squid. On second thought.......
As far as taking out the garbage, you could always just tell the RealDoll to take a flying fuck at herself, since you have already had her and flung her off.
We'll use code names for Shark, Wheat Germ, Safflower, Olive, Rice Bran, etc, so the vials will read Shauna, Wendy, Sally, Olivia, Rita, etc.
Dan8267
2014 Oct 28, 6:31am
Men who had slept with more than 20 women lowered their risk of developing cancer by almost one third, and were 19 per cent less likely to develop the most aggressive form.
In contrast, men who slept with 20 men doubled their risk of developing prostate cancer compared with men who have never had sex with another man.
Yet another bullshit article that assumes correlation means causality.
Sleeping with more than 20 women protects men against prostate cancer, a study has suggested.
WRONG. The study does not suggest this.
Could it be that gay men are simply more likely to develop prostrate cancer and that gay men are also more likely to sleep with other men than heterosexual men are? Studies have shown causality between testosterone levels in the womb and homosexual behavior in men. Could that possibly be the reason why gay men are also more likely to develop prostrate cancer?
The stupidity and low quality of the press never ceases to amaze me.
If you want to know if having sex with men causes prostrate cancer, find 100 heterosexual guys and have them fuck 20 other guys and see how many develop prostrate cancer. If it's statistically significantly more than a control group then your study would suggest gay man sex causes cancer.
Similarly, to test the hypothesis that pussy prevents or cures prostrate cancer, do the reverse. I'm skeptical that pussy will prevent prostrate cancer, but I'll sign up for the test group for the sake of science.
Dan8267
2014 Oct 28, 6:32am
Sex with at least 21 women lowers risk of prostate cancer
In related news, Obamacare now covers strip clubs.
Ceffer
2014 Oct 28, 6:38am
A proper study should include three control groups. 100 men slathered only with pussy juices from at least 20 different vaginas, 100 men slathered only with anal juices of at least 20 homosexual men, and a control group of 100 men who masturbate but have no sex per se and remain unslathered, and finally a group of 100 men who have sex of no kind whatsoever, but are allowed impure thoughts.
Isn't science great? Which group would you sign up for?
Rin
2014 Oct 28, 6:55am
Sex with at least 21 women lowers risk of prostate cancer
In related news, Obamacare now covers strip clubs.
NO WAY! I can't afford to pay emergency room fees for a private dance.
Rin
2014 Oct 28, 8:22am
being propositioned by a virgin half my age
Can you verify her age from an actual passport, since many driver's licenses are easier to fake?
In other words, don't be David Duchovny's character in 'Californication'.
Thanks for the reminder. Yes, I will verify her age (just over 20); she is a registered student at an elite college (not Freshmen either), so I'm pretty sure she is over 18.
Rin
2014 Oct 28, 9:00am
Thanks for the reminder. Yes, I will verify her age (just over 20); she is a registered student at an elite college (not Freshmen either), so I'm pretty sure she is over 18
Hold it! I'd never heard of a female, who's a virgin, by the age of 20 in America. That's almost a Bigfoot sighting, unless she looks like Bigfoot herself :-) and then it makes sense.
Are you certain that she's not a 17 year old, playing a 20-something?
When I was in college, almost every female friend/acquaintance had lost her virginity between ages 15 and 19. There were two virgins, one was a religious nut, so it kinda figured with the whole "purity" before marriage ideal, and the other, the GoodYear blimp, who thought that some muscle bound idiot (who was also a financier and/or a lawyer), was going to pick her up. Yes, she was delusional and had constant fantasies about Brad Pitt throwing pick up lines at her.
Trust me, when I'm up in MTL, and an esc*rt shows up, who clearly makes me doubt that she's "24", I ask for an ID, and if she hesitates, I send her back. For the most part, however, the Canadian Mounties do a good job of busting agencies who don't do the age verification of their contractors. It's generally not a problem.
Peter P
2014 Oct 28, 9:09am
As I have said many times before, virgins are as overrated as new cars.
She is cute and has a hot body. From a conservative family and somewhat book-wormish, but very well read. She has experience with girls.
Perhaps I'm giving her too much benefit of doubt for believing her virginity with men without provence (she does not claim to be a technical virgin, due to prior experimentation with girls with toys). In any case, I was not looking for a virgin; it just sprang on me.
Rin
2014 Oct 28, 9:15am
(she does not claim to be a technical virgin, due to prior experimentation with girls with toys). In any case, I was not looking for a virgin; it just sprang on me.
Ok, that clears it up. She's into that whole bi-curious thing, which is now rampant at many Seven Sister and like colleges in the northeast. That's fine, because a lot of gals in those situations fear 'man as a predator' and probably feel better, being done by a woman with a strap-on dildo.
Yeah, what a waste. I was tempted to joke about being the worst kind of virgin: not technical virgin but no experience, but thought better of it than potentially offending her (although I think she would have appreciated the humor; she is that cool!). Personally, I do not care about female virginity one way or another. Just curious about woman's perspective for first time with men, and men's experience with women who are completely new to men.
Peter P
2014 Oct 28, 9:22am
RE: technical virgin
???
Does it depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is?
LOL. Technicality refers to the existence/preservation of a small piece of flesh; has been the case for thousands of years.
Strategist
2014 Oct 28, 9:41am
A proper study should include three control groups. 100 men slathered only with pussy juices from at least 20 different vaginas, 100 men slathered only with anal juices of at least 20 homosexual men, and a control group of 100 men who masturbate but have no sex per se and remain unslathered, and finally a group of 100 men who have sex of no kind whatsoever, but are allowed impure thoughts.
Isn't science great? Which group would you sign up for?
I don't want to get "slathered" That's like watching a baseball game from outside the stadium. I want to go INSIDE, and jump around.
By the way, first group please. Thanks.
Strategist
2014 Oct 28, 9:46am
LOL. Technicality refers to the existence/preservation of a small piece of flesh; has been the case for thousands of years.
Some Middle Eastern women like to patch it up again before they marry.
prodigy
2014 Oct 28, 1:09pm
thanks for the lead...i just put down 5 g's for this one.
For those who don't know what a RealDoll is, here's a pictorial ...
NDrLoR
2014 Oct 28, 2:08pm
Sleeping with more than 20 women protects men against prostate cance
But probably replaces it with a chance at urethral cancer through exposure to HPV.
Vicente
2014 Oct 28, 3:38pm
I've seen this thing referenced every where today.
IMO the 20 thing just means they are unusually ACTIVE. And not just the splooging I mean they are up and at-em Macking on anything in a skirt. I had an older college buddy like that, like a fucking Energizer Bunny. If I was heading to bed after a date, he was finishing one and dialing up the second one. A second round of dancing sure! He's still like that and he's over 50 now.
Rin
2014 Oct 29, 8:25am
I'm beginning to think that PatNet is for porn.
It's been therapy for me.
I'm seldom able to talk about this stuff with regular ppl. Many ppl are judgmental, conforming, and expect one to believe in dating, love, romance, etc.
Rin
2014 Oct 29, 8:37am
I'm seldom able to talk about this stuff with regular ppl. Many ppl are judgmental,
Well it's a good thing you won't find those judgmental types of people at Patnet!
Here's we get both. In society, ppl put on acts, when faced with the fact that perhaps they're dating or married to the wrong person. Or that 'happily ever after' is mostly a myth but won't talk it, for fear of being outed or judged.
Sleeping with more than 20 women protects men against prostate cancer, a study has suggested.
Is that at the same time?
Comments 1 - 40 of 46 Next » Last » Search these comments
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/11192385/Sex-with-21-women-lowers-risk-of-prostate-cancer-academics-find.html
Sleeping with more than 20 women protects men against prostate cancer, a study has suggested.
Men who had slept with more than 20 women lowered their risk of developing cancer by almost one third, and were 19 per cent less likely to develop the most aggressive form.
In contrast, men who slept with 20 men doubled their risk of developing prostate cancer compared with men who have never had sex with another man.
Researchers at the University of Montreal believe that intercourse protects men, and men who are more promiscuous have more sex than those in monogamous relationships.
However, for homosexual men the benefit is lost because of the increased risk of picking up a sexually transmitted disease, and the damage to their bodies from intercourse. However gay men with just one partner are at no greater risk.
"It is possible that having many female sexual partners results in a higher frequency of ejaculations, whose protective effect against prostate cancer has been previously observed in cohort studies," said lead researcher Dr Marie-Elise Parent.
But when asked whether public health authorities should recommend men to sleep with many women in their lives Dr Parent added: "We're not there yet."
The study looked at more than 3,200 men over a four year period between 2005 and 2009.
Overall, men with prostate cancer were twice as likely to have a relative with cancer. However, the researchers were surprised to find that the number of sexual partners also affected the development of their cancer.
Men who said they had never had sexual intercourse were almost twice as likely to be diagnosed with prostate cancer as those who said they had.
When a man has slept with more than 20 women during his lifetime there was a 28 per cent reduction in the risk of having prostate cancer, and a 19 per cent reduction for aggressive types of cancer.
On the other hand, those who have slept with more than 20 men are twice as likely to be diagnosed with prostate cancer of all types compared to those who have never slept with a man.
And their risk of having a less aggressive prostate cancer increases by 500 per cent compared to those who have had only one male partner.
Dr Parent said that she could only formulate "highly speculative" hypotheses to explain the association.
"It could come from greater exposure to STIs, or it could be that anal intercourse produces physical trauma to the prostate," she said.
Previous studies have found that sexual intercourse may have a protective effect against prostate cancer because it reduces the concentration of carcinogenic crystal-like substances in the fluid of the prostate.
The study, published in the Journal Cancer Epidemiology is the first to find a link between the number of sexual partners and the risk of developing cancer.
"We were fortunate to have participants from Montreal who were comfortable talking about their sexuality, no matter what sexual experiences they have had, and this openness would probably not have been the same 20 or 30 years ago," said lead researcher Dr Marie-Elise Parent.
"Indeed, thanks to them, we now know that the number and type of partners must be taken into account to better understand the causes of prostate cancer."